Thursday, 17 September 2026

Thoughts on the Macklemore-Ed Sheeran debacle




Some thoughts on the Ed Sheeran / Macklemore debacle  and what could come next in a loving world.With thanks to my dear friend Ellen Mason for her  valuable  contribution  to this  post.
The crisis began after Macklemore used his appearance at New Jersey’s MetLife Stadium to perform his protest song Hind’s Hall, inspired by the Israeli military’s notorious, and cold-blooded, murder of a six-year girl, Hind Rajab, in Gaza and display images from Gaza and declare: “Free Palestine.”  
Billionaire New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, whose company owns Gillette Stadium, subsequently refused to allow Macklemore to perform at the venue. 
According to Macklemore, Kraft also contacted other stadium owners, leaving Sheeran’s tour with an ultimatum: remove Macklemore or risk losing several major venues.  
Sheeran insists the final decision was made by the tour’s promoter and the venues—not by him.  But his attempt to distance himself from the decision did not stop the fallout. 
I feel Ed Sheeran, like many public-facing bystanders of the most heinous, cruel broad daylight crimes of our time, chose the path of perceived least resistance to: 

1. Keep a wide fan base happy and himself away from the Palestine subject, which was evidently delusional, thank God. 

 2. For his own escapism which wreaks of privileged spoilt brat behaviour. This behaviour has had the pattern of being socially approved of, and therefore safe to do, until now.  

Culturally it has been more socially acceptable than not acceptable to be silent during the slaughter, terrorisation and dehumanisation of Palestinians. And only now has this received enough shame and strong disapproval to have the potential of turning the tide (and actually stopping the continuous harm of our most extremely oppressed brothers and sisters).  
This is a very promising turning point from a social engineering point of view, and from creating a better, fairer, caring society point of view, because mass perception is the key to what environment and behaviour we get. 
Ed Sheeran is no longer facing a passing controversy. He is standing in the middle of a wildfire.  
What began with Macklemore being removed from Sheeran’s Loop Tour after declaring “Free Palestine” onstage has developed into one of the most damaging reputational crises of the British singer’s career.  
Neither Robert Kraft nor Ed Sheeran has apologized for the decision that led to Macklemore being removed from the remaining dates of Sheeran's Loop Tour. Kraft explicitly defended his actions; Sheeran distanced himself from the final call while confirming pressure from venues. .
Macklemore announced he would donate his full $1 million net earnings from the (now-truncated) tour dates to six organizations supporting Palestinians and invited Kraft to match. 
Kraft responded that, before that challenge, Sheeran had already asked him to commit $2 million to match Sheeran's own donation “to aid in the region to fight this humanitarian crisis,” with Sheeran planning to reach out to other venue owners to build bridges. 
These moves occurred amid significant public backlash and media coverage. Public statements frame them as humanitarian responses and bridge-building rather than admissions of error or personal transformation. These people aren’t buying their way out of this debacle. Censorship is unacceptable 
In a statement Sheeran has said "I am appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy. There are too many wars across the world causing immeasurable pain, none of which should be tolerated.
Damage Limitation in full effect. Too late. With the backlash and stand so many have taken, it's about saving face...and money In my view, his public statement is even worse than his initial decision to drop Macklemore. It is deeply ignorant, insincere and shows utter contempt for millions of people who care about peace, freedom and justice. 
I couldn't care less if fellow celebs think he has a "good heart". If that's true, he's not showing it. It's only right that we  forgive people when they genuinely apologise and change. But that has not happened yet. Quite the opposite.The social media uproar regarding this is massive, it's damaging for Sheeran, his publicist must be having the worst week of her life . 
Kids have just witnessed first hand a Zionist billionaire fuck with their lives, telling them what music they can and can't be allowed to watch. This is a massive PR disaster, an entire generation is now engaged with the Palestinian cause. 
Ed Sheeran had the opportunity to stand for something loudly, but instead caved at the pressure. Now his tour is falling apart and his reputation is done! But the momentum for justice for Palestinians  comtinues now to build. And I think Ed should simply cancel his tour now.
One of the best things about this whole Ed Sheeran debacle is finding out how many people hated this man for years. I have found my people.
Here's why I refuse to have any sympathy for Ed Sheeran being called out. A music artist worth half a billion dollars was tested with morality and failed miserably. Ed Sheeran’s life  has just took an abrupt turn that he probably did not see coming. But he was the one who agreed to have Macklemore open for him in the first place. He could afford to lose but chose to kowtow to the Epstein billionaire class instead.
The price of silence... His remaining supporting artists have walked away. British political commentator Owen Jones delivered one of the bluntest verdicts yet on Thursday:  “Ed Sheeran is a coward.”    Jones’s video followed an earlier attack in which he condemned Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy for expressing sympathy for Sheeran. 
 “Macklemore gets cancelled for opposing a genocide,” Jones wrote. “ And who does Lisa Nandy feel sorry for? Ed Sheeran. So unbelievably pathetic.


