Monday, 15 June 2026

Palestine Action ban is lawful, Court of Appeal rules


Disgraceful, read  and  weep. The decision to ban Palestine Action as a terror group was lawful, the Court of Appeal has ruled. The court of appeal today overturned the high court’s February decision that found the ban to be unlawful on the grounds that it disproportionately interfered with free speech and assembly, and that former home secretary Yvette Cooper had breached her own process during proscription. 
The court of appeal’s decision means supporting the direct action group – which targets businesses complicit in Israel’s genocide in Gaza – will remain a crimnal offence for members of the group or people who support them   and  now  face up to 14 years in prison – even for holding up a sign.  
Palestine Action was proscribed under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 in July 2025, making it the first direct action group to be banned under UK terror legislation and categorised with the likes of Isis and Al Qaeda. 
The ruling follows a massive wave of state repression, during which British police have arrested more than 3,000 citizens more than during the entire ‘war on terror’ for defying the ban since it came into force –and protesting the criminalization of dissent. 
Last week,the state’s campaign to shield the arms trade went a step further on Friday, when a London court ruled that four Palestine Action  activists Lottie Head, 29, Samuel Corner, 23, Ellie Kamio, 30, and Fatema Rajwani, 21 who  were convicted of property damage a a facility  owned by Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest weapons manufacturer, were sentenced as terrorists despite not being found guilty of a terrorism offence. 
This move was kept secret from the jury until after they delivered their verdict, and is the first time direct actionists have been sentenced as terrorists for non-violent criminal offences. an Israeli-owned military facility would be sentenced on the basis of having a "terrorist connection."  
A statement from The Filton 25 Defence Committee said: “The four protesters sentenced today destroyed over 40 Israeli weapons, including killer drones, which are used in almost every massacre of Palestinians in Gaza. By taking direct action, they saved lives. That is not terrorism, it is a duty. Today’s ruling will be appealed to correct this serious miscarriage of justice.” 
I think  it is shameful  that a UK court found there was a "terrorist connection" in imposing disproportionate sentences on members of Palestine Action  that explicitly targets British factories manufacturing weapons for Israel's genocide in Gaza. which is not consistent with international human rights law .
The judges allowed policy reasons to override strictly legal arguments, and they showed deference to ‘national security’ questions. They also said that proscription is a ‘proportionate’ interference with free speech rights. In other words, they allowed the government to ride roughshod over the law.
Another shameful stitch-up by the British state, done at the behest of the Zionists.An  utter  fucking travesty, the U.K.  gas  become  a satellite state of Israel.It  is outrageous that the British gov has  banned  non violent direct action group Palestine Action whilst it still sells weapons to the state that is carrying out a genocide.  
Palestine Action represent every individual who opposes the Israeli war machine. They represent every person that believes Palestinians are worth more  than the tools used to kill them. They represent every person who stands for Palestinian liberation. 
It's absurd to brand them a "terrorist" group for daring to spray paint on an aircraft that is helping the terrorist entity known as Israel to kill women and children. Palestine Action hasn’t murdered any people queuing for food aid, hasn’t bombed any hospitals or incinerated patients in tents, hasn’t stolen land or fired at a desperately frightened 6 year-old with a tank.  
Palestine Action are doing what the UK government have failed to do under domestic and IHL, and this is to stop arming, aiding and abetting a holocaust! 
The suffragettes movement, particularly the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU), would be considered a "terrorist organisation" By UK law today. Taking action against companies complicit in genocide is not terrorism. The point is to make fewer people die. It's the opposite of terrorism. and supporting the liberation for Palestinian people is not terrorism. 
Drone-striking refugees in tents is terrorism. Bombing displaced people in a designated “safe zone” is terrorism. Sniping children is terrorism. Shooting starving people as they queue for food is terrorism. And by criminalising Palestine Action our government is complicit in this , the very reason ordinary citizens are forced to take direct action to protest to stop them.. 
Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori reacted to the court ruling, saying: "We will fight this all the way. We will seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court". She called the terrorism ban on the group one of the "most extreme attacks on free speech"
Today's decision is part of a broader assault on our right to protest in an attempt to silence all those standing in solidarity with the Palestinian people and opposing Israel's genocide. We know that the real terrorists and criminals are those who facilitate Israel’s atrocities against the Palestinian people, and we  must  not be silenced as we continue to oppose British complicity in these crimes. The proscription of Palestine Action is a ferocious attack on our freedom of expression.
Palestine Action was so effective in disrupting the Israeli weapons industry, that the state threw all its might against  them . By doing so, they've exposed how they prioritise the Zionist regime over its own citizens.
With this judicial reversal, the UK state has solidified its legal assault on the Palestine solidarity movement.The aggressive legal manouver, which elevates non-violent direct action to the level of armed militancy, effectively lumps peaceful anti-war activists into the same legal category as global terror syndicates.
This decision must be strongly condemned by all those who believe in protecting our civil liberties ns  in the strongest possible terms. 
Classifying protest through direct action as terrorism brings Parliament and our judicial system into disrepute. The government must stop its crackdown on protest and defend our right to speak up. We must not stop speaking out against genocide. We must not stop fighting for the ban to be lifted, the end of the use of terror legislation against us, and crucially, for a free Palestine.
No matter what this judge said, history will look back on Palestine Action and those who’ve protested against the ban as the suffragettes of our age.

Sunday, 14 June 2026

Remembering the life of Revolutionary Socialist Ernesto "Che" Guevara (June 14, 1928 – October 9, 1967)



 Portrait of Che Guevara - "Guerrillero Heroico" - Alberto Korda (1960) 

