Thursday, 21 April 2022

Happy birthday Mrs Windsor.

 

 

Today the Queen otherwise known as Mrs Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor, turns 96,  a long life indeed, she happens to share a birthday with my own grandson who himself turns 10 today, so salutations to him as well. 
Gun salutes will mark Mrs Windsor birthday today, although the monarch herself was expected to mark the occasion with little fanfare after a troubled year hit by health concerns.
Royal officials released a photograph of the horse-loving head of state with two of her fell ponies, as family members wished her well.
Her grandson Prince William and his wife Kate called her "an inspiration to so many across the UK, the Commonwealth and the world."
In the British capital, 62 gun rounds will be fired later from the Tower of London and 42 in Hyde Park, where a military band will also play "Happy Birthday."
Royal tradition since the 18th century has also seen the monarch have a second, official birthday, typically celebrated in warmer weather in June.
This year's official birthday coincides with four days of public events from June 2 to 5 to mark the queen's record-breaking 70th year on the throne.
No official engagements are planned for today and the queen is spending time at her late husband Prince Philip's cottage on her Sandringham country estate, where he lived after retiring from public life in 2017.
The trip is being seen as a "positive step", given the queen's recent health problems, British media reported.
Since an unscheduled overnight stay in hospital last October, she has cut down massively on public appearances on doctor's orders.
A back complaint and difficulties standing and walking have seen her cancel a number of engagements, including recent church events to mark Easter.
A bout of Covid-19 in February left her "very tired and exhausted", she admitted earlier this month.
But William's brother Prince Harry told US broadcaster NBC in an interview aired on Wednesday that she was "on great form" when he saw her last week.
The queen was last seen in public at Westminster Abbey in central London on March 29 at a memorial service for Prince Philip, who died last year aged 99.
The queen's enforced retreat from public life in her Platinum Jubilee year has increased attention on the succession and future of the monarchy.
Her eldest son and heir, Prince Charles, has assumed more of his mother's responsibilities in preparation to take over the throne.But a fair few believe Charles, 73, should step aside for William, who turns 40 in June.
Aside from questions about the queen's health and the succession, the royals have rarely been out of the headlines due to a succession of scandals.
Last month there was controversy after the queen's disgraced second son Prince Andrew supported her at Prince Philip's memorial service.
In February, he settled a US civil claim for sexual assault that had earlier seen him stripped of his honorary royal military titles and charitable roles.Andrew’s self-inflicted humiliation has shone a withering spotlight on a spoilt stupid man who has lived a life of unimaginable privilege without having to do anything to earn it. Let Prince Andrew be the very last of the royal freeloaders sunning their bloated bellies on some dodgy billionaire’s yacht.
The palace is said to be bracing for fresh revelations about royal life from Harry, who is due to publish his memoirs later this year.
The former British Army captain quit the royal frontline last year and moved to California with his American wife Meghan Markle.
From there, the couple accused the royal family of racism, while Harry claimed his father Charles and brother William were "trapped" within the system of the British monarchy.
The future of the royal family's global reach is also far from assured.
The queen is head of state of Britain and 14 other Commonwealth countries around the world. But Barbados became a republic last year and a number of other Caribbean countries, including Jamaica, have since indicated they want to follow suit.
Many of Mrs Windsor's subjects instead of joining in the sycophantic celebrations that will be taking place later this year  would instead actually like to have a debate about Britain's future. After all no-one should be head of state for decades without any elections.
A long life is not an excuse in itself for a long reign. The fact that the Queen is now the longest reigning monarch I do not see in itself as a cause for celebration, but an opportunity and reminder of how much we  need real radical democratic reform. Millions of us are simply not interested anymore in royal milestones, in times of austerity,facing a crippling cost of living crisis, harder times, a winter of discontent,  who  as usual are being denied the opportunity to hear any real debate about the future of the monarchy. 