 Finneas, Aaron Rowe, Lukas Graham and Irish band Beoga all withdrew from the remaining dates in solidarity with Macklemore and the Palestinian people.  
Artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed,” Finneas said.  
Rowe said that as an Irishman he understood the history of “genocide, forced famine and violent occupation”, while Beoga declared that performing in venues which silence support for a free Palestine was “simply not an option”. 
Lukas Graham warned that money should never decide who is permitted to speak or which suffering the public is allowed to acknowledge.  
Their departures have left Sheeran’s claim of powerlessness looking increasingly difficult to sustain.  Irish station removes Sheeran’s music Ireland’s Classic Hits Radio has now announced that Sheeran’s music will be removed from its playlist “for the foreseeable future”.  
The independent Irish-owned broadcaster said it received feedback from listeners expressing disappointment and concern over the treatment of Macklemore. 
While acknowledging Sheeran’s explanation, the station said it wanted to stand alongside Irish artists Aaron Rowe and Beoga after they surrendered significant professional opportunities by leaving the tour.  “Our position is a simple one,” the station said. “We believe in peace, humanity and respect.”  
The station said its decision would remain under review. 
As the backlash spreads, an older attack from grime pioneer Wiley has returned with new force. 
 A video shared by Matthew Walker under the caption “Wiley clocked Ed Sheeran years ago” has attracted hundreds of thousands of views. 
The clip originates from Wiley’s earlier dispute with Sheeran, when the grime veteran branded him a “culture vulture” and accused him of benefiting from Britain’s Black and grime music infrastructure without properly reciprocating.  
Wiley referenced platforms such as SBTV and the underground radio culture which helped establish Sheeran’s credibility before his transition into global pop stardom.  
The resurfaced footage is especially striking because Wiley was not simply an outside critic. He collaborated with Sheeran during the singer’s early career, including on the 2011 track If I Could.  Sheeran rejected Wiley’s accusations at the time, insisting that he had deep love and respect for grime and for the artists who helped him.  
But amid the Macklemore controversy, Wiley’s old criticism is being viewed through a new lens: that Sheeran is comfortable drawing upon marginalised cultures when it benefits his music, but unwilling to accept the risk that comes with defending their voices. 
The problem with “neutrality” Sheeran says his concerts are intended to provide “unity, joy, escapism and love”, rather than political debate.  
He has insisted that choosing not to speak publicly does not mean he lacks personal views or does not care about Palestinian suffering.  
But critics say the removal of Macklemore was itself a political act.When an artist is excluded after speaking about Palestine, while billionaire venue owners retain the power to determine what can be said from the stage, accepting that outcome cannot credibly be described as neutrality.  
Sheeran’s defence is further complicated by his previous political interventions. He performed at the Concert for Ukraine, opposed Brexit, expressed support for Jeremy Corbyn and has publicly campaigned against racism and government cuts to music education.  
His cancelling of Macklemore makes sense only if Sheeran believes the vast scale of suffering in Gaza is of much less significance than the more limited suffering in Ukraine. Even on the most conservative estimate possible, 30 children have been killed in Gaza for every child killed in Ukraine.
With his supporting artists gone, an Irish radio station refusing to play his music, Owen Jones branding him a coward and Wiley’s old warning roaring back across social media, the attempt to contain this crisis has plainly failed.  Ed Sheeran is not putting out the fire.  It is spreading.
It was a social risk for Ed Sheeran to go with Macklemore, and thank heavens, it's backfired this  time. The disapproval of Ed Sheeran's behaviour is palpable. This is very, very good indeed in getting the genocide to stop. 
In the West, over the last 2.5 years,  we’ve seen performers, health care workers, teachers, journalists and others lose their livelihoods for standing against the Gaza Genocide. Sheeran,has misread the public mood  entirely. 
I can guarantee you, people will start feeling uncomfortable now in what should have always felt uncomfortable - ignoring the duty of standing up for those children receiving extreme brutality - our kids. 
This discomfort is tremendously healthy. If you're feeling it, great, because of what it's revealing and what the discomfort is a symptom of (which is truly worth celebrating): 
The revelation: At some point, we were duped by the entire society, the entire system that was built by oppressors, subconsciously viewed as "parents" because that's what parents do, (build and maintain the environment) to think that it was safe to throw people over there under the bus. Look away and stay in your place. Small because it's a behaviour that gets rewarded by social safety because you're doing what those "parents" are doing, rather what those equals "children" (people like me) are doing, and existential identity crises are not pretty. All of this is subconscious, and all of this is fair, not shaming. 
This is literally just humaning. This is how we behave. And there is resistance to growing in an oppressive system, because it's in the oppressor's interests to control socially obedient conformists, so it's not exactly encouraged to be righteous, confident and leading in nature. Discomfort as a symptom: This is amazing growth, the outgrowing of the "parents" - the oppressors, the cornerstone of where conscious inner parenting truly begins. 
This is the start of collectivism and structurally coherent governance from the people of the earth who have never been interested in any oppression, only love, because it's the activation of the power centre, and it's the rewiring of beliefs around what we're allowed, responsible for, and most exciting of all, how much we can play within a new paradigm where we are allowed to with shattered limits. Liberation always starts off uncomfortable, it's going to get very comfy and fun.  
Getting back to Ed Sheeran and what we now want, this is  where the light  is: 
We need many high profile celebs apologising emotionally for not speaking out. We need this humbling act. This is what's going to get the genocidal behaviour in check. We need people to swallow their pride, admit that they lacked responsibility, and then we need to be commending them for speaking out now and doing this. I would be so proud of caring celebs who haven't spoken out to do this. I would even listen to their music again.  
We need this over and over for approval to progress within politicians to completely and unanimously shut down and break the chain of oppression. And we need this across the board, it's not reserved for celebs. We need this in families, friendship groups, workplaces.  
We all need this movement. We are just waiting for the brave, the righteous, those ready for this step in their own evolution for the evolution of humankind, and for our more beautiful than ever before future together, where chains are broken, and fairness, loving kindness and care for the safety of all spreads the earth.  
Some of the worst people in the world are friendly - even "nice" – on a personal level. That doesn't take away from the awful things they do, and should not be used to excuse them.
Sheeran is world-famous; he courts the media and has hundreds of millions of pounds. That comes with responsibility and it's absolutely right he is held accountable for the decisions he made. 
A key reason why genocides happen is that not enough people take a stand. Sheeran chose to be an enabler. The man who says he doesn’t pick sides picked a side. He proved that being the nice guy is not the same as being the good guy.
Those of influence who stayed quiet on clear, large-scale atrocities (historical or current) have sometimes later acknowledged that silence carried a cost. 
Sheeran has been mates with Macklemore for over 13 years. He was well aware of Macklemore’s advocacy for Palestine and knew he would use the stage to speak up. Ed Sheeran thought he could both have his cake and eat it by making a token gesture and having Macklemore on tour.  And indeed - had he called the venue's bluff and made them cancel the dates - he could have.
This Ed Sheeran debacle is a masterclass in how to Fuck It Up. Those people who disliked the guy’s music merely tolerated him because he seemed fine. I dare say he’ll be actively avoided and ostracised from now on.It's funny how Ed Sheeran released a statement trying to defend himself, and only made  matters  worse. 
Ed Sheeran is now going to have Free Palestine shouted at him wherever he goes for the rest of his life.  He wanted to ignore Genocide, now he will never be able to. I call that Karma.
Public admissions of earlier inaction can, in some cases, model responsibility and shift norms. Extending that expectation beyond celebrities into families, workplaces, and friendship groups is a coherent extension of the same idea: social pressure as a tool against indifference.
The Ed Sheeran debacle is honestly showing that many fans are no longer going to to put up with artists not being real and genuine and not taking a stand for the right thing where it's needed. 
The way people have united behind Macklemore is proof that no amount of money, propaganda, persuasion or threats can stop the Free Palestine movement. 
Ed Sheeran’s current debacle was totally avoidable. He had the leverage but failed to realise it. He ought to have insisted Macklemore performed but he folded. Now, things have fallen apart. Stay on the fence all you like but don’t directly or indirectly participate in the muzzling of someone lending their voice to a cause.  
And realise that your silence on global burning issues affecting fans of your music can be loud. Sometimes, it can be interpreted as assent. Ed Sheeran is probably in shock right now. He knew that he was touring with Palestine supporters but he didn’t expect them to really believe in it. He doesn’t understand what that’s like. He’s never supported anything that wasn’t approved by the bosses for commercial purposes. 
Ed Sheeran politicised himself, taking a financial and reputational hit for capitulating  Robert Kraft,  an  individual who in 2019,  who built a sports complex in Israel and is a personal friend of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and pledged $20 million for a foundation to fight the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS).
The fact that Ed also played at the billionaires wedding a few years ago is also being kept  quite. Ed has appeased a supporter of genocide and in doing so, sacrificed his long  time friend for money,  is   masterclass in undermining his own career. And Kraft won't care  one  bit. 
Ed Sheeran will be fine in the end  he's worth  millions  he'll still have  a  life of  comfort, I truly hope the same can be said for the people of Gaza.
If there’s just one important thing to learn from the Ed Sheeran tour debacle, it’s that declaring yourself ‘apolitical’ is still in itself a political stance. Often a very privileged and ignorant one at that. Politics is everything, and everything is politics, there’s no escaping it, we are all involved, no matter what side you’re on or how much you do, or do not, want to talk about it. 
As the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu observed in relation to the apartheid regime of South Africa: "If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.” Neutrality is complicity. Always will be. 
Accountability and moral courage matter. People in positions of influence who stayed quiet on clear, large-scale atrocities (historical or current) have sometimes later acknowledged that silence carried a cost. Public admissions of earlier inaction can, in some cases, model responsibility and shift norms. Extending that expectation beyond celebrities into families, workplaces, and friendship groups is a coherent extension of the same idea: social pressure as a tool against indifference.
During a ongoing holocaust that’s sprouting to the West Bank and beyond all of us that have a voice must use it to stop this holocaust and stand for Justice for the oppressed. 
The world united once to rid the world of Apartheid in South Africa. We must do the same to stop the genocide in Palestine. This is what certain powers fear, people united for humanity and for life. Genocide is genocide.Ethnic cleansing is ethnic cleansing. Apartheid is apartheid. Occupation is occupation. Israel is committing all these atrocities against Palestinians…We cannot look away. We must all speak out and stand against it. 
Palestine, Congo, Sudan, Tigray, West Papua, Haiti, Yemen, Hawaii, all deserve to find freedom. We may not be able to give that to them ourselves but we can and must demand change. The least we can do is listen to them and uplift their voices so they aren't silenced.
Let us not despair. Let us be the ones who heal. Let us not be divided, Let us come together united. United in hope for all of humanity. Solidarity to  all who continue  to speak out  for  justice in  the  name of  love and humanity.