Today I remember the birth of Argentine revolutionary socialist,Ernesto Rafael Guevara de la Serna, 
familiarly known by the Argentinian slang word “Che, who  was born  in Rosario República Argentina on 14th June 1928 to politically aware upper-middle-class parents. Although some sources suggest he was actually born on May 14, 1928. 
Guevara's father, Ernesto Guevara Lynch, came from a family that had been in Argentina for 12 generations and was a prestigious one. His ancestor, Patrick Lynch, was born in Ireland in 1715, later traveled to Argentina via Spain, and by the end of the 18th century, he had become the viceroy of the La Plata-Parana River region.
His mother, Celia de la Serna y Llosa, also came from a family that had been in Argentina for 7 generations, likewise an aristocratic family; her ancestor, José de la Serna, was the last Spanish viceroy of Peru. Guevara's parents married in 1927. 
His father said “in my son’s veins flowed the blood of the Irish rebels”. Ernesto was diagnosed asthmatic at the age of two. Whereas his condition was chronic in Buenos Aires, when they moved to Alta Gracia, a dry highland province, it stabilised. His parents monitored his health, the humidity, his clothing and diet in an attempt to reduce the severity of the symptoms. Even as a child, it is said that he “showed an unusually strong self discipline by adhering to his asthma diets”.  
Often his parents made him stay at home, for fear of an attack. He became a precocious reader, as this was one of the only things he could do when asthma struck. The family home contained more than 3,000 books and Guevara read very widely in world literature, politics and poetry. He would make handwritten notebooks of notes and quotations from his favourite authors. Later, he was a prolific writer and diarist  himself.
An intellectual and an idealist, able to speak coherently about Aristotle, Kant, Marx, Gide or Faulkner, he also loved poetry, and was equally at home with Keats as with Sara De Ibáñez, his favorite writer. It is said that he knew Kipling's "If" by heart.  
At school, he displayed a fiercely competitive personality, perhaps as compensation for his sickliness. Despite his illness, Guevara was an excellent sportsman – rugby, athletics, cycling, shooting were all activities into which he poured all of his energies.  
Guevara acquired his famous nickname "Che." as  "Che" is a Spanish interjection widely used in Argentina and some regions of South America, commonly employed to greet people or express surprise, similar to expressions like "hey" or "wow" in Chinese.
In 1948, he began to study medicine at Buenos Aires University. In his vacations, he made his famous trips by motorcycle through Argentina, Chile and Peru(as portrayed in his journals and dramatized in the 2004 film The Motorcycle Diaries). On these journeys, he encountered the poor and dispossessed – lepers, workers, peasants – with whom he identified and whose cause he subsequently passionately espoused. 
Graduating from medical school in 1953, he journeyed through Bolivia and Peru to Guatemala, where he witnessed the social revolution under President Jacobo Arbenz. After Arbenz’s overthrow in a U.S.-orchestrated coup in 1954, which steeled Guevara’s anti-imperialism. His work as a doctor further exposed him to the poor, whose sufferings Guevara attributed to oppressive South American governments backed by US capitalist interests.
Guevara journeyed to Mexico and established contact with  two brothers who shared his ideas; Fidel and Raul Castro. alongside other Cuban exiles.. Convinced that Castro was the visionary revolutionary he had long sought, he joined Castro’s 26 July Movement and soon became one of its leaders.  
The group embarked for Cuba in December 1956,  aboard a badly overloaded yacht called "Granma".Only 12, including Fidel his brother and Guevara, escaped a government ambush when they landed in eastern Cuba.
Taking refuge in the rugged Sierra Maestra mountains, they built a guerrilla force of several thousand fighters who, along with urban rebel groups, defeated Cuban dictator Fulgencio Batista,in just over two years.
Commandante Guevara was second only to Castro in the revolutionary movement, and played a major role in the Cuban revolution earning a reputation as a skilled and sometimes ruthless commander. In the guerilla campaign in the mountains, the two contradictory sides of Guevara’s personality were demonstrated: his love and care for his fighters, whom he helped to educate and entertain, but also his ruthlessness, for example in shooting informers, deserters and spies. 
As a military leader, he was intelligent and brave, with a tendency towards foolhardiness, according to his leader Castro. It is said that Guevara played an important role in converting Castro to communism, often quoting Marx, Engels, Mao Tse-tung and others. 
By 1959, the dictator Batista had fled and the Castro regime took over. In the following months, Guevara commanded the La Cabana prison, and was responsible for exacting revolutionary justice against the war criminals and others from the old regime. 
Commandate Guevara told the tribunals  “Don’t drag out the process. This is a revolution. Don’t use bourgeois legal methods, the proof is secondary. We must act through conviction. We’re dealing with a bunch of criminals and assassins.”  
Several hundred prisoners were shot as Guevara watched from on top of a wall, lying on his back, cigar in mouth, to encourage the firing squads. 
 Che Guevara proved to be less effective as an economic leader than a military one. He became president of the Cuban national bank, with his signature “Che” on the bank notes signalling his distaste for money. However, he had more success with the Cuban Literacy Campaign, which taught more than 700,000 people to read and write. In Cuba’s government, he also enacted land reform to distribute land from bourgeois land owners to Cuban peasants. 
At the heart of Cuban Internationalism, Guevara intertwined revolution and medicine, based on his ideas of racial equality. In his 1960 speech to health workers and medical students, Guevara asserts the need for a mobilization of doctors as part of the fight against capitalism. Based on his speech, his travels demonstrated his understanding of the consequences that colonization has had on Black and indigenous people in the Global South. 
Guevara and the Cuban government also took great lengths to push for medical missions in Africa. This stemmed from both the African diaspora in Cuba and shortcomings in revolutionizing Latin America. Although not in Sub-Saharan Africa, in Algeria Guevara assisted in providing adequate pay and supplies to Cuban doctors. Guevara’s perceptions of Latin America, though limited by his shortsighted ideals of gender, still shows how his beliefs are influenced by both race and class. 


The Palestinian people and their struggle were also close to Che's heart. IMonths after the victory of the Cuban Revolution, Che landed in Gaza wearing his dark military fatigues on 18 June 1959 after travelling about 450km from Cairo.  He received a hero's welcome from the Egyptian de facto governor of Gaza, General-Lieutenant Ahmad Salim, as well as from Palestinian officials and heads of municipalities and many ordinary people.   
One of Che's goals for the visit was to support Arab and Palestinian national liberation and revolutionary movements against western imperialism and colonisation, recognising US imperialism's complicity with the Zionist state, and observing the Palestinian displacement and dire conditions, Guevara remarked to Cuban Commander Omar Fernández Cañizares, “Look, this is the work of the Gringos ”  


 With Guevara, hero of the Cuban Revolution, at the mansion of the Governor General, Lieutenant General Ahmad Salim. Gaza, 1959.

 During his short visit, he toured several Palestinian refugee camps including Al-Buraij camp, where he was welcomed with chants from the Cuban revolution.Witnessing first hand  the devastation and dispossession of the Nakba, a Palestinian refugee in Rafah approached Che Guevara and asked that the Cubans tell the Americas the truth of what they witnessed there. Guevara hugged the refugee and replied Cuba would denounce  their oppression “before all of humanity.” 
Zulfiqar Swirjo, an official affiliated to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine stated during a previous interview that his father was there during that historic visit that aimed to share Guevara's beliefs and revolutionary ideas with Gaza's fighters They had wanted to put together a strategic plan for a popular struggle to fight the Israeli forces using guerrilla warfare tactics. 
His visit transformed Palestinian resistance into part of a broader global anti-imperialist movement.
Cuba went on to welcome the founding of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, making official contact with it in 1965.  Since then the Revolutionary Government of Cuba have remained the staunchest supporters of  Palestine, and despite the emense difficulties imposed by the illegal US blokade provide all round material support to the Palestinian people. 
In 1962, he was one of the main architects of the Cuban Missile Crisis, when he was seemingly unconcerned at the risk of “millions of atomic war victims”. Early in his rule, at the height of the Cold War, Castro allied Cuba to the Soviet Union, which protected the Caribbean island and was its principal benefactor for three decades.
The alliance brought in $4 billion worth of aid annually, including everything from oil to guns, but also provoked the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis when the United States discovered Soviet missiles on the island. Convinced that the United States was about to invade Cuba, Castro urged the Soviets to launch a nuclear attack.Thankfully cooler heads prevailed. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev and U.S. President John F. Kennedy agreed the Soviets would withdraw the missiles in return for a U.S. promise never to invade Cuba. 
The United States also secretly agreed to remove its nuclear missiles from Turkey. When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, an isolated Cuba fell into a deep economic crisis that lasted for years and was known as the "special period". F
ood, transport and basics such as soap were scarce and energy shortages led to frequent and long blackouts. Castro undertook a series of tentative economic reforms to get through the crisis, including opening up to foreign tourism.The economy improved when Venezuela's socialist leader Hugo Chavez, who looked up to Castro as a hero, came to the rescue with cheap oil. 
Aid from communist-run China also helped, but an economic downturn in Venezuela since Chavez's death in 2013 have raised fears it will scale back its support for Cuba.Plagued by chronic economic problems, Cuba's population of 11 million has endured years of hardship, although not the deep poverty, violent crime and government neglect of many other developing countries.
While Britain and America were supplying arms to help Africa's apartheid regimes, Cuba was busy sending its men to fight them. Under Castro, Cuba had the best literacy rate in the world because it spent five times as much on education than war - the opposite of what America does. In fact, Cuba achieves the same health care system outcomes as the United States at only 5% the cost.
Lest we forget, Cuba was the biggest single provider of healthcare workers to the Ebola crisis in West Africa, more than all richer nations. Cuba has sent more doctors throughout the world to minister to the poor than even the World Health Organization despite Cuba's small size and meager resources. 
From Cubas support fighting Apartheid in South Africa, to training doctors from Latin America and its international medical brigades caring for the victims of earthquakes from Pakistan to Haiti, Cuba's model has shown that another world is possible.
Speaking at the United Nations in 1964, Guevara denounced apartheid, imperialism and the poverty of the Latin American masses. However, he rejected the pro-Soviet tendency in global and Cuban politics, and his thinking had moved towards a Maoist approach.
Perhaps partly for that reason, he decided to leave Cuba  First, Che Guevara travelled to Congo, unsuccessfully trying to promote resistance to Mobutu. He blamed incompetence and in-fighting for the failure. After that, he offered his services to FRELIMO in Mozambique, but they were declined.
In 1966, following his disappointments in Africa, Guevara disguised himself, and went to promote revolution in Bolivia. As a guerrilla commander, he scored impressive victories in ambush after ambush in Bolivia. Though he is credited with developing foco theory, Guevara never attempted to advance a new theory of guerrilla warfare.
He wanted to defeat American imperialism by launching guerrilla campaigns simultaneously in Asia, Africa, and Latin America, but his tricontinental strategy resulted in failures first in the Congo and then in Bolivia. And  perhaps because he favoured conflict to compromise, he was unable to develop good relations with local leaders.  He was a fighter, not a theorist. 
In addition, he was now up against the CIA and US Special Forces, his men lacked training and equipment, and his radio communications had failed. In the jungle, he became increasingly ill with asthma, having to make guerilla raids just to obtain medicine. 
His life ended tragically in Bolivia in 1967 when he was captured in Vallegrande, Bolivia during the Battle of Quebrada del Yuro. On October 9, 1969 he was executed on orders of the Bolivian President. A half-drunken sergeant shot him nine times, so that the authorities could say that Guevara had been killed trying to escape. CIA men were in close attendance. When Mario Terán, the soldier who would execute him, entered the room, Guevara reportedly said “I know you’ve come to kill me. Shoot, coward! You are only going to kill a man.”  His hands were cut off as proof of death. Guevara’s body was strapped to the skids of a helicopter and flown to Vallegrande, a small town 65 kilometres away, before being moved to an open-air laundry in the grounds of a hospital. It was here that the international press was summoned and the famous Christ-like photograph of his lifeless bearded corpse  taken by Bolivian photojournalist Freddy Alborta. 