Anti-monarchy group Republic is set to launch a "Not Another 70" campaign, aimed at calling for an end to the monarchy.The campaign will coincide with the run up to the Queen's Jubilee, and will culminate in a conference on the weekend of June 2nd.
Graham Smith, speaking for Republic, said :
"While a vocal minority will want to celebrate the Queen's seventy year reign, we must all start looking to the future. The prospect of King Charles is not a happy one, and there is a good, democratic alternative on offer."
"It's time to have a serious debate about our constitution, accept that Charles is not the best the country has to offer, and that as a nation we are quite capable of choosing our head of state."
"It's time to reject the nonsense arguments about tourism, stability and widespread affection for the royals, and take a more sensible look at what the monarchy really is, and what it really costs the country."
"That cost isn't just financial, it is a cost to our democracy, to our status as citizens and to our principles."
"In just twelve months the royals have been accused of racism, climate change hypocrisy, abuse of public funds, secrecy, cash-for-honours, cash-for-access and all the various things associated with Prince Andrew, including sheltering him from justice."
"This is a shabby institution that does not deserve to continue. It is set against our nation's deeply held democratic principles, it is corrupt and secretive and it is bad for British democracy."
"Now is the time to look to a democratic future, a future without the monarchy."
Details of the "Not Another 70" campaign will be released in due course.
It's about time  we held a referendum on the future of the British monarchy after the Queen's death. Is it not the case that as long as we remain subjects not citizens, of our country, our political and social attitudes will continue to retain an archaic flavour that is harmful equally to our image  of ourselves and attitude of others towards us. Until we turn our back on  hereditary  power at the top of our political, military and religious institutions we have little chance of shaking of the mentality of society defined by class that serves to prop up the same elitist status quo.
Prince Charles  is next in line to the throne. But public opinion suggests that he is not the most popular member of the Royal family, Given that he did have an affair with none other than Duchess Camilla while he was married to the late Princess Diana. 
Not only that, but reports also suggested that Prince Charles was the one who had expressed reservations about Prince Harry’s son Archie’s skin color.
Once Mrs Windsor has gone the future of the monarchy looks very bleak.
How can the Royal family survive? How can we continue to tolerate a hereditary monarch representing the feudal society of medieval England in a modern democratic state. How is it is still acceptable that the British taxpayer still has to pay £75,000,000 a year to support one of the richest families in Britain ( wealth accumulated and robbed from people during previous centuries) when people are made homeless, forced to sleep on the streets, how can we justify spending this on relics that serve no purpose while 13 million of us are in poverty and 913,000 of us are having to rely on foodbanks.The monarchy like slavery , sexual and class discrimination and colonial exploitation is a throwback to our shameful past and an impediment to a bright future.Increasing numbers of people are now finally starting to see the unelected, parasitical Royals for what they are. 
So happy birthday Mrs Windsor, she's had a long 'glorious' reign. but please let the British public decide now whether we want her or not. For some she remains a strong figurehead as our head of state,steadfast, constant, dutiful, regal, wise and respectful,  an an image carefully orchestrated by PR and media, but for others a constant  reminder that  she is nothing more than an undemocratically elected individual who  has succeeded only in serving the monarchy and the status quo whilst robbing the taxpayers money for  her and her greedy family.  
It is now time for the country to look to the future. The monarchy is outdated and does not serve our modern needs, just an irrelevent drain on our society. It's time to end this symbol of privilege once and for all .Viva republic. No pictures of Mrs Windsor with ponies, here's one of my grandson instead.