Wednesday, 16 September 2026

Sabra and Shatila: Massacre. We must never forget.

 


Sabra and Shatila Massacre Mural by Dia al‑Azzawi, 1982–83  Al-Azzawi was moved by French writer, playwright, and political activist Jean Genet’s Four Hours in Shatila, an eyewitness account of the massacre which he wrote after visiting the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps.
The work is made of ink and wax crayon on paper mounted on canvas where the cubist influenced imagery is visceral, revealing the horror of the massacre of Palestinian and Lebanese civilians by Christian militias with Israeli complicity. It offers no hero or triumph, its anti-war message lies in it demand that we stand witness to the endless cycle of violence.

A period  of  time I try not  to  forget is the bloody days from September 16 through  to 18, 1982, when up to 3,500 Palestinian defenceless refugees mostly women, children and the elderly in Shatila camp and Sabra neighborhood in Beirut, Lebanon were slaughtered at the hands of Phalangist militiamen, encircled, trained and supported by Israeli occupation forces who had besieged West Beirut for 88  days. 
The Israel Defence Forces (IDF)  had  invaded Lebanon in June 1982 with the goal of pushing out the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). After newly-elected President Bashir Gemayel was assassinated on September 14th, the IDF invaded West Beirut, which included the Sabra neighborhood and the Shatila refugee camp, which predominately housed Muslim refugees. The IDF ordered their allies in Lebanon, the Kataeb Party (also called the Phalange), a right-wing Maronite Christian party, to clear the area of PLO militants to facilitate the IDF advance.days before launching a full-scale occupation-day period, members of the Lebanese Christian militias.
Almost immediately after the killing began, Israeli soldiers surrounding Sabra and Shatila became aware that civilians were being murdered but did nothing to stop it. Instead, the Israeli military fired flares into the night sky to illuminate the darkness for the Phalangists, allowed more Phalangist fighters to enter the area on the second day.
The Phalangists finally left Sabra and Shatila on the morning of September 18, taking many of the surviving men with them for interrogation at a soccer stadium. The interrogations were carried out with Israeli intelligence agents, who handed many of the captives back to the Phalange. Some of the men returned to the Phalange were later found executed.
Exactly how many were actually killed  remains unknown as the real number is hard to determine because bodies were buried quickly in mass graves or never found and many men were marched out of the camp and “disappeared.” 
Their only "crime" was that they were Palestinians or, in the case of many poor Lebanese Shiite refugees from South Lebanon, thought to be Palestinians. Before the massacres, the two camps on the southwestern fringes of Beirut were home for some thirty thousand refugees from northern Palestine. Most had lived there since 1948 when the camps were established by the UNRWA on land leased from two large Beiruti families, the Shatilas and the Sabras.
Israel actually supplied the bulldozers to bury the dead and later  tanks entered the camps and ran over the whole area, destroying houses and clearing any signs of crime. 
Shortly before the massacres, the Palestinian Liberation Organisation was evacuated from Lebanon as a result of an agreement reached after the Israeli invasion of the country. That meant the residents of Sabra and Shatila no longer had protection, despite promises made to them by Philip Habib, an envoy for then US President Ronald Reagan, that their security would be guaranteed. 
The massacre was presented as retaliation for the assassination of newly elected Lebanese president Bachir Germavel, the leader of the Lebanese Kataeb Party. It was wrongly assumed that Palestinians militants had carried out the assassination. The incident would cause outrage and condemnation across the world.
On the 18th of September, after about forty hours of killing, the first images of the massacre showing civilian victims appeared on TV. They provoked worldwide indignation and compassion. Foreign journalists and diplomats entered the camps in the aftermath of the massacre after the IDF had withdrawn from the entrances. Their reports and photographs all expressed despair and brutality. 
Loren Jenkins, from the Washington Post, wrote on September the 23th: “The scene at the Shatila camp when foreign observers entered Saturday morning was like a nightmare. Women wailed over the deaths of loved ones, bodies began to swell under the hot sun, and the streets were littered with thousand of spent cartridges. Houses had been dynamited and bulldozed into rubble, many with the inhabitants still inside. Groups of bodies lay before bullet-pocked walls where they appeared to have been executed. Others were strewn in alleys and streets, apparently shot as they tried to escape”. 
Israel for a while denied it had conspired in the massacre, yet as a result of international condemnation it launched an inquiry in 1983, known as the Kahan Commission  http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/kahan.html  set up in 1983 in response to widespread international pressure, concluded that that Israeli leaders were “indirectly responsible” for the killings and that Ariel Sharon, then the defense minister and later prime minister, bore “personal responsibility” for failing to prevent the massacre . 
Sadly the Sabra and Shatila crimes were not the first crimes against the Palestinian people and would not be the last. Over three decades later, the massacre at the Sabra and Shatila camps is remembered as one of the most notorious chapters in modern Middle Eastern history. 
Today, not a single person (Israeli or Lebanese) has been charged with  involvement in the crime. The amnesty law that came into affect after Lebanon’s Civil Wars ended in 1991 let many of those involved in the massacre off the hook. 
Sharon  was received with great affection by former US President George Bush, a  man  also drenched in the blood of innocents. Sharon died in January 2014 without any trial or accountability.
Sabra and Shatila is quite simply one of the greatest human tragedies that we should never simply forget. 
The dehumanisation of Palestinians by Israel continues and the Israeli military itself continues to commit war crimes with impunity, as evidenced by Israel's repeated attacks on the tiny besieged Gaza Strip over the past decade, which have killed thousands of innocent Palestinians with disproportionate and indiscriminate force. 
Today there are more than 400,000 Palestinian refugees living in Lebanon, most barred from owning property and earing decent wages. They make up part of the nearly 5 million Palestinians refugees living in the West Bank, Gaza and throughout the Middle East, descendants of the 750,000 displaced after the establishment of the Israeli State.
Israel's years of dispossession and half-century of military rule still ongoing and is supported by unconditional American military aid and diplomatic backing. International bodies like the UN Security Council have repeatedly made note of Israel's human rights violations. Injustices continue to this day  through land confiscations, home demolitions, mass imprisonment, collective displacement, racist discrimination, assassination and killing. 
The conscience of the world was terribly wounded on this day and we cannot, should not and will not ever forget or forgive.With sorrow and with struggle, we  must remember Sabra and Shatila and pledge to continue to work for justice.
The international community is obliged to remedy its moral responsibility to the victims of the  massacre by working to end Israel's occupation and other abuses of Palestinian rights.For the Palestinians, the tragedy of Sabra and Shatila remains a powerful reminder  of their endless cycle of displacement. 
On the 44th anniversary of the Sabra and Shatila massacre, we remember that this massacre was not an anomaly; it was a continuation of Israel’s ethnic cleansing, from the Nakba to Gaza today. 
While the deep wounds inflicted by the massacre remain fresh in the memories of Palestinians, Israel's attacks on Gaza, which began on Oct. 7, 2023, continue unabated. The situation in the West Bank and Gaza and for the Palestinians living in refugee camps in countries neighboring Israel could not be more dark and grim. The constant arrests, house demolitions and killing of unarmed Palestinians in the West Bank and the regular bombing of blockaded Gaza are rarely reported in the mainstream media anymore. 
The six million refugees living outside historic Palestine are all but forgotten. Many of us have allowed them to fade in our consciousness. Yet every Palestinian killed—whether by Israeli bombardment of Gaza or the 2,022 killed, including 526 children, in Operation Protective Edge in 2014; the 1,400 deaths, including 300 children, in Operation Cast Lead in 2008-9; or in the Great March of Return cannot be forgotten.
These deaths wrench out the hearts of their family and those who love them, leaving large gaping wounds which have not healed.Their blood cries out for justice, and we will not be silent. No amount of normalization will erase the collective memories of peoples, so long as we keep on remembering.
There is no healing as the violence against the Palestinians is ongoing. There is only ongoing traumatic onslaughts and wounding of their bodies and souls.
On this important commemoration of those who were brutally murdered in Shatila refugee camp, we take inspiration from the strength of the victims and survivors. We  must  commit to continue our efforts towards making  a better future where all Palestinians can realise their full rights to health and dignity,  and demand accountability, sanctions on Israel, and an end to U.S. complicity in these atrocities. 
Events  like  these underscore the ongoing suffering and struggles faced by the Palestinian people. It's essential to strive for peace, justice, and a resolution to the conflicts that have plagued this region for decades and to a free Palestine. 
As Israel’s genocide against Palestinians in Gaza completes its third year and its genocidal war in Lebanon continues, we must escalate pressure to end state, corporate and institutional complicity that has enabled Israel’s atrocities to continue for decades.   
It is high time to suspend Israel’s membership in the UN, at the very least, and impose lawful broad sanctions against its regime of settler-colonialism, apartheid, occupation and genocide.
The following  is a powerful, moving poem from the pen of the late great Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish.