Alborta's post mortem photo of Guevara,  1967

It is probable that Che would have been compared to Christ being taken down from the cross in any case. He was in his 30s when he died, he had long hair and a beard, and he gave his life for the cause of the working class and the peasants in a deeply Catholic country. And probably his image would only grown in its inspiration – that change would arrive in Bolivia and that the poor could eventually live in dignity.  But the photograph  that emerged seems to me to be a powerful visual and artistic reminder of Che’s redemptive powers.
Fearing that it might become a place of pilgrimage, the authorities decided not to bury the revolutionaries in the local cemetery. Instead, they were concealed in a mass grave in the corner of an airfield.


A mural dedicated to Che Guevara in Vallegrande, where his body was taken and displayed to the international press. This is now part of the Che Route, sponsored by the Bolivian government and foreign solidarity groups. 

In his last letter to his children, Guevara wrote  “Above all, always be capable of feeling deeply any injustice committed against anyone, anywhere in the world. This is the most beautiful quality in a revolutionary.
The legacy of Che Guevara is constantly evolving in the collective imagination. As a symbol of counterculture worldwide, Guevara is one of the most recognizable and influential revolutionary figures of the twentieth century. An icon of global popular culture, as well as a hero of Third World communist revolutionary movements and a symbol of the Western Leftist Movement. He remains a monumental figure in Latin American history, influencing a half-century of political ideals and movements. 
In Cuba, an economic blockade led the island to act in defiance of U.S. power, creating in its wake an internationalist foreign policy. Guevara played a key role in the ideology and action needed to carry out these policies. 
The Irish artist Jim Fitzpatrick created the graphic image of Che’s face in 1968. The poster bearing this image was shown at the Arts Laboratory in London. It quickly became the image used prominently in the student riots that swept across France in May 1968. 


Since then, Che’s face has been commodified, merchandised and objectified, appearing on T-shirts, ice cream wrappers, posters and mural art. His life is told in films, such as The Motorcycle Diaries (2004), in documentaries, plays, and in songs. 
Yet the rights to Che’s face are not owned by the Guevara family, but by the photographer and artist who created the image. The famous photograph of Guevara in a beret was taken by Alberto Korda (Alberto Díaz Gutiérrez) in 1960, titled Guerrillero Heroico (Heroic Guerrilla Warrior). British pop artist Sir Peter Blake regarded it as ‘one of the great icons of the 20th century.’ 
This photograph was the beginning of the commodification of the image of Che. Che’s image is an ever-present political and social emblem that has been morphed in popular culture. It operates as ‘both a fashionable de-politicized logo, as well as a potent anti-establishment symbol used by a wide spectrum of human rights movements and individuals affirming their own liberation.’  
Che’s image has become a counter-cultural symbol that operates independent of who he was as a person, metamorphosed from his life as a revolutionary appropriated into a work of art. Hannah Charlton writes in The Sunday Times (2006) that ‘Possibly more than the Mona Lisa, more than images of Christ, more than comparable icons such as the Beatles or Monroe, Che’s image has continued to hold the imagination of generation after generation.’ 
Marc Lacey writes in The New York Times (2006) that ‘40 years after his death Che is as much a marketing tool as an international revolutionary icon. Which raises the question of what exactly does the sheer proliferation of his image – the distant gaze, the scraggly beard and the beret adorned with a star – mean in a decidedly capitalist world?” Che’s image has been preserved in popular myth; a world devoid of its initial reality. The image’s commodification has lost its fear by the CIA, that of a revolution in Latin America. Today it makes money for corporations, which have no fear of nationalisation by Left-wing governments.  
Vladimir Lenin explains in The State and Revolution (1917) 

" During the lifetime of great revolutionaries, the oppressing classes constantly hounded them, received their theories with the most savage malice, the most furious hatred and the most unscrupulous campaigns of lies and slander. After their death, attempts are made to convert them into harmless icons, to canonize them, so to say, and to hallow their names to a certain extent for the ‘consolation’ of the oppressed classes and with the object of duping the latter, while at the same time robbing the revolutionary theory of its substance, blunting its revolutionary edge and vulgarizing it.this process of conversion from a feared political image into bourgeois icon. “

Journalist Herbert L. Matthews writes about Guevara in his book, Revolution  in  Cuba 

"His dedication to his revolutionary beliefs was deeply religious. Che had a missionary's faith in the innate goodness of man, in the ability of workers to dedicate themselves to ideals and to overcome selfishness and prejudices. It was the other side of the coin of his passionate indignation against injustice and exploitation of the humble. He saw the solution in an exalted form of Marxism that would bring freedom and brotherhood. Such men are born to be martyrs."
 
On his 98th birthday, I commemorate Comrade Che, who led the Glorious Cuban Revolution alongside Comrade Fidel, with an excerpt from the letter he sent to the Tricontinental—Three Continents Conference held in Havana in 1967:   

"We must not forget that imperialism is a world system, the final stage of capitalism, and that it must be defeated on a world scale. The strategic end of this struggle will be the destruction of imperialism. Our share falls to us, the exploited and underdeveloped of this world: to eliminate the foundations of imperialism. We, the oppressed nations, are dragged into absolute dependence by providing them with capital, raw materials, technicians, and cheap labor, and by receiving from them new instruments of domination in the form of new capital, weapons, and all kinds of materials.  
The fundamental element of this strategic objective will be the true liberation of all peoples. In many cases, this liberation will be achieved through armed struggle, and socialist revolution will be inevitable in Our America. 
While aiming for the destruction of imperialism, it is absolutely necessary to pinpoint who is leading it. This is none other than the USA.  A people that does not hate the enemy cannot defeat a brutal enemy.  And under the banner of the war waged for the salvation of humanity, we must develop a true proletarian internationalism with international proletarian armies.  
If, in the world, two, three, or more Vietnams were to emerge into the daylight with death claiming its toll on them, with their tremendous tragedies, their everyday heroism, and their ceaseless blows against imperialism, and with the growing hatred of the world's peoples shattering the forces of imperialism, we could look to the future with greater certainty!  Every one of our actions is a call to war against imperialism and a battle anthem for the unity of the peoples against the greatest enemy of humanity, the USA. "  

