Friday 12 April 2019

Julian Assange's arrest an 'unprecedented' threat to press freedom, advocates warn


In  dramatic scenes Australian Wikileaks founder, whistleblower and international journalist Julian Assange  was arrested on Thursday  morning at the Ecuadorian embassy after the Lenin Moreno administration removed his political asylum. Previously Assange had diplomatic asylum and had lived at the embassy since 2012, eventually gaining Ecuadorian citizenship after efforts by Sweden to have him extradited on allegations of sexual assault. Assange has vigorously denied the charges, insisting they were part of a plot by political enemies to silence him. We should however be  forever mindful though of those who have sought some form of justice, when they feel they have been wronged despite the fame or infamy of those that they happen to accuse.
 Assange originally.sought refuge in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London fearing not extradition to Sweden but to the US over his role as founder and public face of Wikileaks. Rafael Correa, Ecuador’s former president, has since called Moreno a “traitor”:
 In the video, Julian Assange can be heard screaming, “The UK must resist this attempt by the Trump administration” as he was hauled into the van.


Shortly after, the U.S. government confirmed that Assange has been charged with computer hacking crimes for trying to illegally access "secret" materials on a U.S. government computer. The charge is officially listed as "conspiracy to commit computer intrusion."
The indictment accuses Assange of trying to access the secret material "with reason to believe that such information so obtained could be used to the injury of the United States and the advantage of any foreign nation."
The charges are aimed at the theft of information rather than the publication of material.
Those materials included thousands of US military and diplomatic files exposing controversial US military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.Those actions included evidence of torture, a video of a US Army helicopter attack that killed two journalists in Baghdad in 2007, and the large numbers of civilian deaths that resulted from US combat action.
They also  relate to materials released by former Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, now known as Chelsea Manning, who was convicted in 2013 of leaking classified government and military documents to WikiLeaks. She had worked as an intelligence analyst in Iraq and was arrested in 2010.The US government alleges that Assange tried to provide direct assistance to Manning in her efforts to access some of documents by cracking an encrypted password. Manning had part of the password, but needed help unlocking the rest of it. The charges say she provided copies of the Linux system to Assange, though in the documents made public so far, it does not appear he was successful in decrypting the rest.Manning was jailed again last month for refusing to testify to a grand jury investigating WikiLeaks. U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton ordered Manning to jail for contempt of court in March after a brief hearing in which Manning confirmed she had no intention of testifying. All the while, Assange was secluded in the Ecuador embassy.
Assange is currently being held at London police station where he will await an appearance at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court, on May 2 t prison video link , in relation to the extradition WikiLeaks has consistently highlighted that its founder and former editor Julian Assange has been arbitrarily detained 8+ years without charge by the UK Govt (6+ years within the Ecuador Embassy in London)  and 2 years house arrest.
Members of the legal team for Julian Assange have described the US charges against him as an "unprecedented" threat to press freedom. His lawyer Jennifer Robinson said all journalists and media organisations are put at risk by the development.Another member of Assange's legal team, Barry Pollack, said he believes the US charges could chill press freedom because of the criminalisation of interactions between journalists and whistleblowers. ,
Academics and campaigners  have condemned large chunks of the indictment that they said went head-to-head with basic activities of journalism protected by the first amendment of the US constitution. They said these sections of the charges rang alarm bells that should reverberate around the world.
Yochai Benkler, a Harvard law professor who wrote the first major legal study of the legal implications of prosecuting WikiLeaks, said the charge sheet contained some “very dangerous elements that pose significant risk to national security reporting. Sections of the indictment are vastly overbroad and could have a significant chilling effect – they ought to be rejected.”
Carrie Decell, staff attorney with the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said the charges “risk having a chill on journalism”. She added that the tone of the indictment and the public release from the Department of Justice that went with it suggested that the US government desired precisely that effect.
“Many of the allegations fall absolutely within the first amendment’s protections of journalistic activity. That’s very troubling to us.”
The arrest marks a dramatic twist in the trajectory of Assange’s career, an arc that has seen him hailed at times as a heroic free speech advocate, a villain to others, who when he decided to uncover the mass secrets of global war crimes, espionage and dirty corporate deals, had to fight his own instinct to keep these secrets unexposed so as to protect himself. He knew that he could spend his entire life in prison, and ironically a  few weeks ago through a leak  people were alerted that the US was gearing up to give Julian  the final blow. A secret plan was hatched  to have Julian extradited - and his struggle terminated.
Now a European country, the United Kingdom, has given in to pressure from Donald Trump, and has handed Julian over. This amounts to nothing less than a coordinated crackdown on a journalist and activist: and this is part of the authoritarian shift that is taking place world-wide – from the US to Turkey, from Hungary to Brazil, and now from Ecuador to the UK.
The brave actions of whistleblowers strengthen transparency and democracy but Julian is now in custody for breaching bail conditions imposed over a warrant that was rescinded. Anyone else would be fined and released. Except that Julian Assange’s persecution is all about challenging our right to know about the crimes governments commit in our name.
Assange has long said Wikileaks is a journalistic endeavor protected  by freedom of the press laws. In 2017, a UK, tribunal recognised Wikileaks as a "media organisation." Wikileaks under his stewardship has become a thorn in the side for governments, particularly Western governments, revealing the ugly truth of crimes committed by US forces in Iraq, the West’s role in the destabilization of Ukraine in 2014, the destruction of Libya  etc.
If Assange is convicted  or extradicted  we will inch slowly away from being an open society, and the only people who will benefit are the ones who really have something to hide, and they are the ones we should be worrying about the most. Numerous people and organisations have since reacted with alarm on news of Assange's arrest.Here are a selection.