Sabra and Shatila  by Mahmoud Darwish  

Sabra — a sleeping girl
The men left
War slept for two short nights,
Beirut obeyed and became the capital…
A long night
Observing the dreams in Sabra,
Sabra is sleeping.
Sabra — the remains of a dead body
She bid farewell to her horsemen and time
And surrendered to sleep out of tiredness.. and the Arabs who threw her behind them.
Sabra — and what the soldiers Departing from Galilee forgot
She doesn’t buy and sell anything but her silence
To buy flowers to put on her braided hair.
Sabra — sings her lost half, between the sea and the last war:
Why do you go?
And leave your wives in the middle of a hard night?
Why do you go?
And hang your night
Over the camp and the national anthem?
Sabra — covering her naked breasts with a farewell song
Counts her palms and gets it wrong
While she can’t find the arm:
How many times will you travel?
And for how long?
And for what dream?
If you return one day
for which exile shall you return,
which exile brought you back?
Sabra — tearing open her chest:
How many times
does the flower bloom?
How many times
will the revolution travel?
Sabra — afraid of the night. Puts it on her knees
covers it with her eyes’ mascara. Cries to distract it:
They left without saying
anything about their return
Withered and tended
from the rose’s flame!
Returned without returning
to the beginning of their journey
Age is like children
running away from a kiss.
No, I do not have an exile
To say: I have a home
God, oh time ..!
Sabra — sleeps. And the fascist’s knife wakes up
Sabra calls who she calls
All of this night is for me, and night is salt
the fascist cuts her breasts — the night reduced — 
he then dances around his knife and licks it. Singing an ode to a victory of the cedars,
And erases
Quietly .. Her flesh from her bones
and spreads her organs over the table
and the fascist continues dancing and laughs for the tilted eyes
and goes crazy for joy, Sabra is no longer a body:
He rides her as his instincts suggest, and his will manifests.
And steals a ring from her flesh and blood and goes back to his mirror
And be — Sea
And be — Land
And be — Clouds
And be — Blood
And be — Night
And be — Killing
And be — Saturday
and she be — Sabra.
Sabra — the intersection of two streets on a body
Sabra, the descent of a Spirit down a Stone
And Sabra — is no one
Sabra — is the identity of our time, forever.

(translation by Saad El Kurdi)

And  here  is the  film 'Children of Shatila'   from 1998 where Palestinian filmmaker Masri interviews Palestinian children Farah and Issa, two streetwise kids living in Beirut's camps, they use their imaginations and creativity to come to terms with the realities of growing up in a refugee camp that survived the most horrific massacre, siege, and starvation at the hands of the Phalangists, and assisted  Israel's and Yanks.




The Portrait above by Mark Vallen was created in the immediate aftermath of the Sabra and Shatila massacre.
The masked Palestinian is deliberately unarmed. Vallen explained that the keffiyeh was used as a symbol of Palestinian identity and solidarity; the work, he stressed, was “never intended as a call to arms.”  
The poster was associated with Shock Battalion, Vallen's Los Angeles political-art collective, which produced anti-war and internationalist silkscreen prints during the 1980s.  
More than forty years later, those eyes remain incredibly arresting.  Not an image of surrender, but of a people seen, remembered, and refusing to disappear.

In Memoriam of the Sabra and Shatila massacre 44th anniversary  "Sabra and Shatila" Poster 1982 by Palestinian (Gaza) artist Abdel Rahman  Al Muzain. 

Commissioned by the P.L.O  



Sunday, 13 September 2026

Remembering Stephen Lawrence (13 September 1974 – 22 April 1993)