Che's short life reveals Cuba’s resilience in the struggle to provide the needs of the people through the Cuban Revolution, especially those whose ethnic identity and race are factors in their economic and political oppression.Time magazine selected him as one of the 100 Most Influential People of the 20th Century.
In death, Che Guevara would become the iconic symbol of revolutionary martyrdom; giving up his own life with no fear, for the cause of fighting oppression and liberating others. His ideas and actions inspired many leftist movements across Latin America and beyond, particularly among youth and radical groups in the 1960s.
Che  remains a polarizing figure; admired by some as a symbol of idealism and revolutionary dedication, a heroic defender of the oppressed and poor,while others criticize him as a violent adventurer, an executioner and the "Butcher Of la Cabaña" while Jean Paul-Sartre, Susan Sontag, Nelson Mandela and many others have regarded him as a hero and an inspiration, a man who was prepared to die for his beliefs. 
What made Che unique was the unorthodox current of Marxism-Leninism he represented. Unlike those who believed revolution had to wait until all the perfect material conditions emerged, Che argued that revolutionaries had a duty to create those conditions through struggle itself. His theory of guerrilla warfare held that even a small group of committed revolutionaries could spark broader popular movements rather than waiting indefinitely for history to move on its own.
He believed that revolution was not just an external process, but an internal, almost spiritual, struggle to develop new values, ethics, and forms of consciousness: the creation of a “New Man.”  
Che also rejected the idea that socialism could be built in one state and survive indefinitely in isolation, and his life reflected the belief that the struggle for socialism had to be global or risk total defeat.
 Che understood the centrality of ethics in politics, the centrality of subjective factors in revolution, leading to the rapid transformation of Cuban society into a giant school of reclaiming Cuban culture and ethical values.  
Hence, the literacy and “voluntary labour” campaigns, the advances in education and medicine, and the large scale involvement of people in movements for agrarian reform, housing reform, and so on. These movements and campaigns converted idealistic goals into on-the-ground realities that have continued to evolve, making possible what one could have never imagined even in one’s wildest dreams.  
Rejecting the use of capitalist methods to fight capitalism, Che alongside Fidel Castro used the methods of socialist praxis to transform what began as a national liberation struggle into a socialist revolution that would transform institutions and social and human relations through an organised and conscious “praxis” that—despite errors recognised publicly by both of them and their successors—continues till today.  
Che also repeatedly warned about the dangers of not seeing the deficiencies of “existing socialism” and of mechanically copying Soviet manuals and methods. He had spoken about this often, and this is also explicitly stated in his writings preserved in Cuba and available around the world. He observed that the “intransigent dogmatism of the Stalin era has been succeeded by an inconsistent pragmatism . . . returning to capitalism.” 
He saw the actions and programmes of the Cuban Revolution as “clashing with what one reads in the (Soviet) textbooks” and contributed insightful socialist critiques of both capitalist and socialist societies and their theories.  
History has never agreed on what to make of him. His story resists simplicity. What remains certain is that he lived—and died—according to absolute conviction. In the final hours before leaving for a war he would not survive, he was thinking about his children. Not about fame. Not about legacy. But about what values he hoped they would carry forward. “Study and read diligently,” he wrote. “Remember that an individual has no value alone.” Stand for something. Learn everything you can. Never be indifferent to suffering." 
In July 1997, his remains were discovered; and sent back to Cuba, where they were reburied in a ceremony attended by President Fidel Castro and thousands of Cubans.In October, the Council of State of Cuba issued a notice designating the period from the 11th to the 17th of that month as a national period of mourning, and his remains were interred at the Che Guevara Square in Santa Clara. 
Comrade Che dedicated his life to the struggle against the imperialist bandits who oppress and exploit the world's peoples, chief among them the greatest enemy of the human race, the USA. 
Che, like Fidel, was profoundly committed to the cause of peace, but unfortunately had to take up arms to move the world closer to that ephemeral goal. To make a world without war possible, Che gave his life, even as Fidel did. We can learn much from their examples. The best tribute we can now make is to continue the struggle to end the immoral and unjust blockade of Cuba and for the return of the illegally occupied land at Guantanamo Bay.                           

At the risk of seeming ridiculous, let me say that the true revolutionary is guided by a great feeling of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality. If you tremble with indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine.  ”  -Ernesto 'Che' Guevara 

Salute . Comrade Che is immortal! Patria o muerte y venceremos! 


Photo: an activist paints a mural honouring Che on the apartheid wall in the occupied West Bank.

Monday, 8 June 2026

8 June 1949 Secker & Warburg publishes George Orwell's novel "Nineteen Eighty-Four"

 

8 June 1949 Secker & Warburg publishes George Orwell's dystopian speculative fiction novel "Nineteen Eighty-Four". The title is the year he wrote it with the last two digits swapped. 

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” 

"War is peace. 
Freedom is slavery. 
Ignorance is strength."