NUJ reaction: Julian Assange arrest

Following UK police forcibly removing the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, from the Ecuadorian embassy in London and arresting him, Seamus Dooley, NUJ assistant general secretary, said:
“The NUJ is shocked and concerned by the actions of the authorities today in relation to Julian Assange. His lawyer has confirmed he has been arrested not just for breach of bail conditions but also in relation to a US extradition request. The UK should not be acting on behalf of the Trump administration in this case. The NUJ recognises the inherent link between and importance of leaked confidential documents and journalism reporting in the public interest. It should be remembered that in April 2010 WikiLeaks released Collateral Murder, a video showing a 2007 US Apache helicopter attack upon individuals in Baghdad, more than 23 people were killed including two Reuters journalists. The manner in which Assange is treated will be of great significance to the practice of journalism.”
 
Freedom of the Press Foundation

said: “Whether or not you like Assange, the charge against him is a serious press freedom threat and should be vigorously protested by all those who care about the first amendment.”

And at Parliament Diane Abbott, Shadow Home Secretary spoke eloquently about the importance of whistleblowers, the contributions of WikiLeaks in revealing war crimes and that her side of the House would be very concerned about a US extradition for Julian Assange. Ms Abbott heaped praise on the activist for exposing activities relating to “illegal war, mass murder murder of civilians and corruption on a grand scale”.


And Leader of the Labour Party Jeremy Corbyn backed her words in Parliament with an unequivocal statement of support  calling on the government to oppose the extradition of Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange to the US.
The Labour leader suggested that Assange – who faces charges of conspiring to break into a classified government computer – could be sent to the US for “exposing evidence of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan”.



The extradition of Julian Assange to the US for exposing evidence of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan should be opposed by the British government.

Whistleblower Edward Snowden also called it “a dark moment for press freedom”.

We should not forget Assange for what WikiLeaks has exposed, and we must oppose the attempts to gag him. In the aftermath of his  arrest,  what happens next could pose a serious threat on journalism and the  future of free speech in general.
Julian Assange, as was Chelsea Manning, as will be Edward Snowden if he dares set foot outside Russia, is being punished for exposing  the thin veil of freedom, human rights  and civil liberties.They lied about Iraq, they lied about Libya, they lied about Syria, and they lie every day about the murky relationships between governments and corporations.

Here is a link to a RT article We are all Julian Assange

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/456239-assange-arrest-police-extradition/

and this from John Pilger The Assange Arrest is a Warning from History

https://defend.wikileaks.org/2019/04/13/the-assange-arrest-is-a-warning-from-history/

and here is Jonathan Cook's take on events

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2019-04-11/julian-assange-lies-arrest/

    Please also consider signing the following petitions,

https://i.diem25.org/petitions/1?show=form

https://www.change.org/p/don-t-hand-assange-over-to-the-u-s

https://www.change.org/p/free-julian-assange-before-it-s-too-late-stop-the-extradition

https://www.codepink.org/assange?utm_campaign=assange&utm_medium=email&utm_source=codepink

No comments:

Post a Comment