Today, I remember Stephen Adrian Lawrence on what would have been his 52nd birthday.The story of Stephen Lawrence is a deeply tragic one and continues to resonate deeply. sadly, one of far too many.
Stephen was born and grew up in Greenwich  south-east London, where he lived with his parents Neville and Doreen, his brother Stuart and sister Georgina. Like most young people, he juggled an active social life, school work, family commitments, and part-time employment. But he also had ambitions to use his talent for maths, art, and design to become an architect, and wanted to have a positive impact on his community.
Tragically, his dream of becoming an architect was never realised. On 22 April 1993, at the age of just 18, Stephen was murdered in an unprovoked racist attack. He didn’t know his killers and his killers didn’t know him.
The facts of the case were clear: Stephen was waiting for a bus with a friend when he was attacked, stabbed repeatedly and left to die on the pavement. The killing of Stephen Lawrence by a group of young men simply because he was Black was a horrific crime, but the failure to correctly pursue the killers because of the Metropolitan Police’s own racism was an appalling crime in its own right.
Undercover officers spied on his family’s campaign for justice. Stephen’s parents and his friend, Duwayne Brooks, who was with him on the night he died, were all reported on by undercover police and are all classed as core participants in the public inquiry.
Incompetence, alleged corruption and racism in the police meant that it took nearly 20 years to convict two of his killers,Gary Dobson and David Norris, while the remaining three Neil Acourt, Jamie Acourt and Luke Knight have never been brought to justice  in  connection  with Stephen Lawrence's  murder while Matthew White, who was arrested twice over the killing who was never prosecuted, died aged 50 before he was named as a suspect after a BBC investigation in  2023.
Dobson and Norris were  juveniles at the time of the crime and were sentenced to detention at Her Majesty's pleasure, equivalent to a life sentence for an adult, with minimum terms of 15 years 2 months and 14 years 3 months respectively for what the judge described as a "terrible and evil crime".
It   was not  until March 2025 that Norris eventually admitted his involvement in the crime.
Their sentences should be long, despite the fact that they were juvenille at the time, they have shown no remorse, consistently lied and flaunted and paraded their arrogance. Shown themselves as the cowardly racists they are.
Sadly  too  the ugly reality of racist hatred still lingers. It needs to be crushed and condemned at all times. Only then can we really move on.A public inquiry into the handling of Stephen’s case was held in 1998, leading to the publication of the Macpherson Report, a major breakthrough in recognising institutional racism and taking steps to tackle it.
The findings of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry led to changes in the British Race Relations Act and an opening up of discussion and attitudes around race and colour. Of course, what we know from discussions in 2020 and 2021 is that the inequalities that are created by racism have not been removed since the recommendations were given in the 1999 report.
Ever since, a major struggle has taken place to defend the findings of the Macpherson report and a host of other reports which have found overwhelming evidence of institutional racism and made recommendations to record and combat it.
The Undercover Policing Inquiry was set up in 2015 to look at the activities of two shadowy police units after condemnation of undercover tactics.
A public outcry was sparked when it was revealed that women had been tricked into sexual relationships with undercover officers and that police spies had used the identities of dead children without their families’ permission.
Family justice campaigns were spied upon, and there are claims that some officers were arrested or prosecuted for crimes under fake identities, leading to alleged miscarriages of justice for their co-defendants.
The Government's CRED report was the latest attempt by those wishing to deny institutional racism, and therefore deepen it. It is vital to the legacy of those who have fought racism for decades that we defeat it.
The report has since been overwhelmingly rejected, including by a UN panel who concluded that it "repackages racist tropes and stereotypes into fact, twisting data and misapplying statistics and studies into conclusory findings and ad hominem attacks on people of African descent. " 
Stephen Lawrence's racist murder and the subsequent indifference of the Met Police left a wake of shock and grief, but also a strong appetite for profound change - something activists had worked towards for decades. Ultimately leading to the passing of the equality act and the establishment of the EHRC.
Stephen was a young man with a future ahead of him, a life filled with hopes, dreams and possibilities that should never have been taken from him. Stephen was murdered because of racism. The pain of that loss belongs first and foremost to his family and those who knew and loved him, but the injustice of what happened has left an enduring mark on our society.
The circumstances surrounding his death are a reminder of the institutional racism which still pervades British society that needs to be crushed and condemned at all times. Only then can we really move on.
Stephen's  mother Doreen Lawrence turned unbearable loss into a legacy of justice, reshaping British policing for generations to come. Her courage reminds us that one voice, refusing to be silenced, can change a nation. 
Never forget Stephen. Never forget how hard his family fought for justice. And never forget that he was murdered by fascists,  and  the police tried to cover it up - and then spied on his family. 
May Stephen Lawrence continue to rest in peace.  
Here's a poem from the late brilliant Dub poet Benjamin Zephaniah, still pertinent, still raising questions.  

What Stephen Lawrence Has Taught Us  = .Benjamin Zephaniah

We know who the killers are,
We have watched them strut before us
As proud as sick Mussolinis',
We have watched them strut before us
Compassionate and arrogant,
They paraded before us,
Like angels of death
Protected by the law.

It is now an open secret
Black people do not have
Chips on their shoulders,
They just have injustice on their backs
And justice on their minds,
And now we know that the road to liberty
Is as long as the road from slavery.

The death of Stephen Lawrence
Has taught us how to love each other
And never to take the tedious task
Of waiting for a bus for granted.
Watching his parents watching the cover-up
Begs the question
What are the trading standards here?
Why are we paying for a police force
That will not work for us?

The death of Stephen Lawrence
Has taught us
That we cannot let the illusion of freedom
Endow us with a false sense of security as we walk the streets,
The whole world can now watch
The academics and the super cops
Struggling to define institutionalised racism
As we continue to die in custody
As we continue emtying our pockets on the pavements,
And we continue to ask ourselves
Why is it so official
That black people are so often killed
Without killers?

We are not talking about war or revenge
We are not talking about hypothetics or possibilities,
We are talking about where we are now
We are talking about how we live now
In dis state
Under dis flag, ( God Save the Queen),
And God save all those black children who want to grow up
And God save all the brothers and sisters
Who like raving,
Because the death of Stephen Lawrence
Has taught us that racism is easy when
You have friends in high places
And friends in high places
Have no use whatsoever
When they are not your friends.

Dear Mr Condon,
Pop out of Teletubby land,
And visit reality,
Come to an honest place
And get some advice from your neighbours,
Be enlightened by our community,
Neglect your well-paid ignorance
Because
We know who the killers are.

Reprinted from Too Black , Too Strong
Bloodaxe 2001.


'Justice for Stephen is about all of us, every one of us, in society having justice ,' - Baroness Doreen Lawrence


Brave The Waves


Brave The  Waves

Seasons change, some songs dissapear
Shadows dance among the ashes,
Holding heartbeats that we continue to  feel
Voices we remember that touch us eternally,
As our future is submerged with despair
Avenues of sadness and desperation appear,   
Black shirted balaclava wearing racist thugs 
Spread division bathed and laced with fear,
While govenments make protest terrorism 
And we walk into the obscenity of fascism,
Power is used to proscribe freedoms path
To prop up foreign government lies,
Make nations complicit, without  consent
Duplicitous in nature, totally out of touch,
Criticise all, make themselves beyond reproach
Abominable energies cancelling tranquility,
Their bonds of light and trust nowhere to be seen 
They don't seem to listen, making people scream,
Beyond their dark reflections of ugliness 
I try to ignore the continuing insidiousness,
Being woke in thought without callousness 
Do not abandon myself to hopelessness,
Will not be controlled by powers untender
Inner defences fight back, refuse to surrender,
Against forces of disarray tearing each other apart.
In these moments of sadness and madness
Pain numbing deep inside, instead of gladness,
In times overshadowed by hatred and anger
Enable my voice to speak in the name of love, 
Let poems keep on delivering illumination  
Colours of orange and bronze, signal autums arrival,
Allows things of goodness, continue to inspire
Beyond prisms of blackness, sparkling in abundance,
Cycles of smiles and laughter, scatters all the hate 
Permit hope to rise, before it's too bloody late,
Beyond barbarity, use poetry to resist
Reaffirm binding warmth and humanity,
Celebrate diversity beyond polorization
Against superfluous share goodness, 
As WH Auden wrote on the eve of World War II:
 “All I have is a voice 
To undo the folded lie, 
The romantic lie in the brain
Of the sensual man-in-the-street
And the lie of Authority 
Whose buildings grope the sky: 
There is no such thing as the State 
And no one exists alone; 
Hunger allows no choice 
To the citizen or the police; 
We must love one another or die.” 

Monday, 7 September 2026

Olympia, 1934- the Blackshirts first mass gathering.2026 History Repeating.