Few novels have entered the political bloodstream like this one. Written as a warning against totalitarianism, the novel imagined a world of constant surveillance, rewritten history, controlled language, and enforced loyalty to “Big Brother.”  
Many of the themes in Nineteen Eighty-Four are compelling and contemporary, foreshadowing the state of our world today and contain remarkable foresight  given that it was first published in 1949. 
The novel is set in 1984 in Great Britain, known as Airstrip One.The world has suffered through a global atomic war, and there are 3 superpowers called Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia. 
The standard of living is relatively low.The media is run by the government, which is known as Big Brother and the written word is perpetually changed to suit what the government requires. 
People are controlled into what to think, how to act and how to live .It uses telescreens, fearmongering, media control and corruption to control the masses
One of the Party pillars in 1984 is endless war on a global scale. The war, however, is a fabrication accepted and treated as fact. For, unreal as it is, it is not meaningless. World powers become enemies and allies interchangeably simply to keep the masses in perpetual fear, perpetual industry, and perpetual order. 
War provides outlet for unwanted emotions such as hate, patriotism, and discontent, keeping the structure of society intact and productive without raising the standard of living. The state of perpetual war described by Orwell is also reflected in the wars  that have raged since 1945, across the globe from Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen etc etc.   
Winston Smith the main protagonist is  an editor employed by the government and is one of many citizens responsible for rewriting history.In Nineteen Eighty-Four, government surveillance is constant and at the forefront. The state knows every move its citizens make, including their habits, whom they talk to, and what they are doing at any given time. Big Brother is watching and running the show. The people are sheep who are herded and controlled. 
Throughout the book, Winston Smith, Orwell’s everyman, represents how “normal people” are forced under the guide of indistinct manipulation to conform to every wish and desire Big Brother can generate. The masses cannot know otherwise, only goodthink–which in Newspeak (the official language of Oceania), roughly translates to orthodoxy–is permissible. Notice the subtlety. Orthodoxy doesn’t necessarily imply goodness. 
Yet the whole point of Newspeak is to constrict speech so as to make it impossible for heretical thoughts to be produced – after all, if you do not have maximum access to language, how can you mount a defense for yourself? How can you challenge external things when you have no way to articulate it? To think a “wrong” thought is thoughtcrime and to survive you must cancel it out (crimestop) and convince yourself that you believe something different and often contradictory (doublethink). Any thought, even one born of instinctive curiosity, is to be totally and completely suppressed forever.   
How does Big Brother maintain this system of control? Do the masses not attempt to revolt? The low-class citizenry in “1984” are referred to as the “Proles,” and Big Brother keeps these people in line (the majority population) by loosening their control over them. Instead of being distracted with oppression, the Proles work tirelessly and are distracted with endless entertainment.Thus, they are effectively a non-issue.
Party members, on the contrary, are hermetically sealed within the confines of Party control. Every move and utterance they make is under close scrutiny, even in the most private parts of their home. The goal is to enforce goodthink and, over time, to contort one’s mind to the extent they trust Big Brother’s instincts over their own. It is not simply maintaining an allegiance; it’s about believing in Big Brother’s omnipotence with every fiber of your being.  
Winston Smith embarks on a clandestine love affair with Julia, a party member, and joins The Brotherhood, an illegal organisation dedicated to the overthrow of Big Brother. He is caught,and taken to Room 101, alongside everyone else who offended is taken and subjected to torture and brainwashed and he along with everyone ends up loving Big Brother. 
One might wait for a silver-lining, a breakthrough where Big Brother’s control is challenged and overturned to the masses; however, this time never comes. This bottled anxiety that buries itself in your shoulders while you read is what I believe Orwell intended for. It represents the pervasiveness of totalitarianism. 
Orwell did not just write a dystopian novel. He gave us a vocabulary for recognising power when it lies, watches, rewrites, manipulates and demands obedience.  
Published in post-war Britain, Nineteen Eighty-Four became one of the most chilling warnings ever written about authoritarianism, surveillance, propaganda and the destruction of truth.  
Its genius is that it does not only imagine a state that controls what people do. It imagines a state that wants to control what people can say, what they can remember, what they are allowed to believe, and eventually what they are capable of thinking.  
That is why it still feels so uncomfortable. Every generation finds its own version of 1984: mass surveillance, media manipulation, censorship, culture wars, disinformation, rewritten history, online monitoring and powerful people telling the public not to believe what is right in front of them. 
Orwell understood that freedom does not always disappear in one dramatic moment. Sometimes it is chipped away quietly - word by word, lie by lie, fear by fear - until people begin censoring themselves.  1984 remains terrifying because it is not just about one nightmare future. It is about how easily truth can be broken when power decides reality belongs to them.  
More than 75 years later, its vocabulary continues to spark intrigue and debate about its themes of censorship, totalitarianism, and historical revisionism —Big Brother, Thought Police, Newspeak, doublethink, Room 101—  and still shapes how we talk about power, propaganda, and the loss of truth.
Today across the world there are a lock-up concentration camp style jails where unconvicted, ostensibly innocent individuals are held and openly abused. Electronic surveillance is now a common and accepted government practice: cell phone listening, cameras on corners and traffic lights, and electronic toll payment system tracking are all everyday occurrences.
 By using our credit cards, shopping rewards cards, and even our driver's licenses, data are collected on all of us and sold and used daily, each of us daily profiled. 
Orwell’s book  was supposed to be a warning, not a guidebook on how to create a surveillance state. It really is remarkable how the many tools that were used to suppress in Nineteen Eighty–Four  are now part of our  everyday lives in 2020. Newspeak is the fictional language spoken in Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is a controlled and abbreviated version of English.  Also  known as “doublespeak!”. As George himself said " Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.. "  
Politicians continue to  use language to deceive and manipulate, through concealment or misrepresentation of the truth, desperately and deliberately using euphemistic or ambiguous language as they have been doing ad infinitum. One of the objectives of Newspeak is also to decrease self-expression. With the  popularity of texting, it would be fair to say that there are similarities. A
nd today we are so busy Facebooking, tweeting, etc,  the following line  from one of the characters that works for  Big Brother.  “The people will not revolt. They will not look up from their screens long enough to notice what’s happening.” is  still amazingly uncanny.
Orwell may not have had a crystal ball, but  he did have was an understanding of the human condition and its weakness. Orwell began writing the novel in 1944, and wrote the bulk of it while residing on the Scottish island Jura with no electricity and no running water.  
Orwell  was recently widowed, his wife having died during a surgical procedure. He was left with his young son, and he was seriously ill with tuberculosis. There was not a known cure for TB in 1947, and physicians typically prescribed fresh air and rest. Orwell was given streptomycin, which was an experimental drug in the US. He raced to finish his novel, and finished the manuscript in December 1948 and upon publication it became an instant success. Orwell died shortly after of a brain  He died fourteen months later at the age of 46. 
To write a book and not live long enough to see it gradually leave literature and enter the dictionary. Most novels grow old. Some even die. "1984" did something far more disturbing. It stayed. And continued waiting for each new generation with the patience of an old professor who knows perfectly well that his students will eventually arrive at exactly the same mistaken conclusions as their predecessors. 
Eric Arthur Blair lived only forty-six years. Yet sometimes I think Orwell's real life began only after his death. Because there are writers who create books. And there are writers who create concepts.That is an entirely different category of literary immortality. The greatest irony is that today almost everyone knows who Big Brother is. Far fewer remember the name of the man who invented him. Which, quite honestly, is so Orwellian that Orwell himself would probably have laughed.
Nineteen Eighty-Four has been in publication ever since, has been translated into multiple languages, and is often heralded as one of the best novels of the 20th century. Still resonating in the times we live today, still worryingly reliable. Commenting on 1984, Orwell wrote, “I do not believe that the kind of society I describe necessarily will arrive, but I believe that something resembling it could arrive.”
In some cases, what is happening in the world today is more draconian and invasive than anything Orwell conceived. Despite Orwell's influence political journalism is as corrupt as ever. The corruption of language described in 1984 is widespread in the media today, with "Newspeak" terms such as democratic, socialist, fascist, war criminal, freedom fighter, racist and many other expressions being used in a deliberately deceptive, propagandistic way to whip up mass hysteria or simply to ensure that people can never achieve even an approximation of the truth. 
We are today all living in a massive prison and George Orwell predicted it. The ability of Big Brother government to observe our every activity is increasing week by week and soon each and every car journey we make, every financial transaction we undertake, everywhere we go will be fed into a computer and if there is a slight variance from what they decide is the norm then we will be taken in and questioned. 
Give the wrong answers and you could well end up in room like 101, or Belmarsh Jail, Guantanamo Bay etc.If this does not bother you, then carry on, you might be  comfortable that 'Big Brother' is watching you, but I ask you who is watching Big Brother. Could someone tell the government and the opposition, because they don't seem to have been kicking up much of a fuss, that the George Orwell's book 1984 was a warning not an instruction manual. We should continue to be on guard, raise alarms, be objective, keep questioning and hold our individual Governments to account. 
In 2003 a docudrama was released by the BBC, detailing the life and works of George Orwell. The documentary contains footage from his deathbed, and his final words are certainly chilling. You can here them in the following video. We can't say that we were never warned. 1984 has had a lasting impact on literature and culture, with its concepts and terminology widely adopted in popular culture. Is Nineteen Eighty-Four still the most important political novel ever written?


There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.

Citizens  today should support bona fide civil liberties groups and actively oppose government measures restricting basic freedoms. Freedom of speech is a basic civil liberty and people should fight to retain it. They should defy group pressure, think for themselves and speak out. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.We should continue to be on guard, raise alarms, be objective, keep questioning and hold our individual Governments to account.  

We  are the dead. Our only true life is in the future. We shall take part in it as handfuls of dust and splinters of bone. But how far away that future may be, there is no knowing. It might be a thousand years. At present nothing is possible except to extend the area of sanity little by little. We cannot act collectively. We can only spread our knowledge outwards from individual to individual, generation after generation. In the face of the Thought Police there is no other way.”   - George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty- Four




Sunday, 7 June 2026

Defying the Universe — Samah Sabawi

 

 Art "Behind the Wall" (2026) by Sara Khayat 

Defying the Universe- Samah Sabawi  

Are your loved ones trapped behind the wall 
Do they need the army’s permission
For their prayers to reach the sky 
For their love to cross the ocean 
And touch your thirsty heart 
Are your loved ones trapped  

Do you yearn to be in your family home 
And when you call them 
Do they always say  

“we are well, alhamdollelah” 
Does it surprise you  

That they are whole  

But you… you are broken 
Must they always worry about you 
Urge you to have faith in your exile 
Must they pity you 
For not breathing the air 

Of your ancestors’ land 
Must they always comfort you 
Even when the bombs are falling 
Do you ever wonder who is walled in 
Is it you, or is it them 
And when it finally dawns upon you 
That their dignity sets them free 
Do you feel ashamed of your liberty  