 

The British Union of Fascists (BUF) was founded by Oswald Mosley in 1932. Within a few years, the party had gained thousands of members, and by 1934 Mosley felt confident enough to stage several large-scale public speeches. In April of that year, the BUF hosted a largely successful rally in the (Royal) Albert Hall. The next event in the series took place on 7 June at Olympia, a Victorian events venue that could hold up to 15,000 people.  


The event attracted many people who were not members of the BUF but were interested to hear Mosley’s ideas, or curious about this new political movement. It was planned along the lines of Hitler’s Nuremberg rallies and Mosley set out to make it the largest, most spectacular public gathering in the history of British politics. 
Fifteen thousand gathered to hear Mosley speak including young men and women in evening dress, middle-class family parties with small children, and a large gathering of workers in their working clothes and, by some accounts, about 150 Members of Parliament. 
The proceedings were carefully stage-managed on an impressively theatrical level but instead of swastikas there was a profusion of Blackshirt banners bearing the ‘bolt of lightning’ symbol and Union Jacks fluttered everywhere. 
But , when Mosley entered with huge pomp and fanfare and began to speak, he was booed and heckled. 
A few incredibly brave antifascists had got in who had obtained tickets in an interesting way. The Daily Mail ran a competition and you could win £1 and a ticket to a Mosley rally if your letter was published in the Daily Mail but for the purposes of this competition your letter had to begin with the words: “why I like the Blackshirts”. Anti-fascists wrote spoof letters, got tickets and forged more.  
When Mosley walked up to the platform through a guard of honour with a spotlight on him he had no idea demonstrators were inside as well as outside, but he had 1,000 uniformed, jackbooted, stewards, just in case.  #Just three minutes into his speech a protester stood up and shouted “Down with Mussolini, down with Hitler, down with Mosley, fascism means hunger and war” and sat down again. Every three minutes a protester stood up with a similar heckle, until Mosley gave a sign. 
The next time it happened the heckler was yanked out of their seat by 15 fascists who beat the living daylights out of him in front of everyone Mosley wanted to impress. It was a chaotic and violent evening – Hundreds of police did nothing to stop the violence.  80 protesters needed hospital treatment. And amid the violence, Mosley made his most anti-Semitic speech to date. 
It would be left to Antifascists to mobilise and build to protect themselves, and make the blackshirts pay. One thing was certain- the fascists had revealed themselves. They were a violent, existential threat to the core.
The fascists were beaten back in the 1930s.Mosely's “respectable” support fell away and he never recovered. By May 1940 the entire Blackshirt movement had been proscribed by law and its leaders interned in prison. 
I’ve got this sudden feeling of Déjà vu! Reform are revisiting … history repeats. A video from the party’s gathering in Birmingham revealed that those attending were more like a mob than delegates and showed  Farageists pulling a  woman protester’s hair and grabbing her head, with a man then hitting her with a metal walking stick while their  Fuhrer Nigel Farage laughed from the podium. 
This visual evidence  should be  used in the future to show students how and when Fascism has definitively broken out again in the open in British politics. Violence and hatred targeting a female protestor has  exposed Reform to be a dangerously corrupt party. Nigel Farage actually encouraged this from the stage, he’s completely unfit for public office.Don't let history repeat itself.
All  from  from a party that claims to want to protect Women and Children, from a party that wants to remove everybody's protections by leaving the ECHR, and wants to organise in their party colours a separate security force in Essex. If you disagree with them in any way, they want to shut you down.This is fascist Reform.
Two shocking images this weekend:
 1. balaclava clad far right thugs in Dover promoted by fascist Tommy Robinson and his side kick Danny Tommo are a real threat stoking fear and hatred in our communities.These people acting with complete impunity are acting on the rhetoric of Farage and co and the scapegoating of refugees and migrants by mainstream politicians and the media. 
There was nothing spontaneous about Dover. Kent Police said there was. What actually happened: Tommy Robinson's right-hand man spent weeks recruiting men across the country, staged hundreds of them overnight in a Kent village 18 miles from the port, and moved them in at 5.30am in vans. 
Danny Tommo - hid none of it. In August he held a national recruitment day in a Warwickshire field and told the men there they would be part of the biggest pushback since the Second World War. Three days before Dover he posted a video saying "something is about to go down and men from all round the country will be involved in it." He named an earlier operation after the D-Day landings. The French banned the rally and banned him from the country. 
You didn't need intelligence sources. You needed an internet connection.The masked Dover protest highlights how Britain’s far right is growing through an underground network, using tactics incredibly reminiscent of the Nazis, if reform gain  a foothold , these thugs will be patrolling the streets, checking your ID, your sexuality, your gender, your ethnic background all to decide if you’re entitled to be here or not.   
2. Zombie Fascists assaulting young women at Reform Conference for exercising the right of the Freedom of Speech that Reform claim to uphold.
This is the response to an assault by a group of people on a woman who merely heckled.  Reform UK Treasury spokesperson Robert Jenrick tells a protester who appeared to have been hit by members at the party's conference to "get a life".and  simply says “oh, boo hoo”.
Oswald Mosley said much the same when his Blackshirt thugs beat the shit out of hecklers at the British Union of Fascists Olympia rally in 1934.The parallels are becoming disturbingly close.
It's a  fact that  fascism is strategic, planned and coordinated  and in the UK is funded  and controlled by foreign billionaires. Reform UK are their public face. And the police appear to be complicit. Both events  caught on Live National TV. We are closer to actual Fascism in England than people realise, it's time to wake up. We are on a precipice and we need to act. Let’s hope this is Farage’s Olympia moment.


You can't reform fascism. it  needs to be crushed out of existence and Farage forced out of politics. We must continue to  to stand not just against fascism but every manifestation of racism and authoritarianism that feeds it, and work to  strengthen an anti-racist and anti-fascist majority in our society.It's  never  been  more  important.  
Reform  consists of the most dangerous people in UK politics. A party that will destroy the UK and will leave our great nation in ruins. They want to normalise hatred and distrust, racism and homophobia, rage and disorder, lies and rampant disinformation campaigns, discrimination and sexism, ignorance and reactionary knee-jerking fascism. 
Like Trump, Reform loves under-educated people.Fascism is financed by the rich, its base the lumpenproletariat. Its first victims are its political opponents on the left, then civil society organisations, next minority groups and then everyone who stayed silent and did nothing.Say no to fascism. Say no to Reform. No Pasaran! They shall not pass!


 Sigh, Reform supporters using Chumbawamba is nearly as bad as the BNP using If You Tolerate This. 