Are your loved ones trapped behind the wall 
Do they tell you stories 
Of how they survive 
The trees they’ve replanted 
The homes they’ve rebuilt 
Do they assure you life goes on 
Old men still fiddle with their prayer beads 
Mothers still bake mamoul on Eid 
Families still gather under the canopies 
With loaded bunches of grapes 
Dangling above their heads T
hey nibble on watermelon seeds 
They drink meramiah tea 
Women perfect the art of match-making 
Men talk of freedom and democracy 
Children climb on a sycamore tree 
Lovers woe in secrecy 
And no matter how the conditions are adverse 
Do your loved ones defy this universe 
Your loved ones defy this universe

Dr Samah Sabawi is an award-winning  Palestinian author, playwright, poet..scholar, and political commentator   born in Gaza whose work weaves art and resistance into powerful expressions of identity, memory, and hope .Samah  wrote Defying the Universe during the aftermath of Israel’s assault on Gaza in 2008-2009. 
Her memoir Cactus Pear for My Beloved has been shortlisted for the 2025 Stella Prize, The Age Book of the Year and the NSW Literary Awards Douglas Stewart Prize, the book was also highly commended by the Victoria Premier’s Literary Awards. Sabawi’s theatre credits include the award-winning plays Tales of a City by the Sea (2016) and THEM (2019). In 2020 Samah received the prestigious Green Room Award for Best Writing in the independent theatre category and was shortlisted for both the NSW and the Victorian Premier’s Literary Awards.She is currently residing in Melbourne Australia. https://samahsabawi.com/about-samah-sabawi/
While Sabawi’s poem expresses the guilt Palestinians in diaspora feel when thinking of loved ones back home, Jelec’s animation video tries to take the message further so it can resonate with a larger audience.


Video animation by Marta Jelec  

Music: Bonobo- Recurring  

Marta Jelec made this stop motion animation for a project she’s did for a Digital and Cyberculture Studies module. She explains “Sabawi’s poem, originally written in English and published online, describes the internal struggles her husband faces when confronting the guilt of leaving his family behind in Palestine, while he lives his life of ‘liberty’. By creating an animation of the poem, I aim to make the poetry more accessible to an English speaking, non Palestinian audience, by using non-ethnicised characters and simple and symbolic imagery. I aim to increase the possibility of empathy within digital audiences outside of Palestine”.

Sara Khayat is a feminist graphic designer, illustrator, and visual artist from Syria. She was born in Damascus and studied graphic design at the International University for Science and Technology (IUST Syria), located in the city of Ghabagheb.  
Khayat’s work is focused on women’s, LGBTQI+, and refugee rights, using illustration and graphic design to support a wide range of social justice causes, including challenging gender stereotypes and gender-based violence. 
Sara has worked for and with a variety of organisations across Turkey, Lebanon, and Europe. Since the beginning of the Syrian Civil War in 2011, Khayat has worked on documenting human rights violations by all parties involved in the conflict and the oral histories of women detained by the Syrian regime.
Sara Khayat has been involved in campaigns and advocacy missions through organisations such as Right to Remain UK, and Liberated T, sponsored by the Institute of War and Peace Reporting, amongst others. 
As a freelance designer, Sara has worked with several civil society organisations, including the Syrian Child Protection Network, The A Project, and Dammeh, focused on the rights of children, women, and LGBTQI+ people. 
Due to the focus and the nature of her work, Sara Khayat fled Syria for Turkey in 2015. 
At the beginning of 2023, Sara arrived in Sweden and took up the ICORN residency in Gävle City of Refuge.  In Sweden, Sara continues her work, including an art project exploring the connection between the human body and its surrounding, and plans to collaborate with local artists working on mutual topics of interest.  
You can find more about   Sara Khayat’s art  here   at her portfolio https://sarakhayat.com/about-me/ and  at Behance https://www.behance.net/sarakhayat

Wednesday, 3 June 2026

Shame on Nigel Farage. Shame on Reform UK.

 
 
Nigel Farage has decided to abandon attempts to shed his far-right image and decided instead to move even further to the right, echoing the language of the racist BNP during a ‘national address’, in a naked attempt to exploit a horrific murder in order to whip up hatred and division.  
Just when many of you thought Farage couldn’t sink any lower, he has done so. Following the horrific murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak, Farage has been widely condemned for exploiting the murder to create ‘grievance and division’. 
Fearing being outflanked by the likes of Rupert Lowe and Restore, Farage chose to go full-throttle far-right himself, dismissing the concerns of Henry’s family who specifically said they did not want his murder to be used to “create further hatred, division or tension.”  That he has done so, shows in the words of Keir Starmer, ‘exactly who he is’. 
Henry was brutally murdered last year in a terrible attack. But newly released footage of how the police reacted at the scene have caused shockwaves across the UK, leading to Henry's family speaking out.  
In stark contrast, Nigel Farage - leader of the Reform UK Party - has said we should react to Henry Nowak’s appalling murder with ‘pure cold rage’and proclaiming 'white lives matter'in response to the murder and its surrounding circumstances.
And with 11 officers and a police dog injured at protests last night, politicians need to remember what they say actually matters.The violence that broke out in Southampton yesterday is a stark reminder of the real-world consequences when fear and division are deliberately stoked.  
We saw it after Southport. We saw where it led. Violence followed. Communities were targeted. Fear spread. And now we are seeing the same forces attempting to use Henry’s death to tell a story about white victimhood and racial conflict.  
Yet Farage says that last night's terrifying violent disorder in Southampton is 'just the beginning' He tells us that 'the division will get far worse because 'large numbers of young white males think the police are prejudiced against them  'The division will get far worse. What you saw in Southampton last night is the beginning  'If we get large numbers of young white males who think the police are prejudiced against them, goodness knows where we go. This has to end'"  
Over the last 36 hours, we have witnessed the very soul of Nigel Farage, his essence. It has been over a month since he went into hiding, since serious questions began to be raised over his undeclared £5M donation.  
A month since he appeared in front of TV cameras or underwent any questioning at all. At 8am yesterday morning, Farage released a video, from a field somewhere, calling for rage. Calling for an end to the mythical two-tier policing.  
Make no mistake, those were very carefully chosen words — he understood what he was unleashing, and his wish was granted last night in Southampton.  
On Tuesday, the Home Secretary made a statement to the House regarding the murder of Henry Nowack. There was, as always, an opportunity to question Shabana Mahmood. Was Nigel Farage in attendance? No, of course not.  
Today, Farage was granted a question at PMQs, the showpiece spectacle of the political week in which the country's news and politics fanatics tune in to watch. Was Nigel Farage in attendance? Yes, of course he   bloody  was. He had somehow found his way into work after missing 77 separate votes in Parliament because  he would, at least for three minutes, be the centre of the country's political attention.  
His question was about the murder of Henry Nowack and the violence that erupted on his command last night, but he would not condemn it or call for calm. Instead, he 'suggested' that this rioting might escalate.  
The overwhelming majority of people find Farage's words abhorrent. He has stoked division and incited violence to gain political points against the wishes of Henry Nowak's family. He has badly misjudged the mood  of  the  country and will lose a lot of support over this. and is now fully aligned in people's minds alongside Tommy Robinson and the rest of the far right who were there in  Southampton.
This afternoon, he has performatively written to the BBC because someone on Newsnight dared to accuse him of inciting the violence. playing his perpetual victim card. Again.  
And there we see the soul of Nigel Farage a craven, hate filled, narcissistic. grubby little opportunist of  the lowest  order, desperate for attention, an  evil, petty and pointless pure scum of a  man. 
Farage is a Grifter not a politician who has made an entire career about hating people, about division, about “them” being bad for “us”  and  the  exploitation of the under educated . He is doing it again, against the wishes of a father of a murdered son, because that is all he has and all he is. Hate. Rage. Culture war. 
His language is very dangerous in these times,He doesn’t want to improve this nation he wants to divide it, he wants to profit from it  and laugh in the faces of all those daft enough to believe in him.  and it is more than  time to hold Farage to account. 
The violent clashes with police in Southampton are the clearest warning of where Nigel Farage’s politics of hate leads. Officers were injured, communities were frightened, and public anger was pushed into the streets. This followed the tragic killing of Henry Nowak and the grave police mistake of handcuffing him as he lay dying:There is a real scandal here. Henry Nowak was telling officers he couldn’t breathe, while the man who stabbed him was initially treated as the victim because he lied. That is horrifying. Hampshire Police have apologised. The IOPC is investigating. One officer has resigned. The Attorney General is reviewing the sentence. Grant all of that. Henry was failed and the case  demands truth, justice and accountability. 
But Farage chose not to calm tensions. He chose to exploit grief, turn it into racial anger and use a tragedy as a political weapon. The UK deserves justice, not hatred.Whatever terrible failures occurred in Henry’s case, and however serious they may prove to be, the attempt to turn this tragedy into evidence that white people are now the primary victims of racial prejudice turns reality on its head.  
The reality is that racial inequality has not disappeared from Britain. For people from ethnic minority backgrounds being treated with suspicion remains an ordinary part of life. According to the latest Home Office figures, for example, Black people are stopped and searched by police at nearly four times the rate of white people. For searches linked to suspected weapons, the disparity is even higher. Racial abuse remains commonplace. Discrimination in housing, employment and public life remains. 
Yet the far right wants to persuade people that anti-racism itself is now the real injustice. 
Make no mistake, Reform are pushing us down a very dark and dangerous place.The contrast between Nigel Farage's opportunistic hate to divide people, his inability to serve anyone but himself, and the Sikhs' selfless service could not be more stark. 
Farage is an absolute disgrace of a human being. Would love to see him deported for this sort of baiting of violence. Never thought a human being could be so morally inept to bring the tragic death of a boy into politics like this to create such division.Farages "pure cold rage" means violent racists giving Nazi salutes. Farage and Reform are a danger to the whole UK. Shame  on  them. 
Am  not a  huge  admirer  but  have  to give credit to Keir Starmer for the way he handled Farage  in PMQs today, "This is a time for serious work, not rage," Keir Starmer told MPs, “Henry Nowak’s family have shown extraordinary dignity after their son’s life. There are serious questions to answer - like how accusations of racism impacted police thinking.  But there is no justification for violence," he said.
The terrified people of Southampton did not want a gang of racist thugs carrying out mayhem on their streets with the  support of Reform MPs who seem to think being racist is a vote winner.
Farage should be arrested and  removed from Parliament, his racist dreadful views may attract support but I am sure the majority would hate to see a repeat of what happened in Southampton on their doorstep. There was nothing to be gained. 
Farage and Reform have made themselves look foolish and insensitive. All because they’ve done what the family of Henry Nowak asked Parliamentarians not  to  do. 
It is up to each of us to stop this hatred and stop reform  from defining our country. There is another way. The politics of division depends on people feeling frightened, isolated and resentful. It depends on us seeing one another as enemies. 
At a time when the politics of extremist hatred becomes  louder in a bid to fuel division and hatred, it  must be opposed more than ever. Enough of Reform UK and Farage's  sowing of malcontent and hate and division and the blatants  opportunism over the  tragic murder of a young man.

Sign the open letter to demand Nigel Farage - as leader of the Reform UK Party - stops this shameful behaviour?

Celebrating Pride Month


June is Pride Month across much of the world, a hugely important 30 days to celebrate, uplift and champion the LGBT+  people, cultures, communities and resistance in its fullness.Pride Month is more than just parades and rainbow flags. It’s a powerful reminder of the struggles and triumphs that have paved the way for LGBTQ+ acceptance and visibility, and a celebration of LGBTQ+ culture and self-worth.
With worldwide events throughout the years, equality has taken massive steps forward. Gay marriage is legal in many countries now, people are more comfortable being out, and violence against the LGBTQ+ community has declined. 
But the freedoms aren’t universal, and there is still persecution in many places.This Pride month comes at a time when it all too often feels like things are moving backwards rather than forwards for the LGBT+ community – and particularly for our trans community.
Across the world, LGBTQ+ communities continue to face persecution, criminalisation and political attack. In the UK, the impact of recent legal and political developments has intensified hostility towards trans people and threatens hard-won rights, dignity and access to public life. Globally, anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and rhetoric continue to put lives at risk. Remember Pride has always been political. It began as a protest and a riot.
In the early morning hours of June 28, 1969, the New York City  police department carried out a raid on the Stonewall Inn, a  popular Gay Bar in the Greenwich Village .
The move was a clear condemnation by law enforcement officials of the city's underground gay population .Yes it was a dive bar, but even that characterisation was optimistic, since it couldn't get a ligour license. It's drinks were bootlegged and heavily watered down. The contents of no bottle ever matched its label. There were no fire exits and there was no running water. 
But in that Greenwich Village Tavern, there was music, there was dancing, and there was freedom. It was a place of sanctuary, and one of the only places for New York's gay community to socialise and truly be themselves. 
Pror to 1962, same sex relationships were a felony in every state, making it illegal for people of the same sex to show affection towards one another, dance with each other or even just be together. often punished by lengthy prison sentences. 
Same-sex loving men and women met in secret, fearing the long-term consequences of exposure. Gender nonconforming indiiduals and cross-dressers might find themselves shunned to the fringes of society. Early efforts at LGBTQ+ activism had smoldered for years before Stonewall. 
There had been riots in other gay spaces before. And there had certainly been plenty of police raids at the Stonewall in the past. But the anger that erupted on this day when police attempted to arrest patrons of the Stonewall Inn, sparked a uprising that galvanised the LGBTQ+ civil rights movement as we know it today. 
It was a raid like so many others, but this time after some patrons and local residents witnessed  police barging into the bar, slamming people against the walls, calling them derogatory names, and then taking money from their wallets. 
When police finally let patrons out of the bar and ordered them to disperse they refused, and after an officer struck a prisoner on the head, they spontaneously fought back against years of oppression by hurling rocks and bottles at the police, anything in fact within arm's reach.
A number of people even wrestled a parking meter from the ground and tried to use it as a battering ram. The police, fearing for their safety, locked themseles inside the Stonewall Inn as the angry mob outside grew into the thousands. 
Some were attempting to set the property on fire.Following media coverage of the event, thousands protested and clashed with riot police over the next six days.Reinforcements were eventually able to get the crowd under control, well for one night at least. But people had discovered a power that they were not even aware they had, releasing a sense of pride and liberation.    
Shouts of 'gay power' and 'we shall overcome' could be heard down the street as support spread.It was a watershed for the worldwide gay rights movement, because it was the first time LGBTQ+ people had forcibly resisted the police. On Saturday, the windows of the Stonewall were boarded up and painted with gueer liberation slogans like 'We are Open,' 'Support Gay Power- C'mon in girls.' Hostile press coverage was also pinned to the boards, That night the crowd of protestors returned and were led in gay power cheers by a group of gay cheerleaders. 
There was sustained handholding, kissing, and posing which had appeared only fleetingly on the street before. Soon the crowd got restless "Let's go down the street and see what's happening girls," someone yelled. They did and were confronted by the Tactical Patrol Force, (originally set up to stop anti-vietnam war protests) Howeer, the TPF failed to break up the crowd, who in defiance sprayed them with rocks and other projectiles. 
The third day of rioting fell five days after the raid on the Stonewall Inn. On that day 1,000 people congregated at the bar and again took the cops on in the streets. Once the riots had subsided, protestors were filled with motivation to organise for their rights, the aftermath saw an explosion in gay movement organisation, pride and political activism. A year after the  riots, residents began marching on Christopher Street and Sixth Avenue. The date, June 28 was dubbed Christopher Street Liberation Day. Thousands of people marched the street while thousands of other people lined up alongside them to protest the treatment of theLGBTQ+ community at the hands of the law. With Stonewall, the spirit of 60's rebellion spread to LGBTQ+ people in New York and beyond, who found themseles liberated and part of a community, sparking a new sense of urgency about demanding tolerance for persecuted communities.
Inspired by New Yor's example, actiists in other cities including Los Angeles, San Fracisco, Boston and Chicago, organised gay pride celebrations that same year. The Stonewall uprising changed the state of play, and sent out a clear message that enough was enough and that it was time for the harassment and discrimination to end. 
It is important to recognise the fact the gay rights movement did not begin at Stonewall, there were gay activists  and calls for "gay power"well before tht early morning of June 28, 1969. What was different about Stonewall was that gay activists around the country and the world were prepared to commemorate it publicly. 
It was not the first rebellion, but it was the first to be called "the first" and that act of naming mattered, the uprising did mark a turning point, igniting a new atmosphere of militant gay liberation. Radical groups like the libertarian left wing Gay Liberation Front (GLF)  and the Gay Activists Alliance (GAA), were formed  in New York and beyond who sought links with the Black Panthers, the Womens Liberation movement and anti-war organisations. 
Similar organisations were soon created around the world including Canada, France, Brtain, Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand, becoming a lasting force that would carry on for the next half-century and beyond.      
The Stonewall Inn made headlines again in 2015, when its story came to the silver screen,  but critics at the time said that Stonewall depicted brave, cisgender white males as the unsung heroes of the movement, but in reality it was trans women of color, homeless queer people, sex workers, gay bi and pansexual people who were the riots heart and soul.    
The resisters who stood up to the police on this day could hardly have imagined that within 50 years, the United States and other Western countries would go from criminalising homosexuality to guranteering the equal right of same sex couples to marry. 
Despite the gains made since and why we celebrate Pride in June, ( beyond the sequins and the glitter, it remains a protest, not just an excuse to party) half a century on from the Stonewall Riots, the global LGBTQ+ community still faces significent problems. 