Chumbawamba & Credit To The Nation - Enough Is Enough


Thursday, 3 September 2026

Anniversary of the landmark treaty, European Convention on Human Rights


Today marks the anniversary of the landmark treaty the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) – more formally, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – coming into effect, a milestone that highlights the enduring importance of safeguarding human rights across Europe, even as ongoing challenges keep putting its principles to the test.  Members of the European Council ratified the European Convention on Human Rights on 4 November 1950, but it only came into effect on 3 September 1953, 
The Convention’s principal authors were a Frenchman, a Belgian and a Scot: Pierre-Henri Teitgen, Fernand Dehousse and David Maxwell Fyfe (later Lord Chancellor Kilmuir).
The ECHR was a remarkable achievement. Like its better known cousin, the EU, it has become a foundation stone of post-war peace and stability in Europe. We should heap praise on the ECHR, not least for the way it protects those most at risk in our society.
The ECHR is an international human rights treaty between the 47 states that are members of the Council of Europe (CoE) - not to be confused with the European Union. It is the role of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasburg to make sure that the Convention is respected.
The court is responsible for monitoring respect for the human rights of 800 million Europeans within the 47 Council of Europe member states that have ratified the convention. At present, 47 judges – who are elected for a non-renewable term every nine years by the parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe – sit at the court. They are totally independent and can not engage in any activity that would hinder their impartiality. Since the court was established, most cases have been lodged by individuals.
The CoE was founded after World War II to protect human rights and the rule of law, and to promote democracy. The ECHR guarantees specific rights and is a framework people can invoke, should their rights and freedoms be compromised. The UK’s history with the Council of Europe is longer than its relationship with the European Union, as it joined the CoE 24 years before it joined the EU. 
The UK’s own Human Rights Act reflects the rights included in the ECHR, including rights to freedom from torture, to a fair trial and to respect for family and private life, to name a few.  Legislation moving through parliament 
Before the incorporation of the Convention, individuals in the United Kingdom could only complain of unlawful interference with their Convention rights by lodging a petition with the European Commission of Human Rights in Strasbourg. That all changed on 2 October 2000 when the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force, allowing UK citizens to sue public bodies for breaches of their Convention rights in domestic courts. Ever since, it has protected the basic human rights of every single person in the UK.
Governments who  have  signed up to the ECHR have made a legal commitment to abide by certain standards of behaviour and to protect the basic rights and freedoms of people. It is a treaty to protect the rule of law and promote democracy in European countries. 
The idea for the creation of the ECHR was proposed in the early 1940s while the Second World War was still raging across Europe. It was developed to ensure that governments would never again be allowed to dehumanise and abuse people’s rights with impunity, and to help fulfil the promise of ‘never again’. 
In May 1948 after the war had ended, the ‘Congress of Europe’ was held in The Hague, a gathering of over 750 delegates which included leaders from civil society groups, academia, business and religious groups, trade unions, and leading politicians from across Europe such as Winston Churchill, François Mitterand and Konrad Adenauer.  In his speech to the Congress, Churchill stated: 

  “In the centre of our movement stands the idea of a Charter of Human Rights, guarded by freedom and sustained by law.”  

 Winston Churchill, (The Hague, 7th May 1948)

The European Convention on Human Rights  guarantees a range of political rights and freedoms of the individual against interference by the State and protects  the basic human rights of every single person in the UK, and the rights we are all familiar with come from it.
In the 75 years of its existence, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) has proven remarkable resilience as a safeguard for democracy, human rights and the rule of law. The judicial conversation enriched (and sometimes prompted) by the ECHR is not only a European exchange, a dialogue and debate among judges and politicians, citizens and civil servants, journalists and diplomats in the Council of Europe’s 46 member states. 
The jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court resonates globally – it influences the International Court of Justice, it inspires (and interacts with) its Inter-American and African counterparts, and it informs debates on the major environmental, political, and technological challenges of our times, including climate change, migration, and artificial intelligence. At.
It should be no surprise, that those who seek to undermine support for the ECHR have started not by criticising the Convention but rather by attacking the legal profession in general and human rights lawyers in particular. Just as with Brexit, they recognise that the pathway to leaving the ECHR lies through polarising and dividing public opinion.
Human rights protections  must not weakened or abandoned. They should be strengthened. We must  not be divided. Either everyone has human rights, or no one does. We all want to live in a society where everyone is treated with dignity and respect The ECHR is a step towards that vision. 
On its  birthday, let’s celebrate the ECHR and fight to keep the UK in it, and to  pledge never to let this or any other government to  take our fundamental  human rights and freedoms away from us.
From protecting our privacy and workers' rights, to helping victims secure justice and advancing LGBTQ+ rights, the Convention has helped hold those in power to account and ensure our rights are respected.  
Many of us may never need to rely on these protections directly. But when people do, the ECHR is there to defend their right to speak out, to protest, to love who they choose and to live in peace.
The ECHR and the Human Rights Act (HRA) are the strongest weapons that victims of crime have, putting a duty on the police to keep us safe and protect our rights to life, freedom from torture, and inhumane or degrading treatment. It brought justice to the 97 that died in the Hillsborough disaster. Article 2 of the Convention (right to life) won the families a new inquest that investigated the full circumstances of each death and whether the actions of the police had played a part. The inquest found that the 97 were unlawfully killed and the fans were not to blame for what happened.  
The ECHR lets us access healthcare with dignity If you are in a care home or hospital, it is the ECHR that helps you retain your independence and autonomy. You will have your privacy respected, you can have family visit you, and if you have capacity, you will be able to make decisions relating to your care.  
When local councils attempted to split an elderly married couple and place them in different care homes, it was Article 8 (right to a family life) that stopped this and kept them together.  
It was the ECHR and the introduction of the HRA that put a duty on local authorities to keep us safe from ill-treatment. This means authorities must step in to prevent children being left with abusive parents and similarly keeps children with their parents in situations where they might otherwise be divided.  
Article 8 (right to family life) ensured that a mother and child were kept together after leaving an abusive partner and were helped to find stable housing. 
Our Armed Forces would be significantly less safe without the ECHR, both on and off the battlefield. The families of soldiers who died in the unsafe Snatch Land Rovers (known as ‘mobile coffins’ in Iraq) used the ECHR to win their case against the Ministry of Defence. Article 2 (right to life) put a duty on the MoD to provide suitable equipment to keep soldiers safe.  
The ECHR protects LGBTQ+ rights The ECHR protects against discrimination and has secured many important advancements in the rights of LGBTQ+ people in the UK. It was the ECHR that overturned the ban on homosexual acts in Northern Ireland, ended the prohibition on gay people serving in the military, and helped equalise the age of consent.  
The beauty of the ECHR is that it’s what’s known as a ‘living instrument,’ meaning these laws aren’t stuck in the 1950s but have developed over time to meet 21st century challenges.  
But recent changes to how the ECHR is applied risks opening the door to a slow erosion of all our rights. 
The new Prime Minister has an opportunity to choose a different path: one that protects our hard-won rights and freedoms now and in the future.  

Tuesday, 1 September 2026

Wendell Erdman Berry, poet and farmer RIP. (5/08 /34 - 31/08/26) - Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front / The Peace of Wild Things

 