It was only as recently as 2017 that the UK Government finally issued a posthumous pardon to all gay or bi men who were convicted under pernicious sexual offences laws in the last century which enabled police to criminalise people for being gay or bi. 
In many South Asian and Middle Eastern, in fact around 70 counties  homosexuality is still illegal and in around 70 countries ,as far as the law goes punishable by death.Anti-gay bullying is still prevalent in schools and workplaces and anti LGBTQ+ sentiment is still being combatted across the world, Sadly there is still to much stigma attached for being who we are. 
But for many that fight has its roots in those dramatic riots in Greenwich all those years ago. The LGBTQ+  movement is still a work in progress, so any single acronym is just a working title. Many other groups could be added to the acronym, including queer, intersex, and loving people of all kinds who just don't fit in the conventional pink and blue boxes of gender. This movement is a rainbow coalition of communities.
The struggle will continue as long as governments do not fully respect and protect the "inherent dignity" and "egual and inalienable rights of all members of the human family" , as the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights so eloquently pronounces, regardless of their gender identity, gender expression, or sexual orientation. 
When we remember the Stonewall Rebellion, we should aso commit to common memory, think of the many rebels who thought they might be alone but found common ground in movements of popular resistance.We still have so much further to go in the fight for equality. With on going solidarity with other oppressed people across the world, with rage and love we can firmly find  our pride. The legacy of Stonewall remains as important as ever.
Pride marches and events honour this legacy, fostering a space for advocacy, celebration, and community support. It was only a few years later, back on July 1st 1972, when UK's first official Pride march historically took place in London, where an estimated 2,000 people attended as a courageous display of solidarity and defiance in the face of widespread discrimination.
It marked the beginning of a movement that would grow in strength and visibility over the following decades.Early Pride events in the UK served as demonstrations advocating for equal rights and the decriminalisation of homosexual acts, transforming over the years into vibrant festivals occurring across major cities like Manchester, Brighton, and London.  
The 1967 Sexual Offences Act partially decriminalised homosexuality, yet many LGBTQ+ individuals continued facing legal challenges, prompting further protests.Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Pride events proliferated across the UK, reflecting the community’s resilience and the increasing public support for LGBTQ+ rights.  
Pride in the UK has seen significant milestones over the years. The decriminalization of homosexuality in England and Wales in 1967, Scotland in 1980, and Northern Ireland in 1982 laid the groundwork for further legal advancements. 
The introduction of Section 28, often known as ‘don’t say gay’, in 1988, which prohibited the “promotion” of homosexuality by local authorities, was met with fierce opposition and protest, further galvanizing the LGBTQ+ movement. The repeal of Section 28 in 2003 marked a significant victory for LGBTQ+ rights.  
The 21st century has witnessed landmark achievements such as the legalization of same-sex marriage in England, Wales, and Scotland in 2014 and in Northern Ireland in 2020. These legal advancements have been celebrated at Pride events, underscoring the progress made and the ongoing fight for equality.  Today Pride remains a crucial celebration for several reasons. Firstly, it serves as a powerful reminder of the struggles and sacrifices of those who fought for LGBTQ+ rights. Recognising this history is essential in understanding the progress made and the work still to be done.  
Secondly, Pride events provide a platform for visibility and representation. For many LGBTQ+ individuals, especially those in areas where acceptance may be lacking, Pride offers a sense of community and belonging. It is an opportunity to celebrate their identities openly and without fear.  Moreover, Pride fosters education and awareness. It challenges prejudices and misconceptions, promoting a culture of acceptance and understanding. Through Pride, allies can show their support, and broader society can learn about the diverse experiences and challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community.  
Pride is more than a celebration; it is a powerful movement grounded in history and driven by the unwavering quest for equality. As we march forward, let us remember the past, celebrate the present, and strive for a future where diversity is not just acknowledged but embraced wholeheartedly. 
It’s important to note that the level of acceptance and the ability to hold public Pride events can vary greatly in many countries around the world. Many LGBTQ+ individuals face significant legal and social challenges, which can impact the visibility and safety of Pride celebrations.
I hope this pride month is one of continued celebration and solidarity. While I reflect on the history of pride and recognise that the struggles of the past have seen tremendous progress on LGBT+ issues, that progress is only won through continued effort, the maintenance and struggles of the future are still ongoing, and in places around the world there are still too few safe spaces for people to live as their authentic selves and find their communities.  As I reflect on the history and importance of Pride, the journey towards full equality is ongoing. Discrimination and inequality persist, making it vital for us to continue advocating for the rights of all LGBTQ+ individuals. By supporting Pride and other initiatives, we contribute to a future where everyone is respected and valued for who they are. 
Whether you are a part of the pride community or not, raising awareness this month is something that can help everyone to have a more free, equal and inclusive society. Everyone deserves to be loved, to be free, and to be happy. Relationships are such a central part of our lives that being able to be open about who we love helps people to be happier.  
When it comes to acceptance, accepting yourself first is key. Knowing that no matter who you are, you are a good person. Your identity is valid. You deserve to be yourself authentically and unapologetically. No one should have to live in fear because they have an LGBTQ+ identity.  
Until we can make this a reality, Pride is still needed. Advocacy is still needed. We need to tell our stories, make our voices heard, and show the next generation that they don’t need to live in fear.
While often associated with gay pride, Pride Month is a celebration of the entire LGBTQ+ community. It includes everyone who identifies outside the cisgender and heterosexual spheres, including those who identify as lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer, non-binary, asexual, intersex, and all identities across the spectrum.  
Each identity within the LGBTQ+ community faces unique challenges. More recently, transgender and non-binary individuals have stepped up their fight for visibility and rights, while bisexual people combat erasure and asexual individuals work to gain broader recognition. Pride Month is a time to amplify all voices, ensuring no one feels overlooked or excluded.I love how bigots say there shouldn’t be a pride month and then spend the entire month proving why we need a pride month.
Happy pride month. Sending love and solidarity to everyone in the LGBTQIA+ community. We must never forget that Pride started as a protest against oppression, and it was trailblazing trans women of colour who led this protest. Pride is a time for celebration, but it is also a call to continue the fight for equity , justice and human rights for all. I am always so proud to stand in solidarity and love alongside the LGBTQIA+ community in their fight for these aims.