Very  sad  to  hear  that  we have lost one of the 20th century's most important voices for ecological sanity, Wendell Berry,  revered poet,  essayist , farmer , enviromental  activist , visionaty, prophet  and  devoted guardian of  the  living  world . Another fine human taking leave of this place.  RIP. 
Berry's death, on Aug. 31, was confirmed by his publisher, Counterpoint Press. "In a world that feels under siege, Wendell's writing asks us to slow down, to focus on community, and to think seriously about what we owe each other as fellow humans," publisher Alyson Forbes said in a statement. "Few writers have held so steadily to a single, clear-eyed vision across decades."  
Born in 1934, Wendell Berry was the first of four children of Virginia Erdman Berry and John Marshall Berry, a lawyer and tobacco farmer. Both the Erdmans and the Berrys farmed in Kentucky’s Henry County for at least five generations.  
Wendell earned a B.A. and M.A. in English at the University of Kentucky, and in 1958, pursuing his love of writing, he attended Stanford University’s creative writing program as a Wallace Stegner Fellow, studying under Stegner in a seminar that included Edward Abbey, Larry McMurtry, Robert Stone, Ernest Gaines, Tillie Olsen, and Ken Kesey.  
In 1965, Berry purchased a farm in Lanes Landing, Kentucky, near his parents’ birthplaces and began growing corn and small grains on what eventually became a 125-acre homestead.
He has wrote  at least twenty-five books of poems, sixteen volumes of essays, and eleven novels and short story collections. His writing was grounded in the notion that one’s work ought to be rooted in and responsive to one’s place. 
 For decades, Berry, as poet, essayist, fiction writer, and farmer, advocated personal activism on behalf of the environment. He wrote that there should not be a “split between what we think and what we do. Once our personal connection to what is wrong becomes clear, then we have to choose: we can go on as before, recognizing our dishonesty and living with it the best we can, or we can begin the effort to change the way we think and live.
 What Berry believed  was reflected in how he conducted his life. He was an activist in numerous areas of society.  
At the 1968 University of Kentucky conference on the War and the Draft, in “A Statement Against the War in Vietnam” Berry said: “I have come to the realization that I can no longer imagine a war that I would believe to be either useful or necessary. I would be against any war.” 
And in his essay, the “Failure of War” (1999) he wrote, “How many deaths of other people’s children . . . are we willing to accept in order that we may be free, affluent, and (supposedly) at peace? To that question I answer: None. . . . Don’t kill any children for my benefit.”  
In 1979 he participated in non
-violent civil disobedience against the construction of a nuclear power plant in Marble Hill, Indiana. His 2003 essay titled “A Citizen’s Response to the National Security Strategy of the United States,” was a critique of the George W. Bush administration’s post 9/11 international strategy that justified preemptive war, was published as a full-page advertisement in The New York Times.
 In it he asserted that “The new National Security Strategy published by the White House in September 2002, if carried out, would amount to a radical revision of the political character of our nation.”  Opposing the use of coal as an energy source, in 2009 Berry joined over 2,000 others in non-violently blocking the gates to a coal-fired power plant in Washington, D.C., and later that year combined with several non-profit organizations and rural electric co-op members to petition against and protest the construction of a coal-burning power plant in Clark County, Kentucky. As a result, in 2011 the Kentucky Public Service Commission cancelled the construction of this power plant.
On September 28, 2010 Berry participated in a rally in Louisville during an EPA hearing on how to manage coal ash. Berry said, “The EPA knows that coal ash is poison. We ask it only to believe in its own findings on this issue, and do its duty.”  
Berry, with fourteen other protesters, spent the weekend of February 12, 2011 locked in the Kentucky governor’s office demanding an end to mountaintop removal coal mining.  Through whatever he  wrote. Berry’s message  was constant: humans must learn to live in harmony with the natural rhythms of the earth or perish. 
In his opinion, we must acknowledge the impact of agriculture to our society. Berry believed that small-scale farming is essential to healthy local economies, and that strong local economies are essential to the survival of the species and the well-being of the planet. 
 He believed that besides relying on chemical pesticides and fertilizers, promoting soil erosion, and causing depletion of ancient aquifers, the growth of agribusiness has been a major cause of the disintegration of communities, driving many small farms out of existence, destroying rural communities in the process along with their moral  fibre  and  vision. 
 In 2009, he wrote, "Beware the machinery of longevity. When a man's life is over the decent thing is for him to die. The forest does not withhold itself from death. What it gives up it takes back."
His "cheerful dissent" reminded us that we are stewards of the land, bound by deep connection.Who  spoke  clearly  to  those  who  want  to  destroy  our  world.  
A man  who  spent almost a century proving you could make a whole world out of staying put.  
Wendell Berry stayed with one piece of Kentucky ground long enough to find nearly everything there: work, marriage, neighbors, grief, faith, greed, beauty, the living and the dead.  
While America kept treating movement as improvement, Berry kept asking what gets torn loose when everybody leaves, everything gets bigger, and nobody knows where the food came from or who is buried over the hill.  
His answers were plain. Know the ground. Know the people.Remember the dead. Try not to leave things worse than you found them. He understood that once land, work, food and consequence get far enough apart, ruining them gets easy.   
Throughout all his writings, Berry simply asked: How should human beings live well in a place? In the global mayhem of a corporatized world, Berry remained a fierce defender of local communities and an advocate for returning economic self-determination to the people. 
 'You can best serve civilization,' he wrote, 'by being against what usually passes for it.'"
Calling him a nature writer never made much sense to me.  Berry wrote about belonging to a place deeply enough that it could make demands of you. Now he belongs to that Kentucky ground too.
To many, Berry was an icon and a hero.  In 2011, President Barack Obama awarded him the National Humanities Medal. In 2015, he was the first living writer inducted into the Kentucky Writers Hall of Fame. 
In May of that year, a boxed set of his work was published by the Library of America – making him one of only two living writers at that time to have received the honor. Producers Terrence Malick and Robert Redford made a documentary feature film, "The Unforeseen," based on one of his poems.   
God  speed  sweet soul. The  world  is  a lesser  place  without  him. His words continue to ask us to live more gently, to honor the earth beneath our feet, and to find grace in the particular ground we are given.
His words have carried me through many times of darkness and uncertainty, always reminding me to look again—to the still water, the stars, the wild things and find grace. I will carry them with me always.

Manifesto: The Mad Farmer Liberation Front -    Wendell Erdman Berry,

Love the quick profit, the annual raise,   
vacation with pay. Want more     
of everything ready-made. Be afraid     
to know your neighbors and to die.     
And you will have a window in your head.     
Not even your future will be a mystery     
any more. Your mind will be punched in a card     
and shut away in a little drawer.    
When they want you to buy something     
they will call you. When they want you     
to die for profit they will let you know.      

So, friends, every day do something     
that won’t compute. Love the Lord.    
Love the world. Work for nothing.     
Take all that you have and be poor.   
Love someone who does not deserve it.     
Denounce the government and embrace   
the flag. Hope to live in that free    
republic for which it stands.     
Give your approval to all you cannot     
understand. Praise ignorance, for what man     
has not encountered he has not destroyed.      
Ask the questions that have no answers.     
Invest in the millennium. Plant sequoias.     
Say that your main crop is the forest     
that you did not plant,     
that you will not live to harvest.     
Say that the leaves are harvested    
when they have rotted into the mold.    
Call that profit. Prophesy such returns. 
     
Put your faith in the two inches of humus    
that will build under the trees     
every thousand years.     
Listen to carrion – put your ear     
close, and hear the faint chattering     
of the songs that are to come.     
Expect the end of the world. Laugh.     
Laughter is immeasurable. Be joyful    
though you have considered all the facts.     
So long as women do not go cheap     
for power, please women more than men.     
Ask yourself: Will this satisfy     
a woman satisfied to bear a child?     
Will this disturb the sleep     
of a woman near to giving birth?   
   
Go with your love to the fields.    
Lie down in the shade. Rest your head     
in her lap. Swear allegiance     
to what is nighest your thoughts.     
As soon as the generals and the politicos     
can predict the motions of your mind,    
lose it. Leave it as a sign     
to mark the false trail, the way     
you didn’t go. Be like the fox     
who makes more tracks than necessary,    
some in the wrong direction.     
Practice resurrection.

The Peace of Wild Things - Wendell Erdman Berry

When despair for the world grows in me 
and I wake in the night at the least sound 
in fear of what my life and my children’s lives may be, 
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things 
who do not tax their lives with forethought of grief. 
I come into the presence of still water. 
And I feel above me the day-blind stars 
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.