 

Sunday, 17 April 2022

Palestinian Prisoner's Day 2022

 

Today marks Palestinian Prisoners Day, a day that also serves to express solidarity with the thousands of Palestinian political prisoners held in Israeli jails. It is also used as a means to illustrate the Israeli army's excessive and often lethal use of force against peaceful and unarmed demonstrators throughout the West Bank and Gaza, 
A day for Palestinian people and supporters of justice and liberation for Palestine worldwide to express  their support to Palestinian political prisoners of freedom.Commemorated since 1974, when , Mahmoud Hizazi  was freed in a prisoner exchange with the Palestinian resistance, Palestinian Prisoner Day was founded to remind the world of the thousands of Palestinian political prisoners imprisoned in Israeli  occupied  prisons or detention centers without charge or trial for extensive periods of time. It is a day to demand their freedom.
In Palestine, political imprisonment is a central feature of Israeli Apartheid with over 20% of Palestinians facing imprisonment in their lifetime.Since Israeli began its military occupation of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip in 1967, more than 800,000 Palestinians have been abducted and imprisoned by Israel.  This figure represents 20% of the total Palestinian population and 40% of the Palestinian male population. 
 In 2010, Israel issued Military Order 1651 which imposes a 10-year sentence on anyone who attempts to influence public opinion in the West Bank in a manner which they deem to harm public order or publishes words of praise for a hostile organization which it defines as incitement
 For years, the Israeli army has used such broad military orders to intimidate and arrest Palestinian human rights activists who engage in non-violent protests. This essentially allows Israel to criminalise resistanncetance to an occupation that is illegal under international law.
A core part of what sustains the Israeli occupation is a military judicial system characterised by violations of international law. This dual legal system that Palestinians face is reminiscent of apartheid South Africa.
Currently, there are 4,450 Palestinians incarcerated by Israel, including 160 children under the age of 18, and 32 female prisoners, including one female minor. The vast majority of Palestinian prisoners are imprisoned in Israeli prisons inside the Green Line, amounting to acts of forcible transfer from the occupied territory, in violation of Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention (1949).
Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons continue to face systematic ill-treatment and torture. Currently, more than 600 Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons suffer from a wide range of illnesses and lack of access to proper medical care, 200 of them have been diagnosed with chronic diseases, including 22 who have been diagnosed with cancer.
The most serious case is that of Naser Abu Hamid, who is in a critical condition and suffering from lung cancer.
Additionally, Israel is holding 530 Palestinian under administrative detention, a procedure whereby Israel incarcerates Palestinians without trial based on ‘secret information, in violation of the right to due process and a fair procedure under Articles 9 and 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and a war crime under Article 8 (2)(a)(vi) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Since January 2022, Israel has arrested more than 2,140 Palestinians according to a joint statement issued by prisoners’ organizations. These arrests have particularly intensified since March and the start of Ramadan, with sweeping raids and arrests taking place in Jenin and Jerusalem.
On Friday morning April 15th, the Israeli Occupying Forces (IOF) raided the Al-Aqsa mosque and conducted mass arrests of more than 450 Palestinians from the Al-Aqsa compound after having attacked worshippers prior to the dawn prayer.
This year alone, Israel has issued approximately 400 administrative detention orders against Palestinians, most of which are renewals of previous detention orders. Administrative detainees are prohibited from their right to a fair trial, including the reasons for their arrest. The detention periods are usually issued for six months periods subject to renewal and Israel’s military courts may extend their detention indefinitely on this basis.
On 1 January 2022, around 500 Palestinian administrative detainees launched a campaign to boycott Israel’s military courts in protest against their arbitrary arrests by Israel’s apartheid regime.
This collective disobedience intends to highlight the inhuman and degrading punishment of Palestinians based on ‘secret information.
Palestinian Prisoner Day was founded to remind the world of the thousands of Palestinian political prisoners imprisoned in Israeli prisons or detention centers without charge or trial for extensive periods of time.who continue to be subject to wide-ranging violations of their rights and dignity.. The number of Palestinian detainess increases as Israeli occupying forces continue to wage campaigns of arbitrary arrests and detentions against thousands of Palestinians.
Investigations have revealed that prisoners are regularly subject to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, including poor detention conditions, in violation of Israel's obligations under international human rights and humanitarian law. 
Detention facilities and prisons in Israel have long been criticized  for overcrowding, unsanitary conditions, and inadequate access to healthcare. The majority of Palestinians in Israeli custody are defined as “security” prisoners by the Israeli Prison Service (IPS), which entails special restrictions that regular criminal prisoners do not face, such as the denial of phone calls.
Since the beginning of the year, apartheid Israel’s occupation forces have inflicted a campaign of collective punishment via violent mass arrest on the city of Jenin in the north of the illegally occupied West Bank. More than 200 of the city's residents have been arrested, with 100 arrests taking place in March alone. According to the Palestinian Prisoners Club there are approximately 500 Palestinian political prisoners from Jenin in Israeli jails, including three women and around 10 children. 
On March 2022, the UN Human Rights Committee called on Israel to “immediately put an end to the widespread practice of arbitrary arrests and detention, including administrative detention, of Palestinians, in particular children.
It should ensure that Palestinian detainees, including those held in administrative detention, are provided with all legal and procedural safeguards, including the rights to be informed of the reason for their arrest and detention, to access legal counsel, and be brought promptly before a judge, and to notify a person of the choice of their detention, in line with article 9 of the Covenant”.
Every day, Palestinian prisoners are on the front lines of struggle, facing torturous interrogation , nighttime raids, solitary confinement, and relentless attacks on their rights at the hands of Israeli occupation forces.
In a period when violence and arrests against Palestinians are being escalated, we should support the international communities efforts to ensure the immediate and effective measures to ensure that Israel releases all unlawfully detained  Palestinian political prisoners from the Israeli jails, and ensures that conditions of arrest are consistent with international human rights and humanitarian law.
As the rights of 4.500 Palestinian prisoners are violated, and the Israeli occupation army continues to arrest Palestinian children and teenagers and imprison them in barbaric conditions. We should especially urge for the immediate liberation of around 160 child prisoners, as well as of women, sick and disabled prisoners.

 Further information and resources are available at:
  • Addameer (Prisoner Support & Human Rights Association)
  • Samidoun (Palestinian Prisoners Solidarity Network)
     
     Prisoner of Palestine- Seize the Day  



Friday, 15 April 2022

The Tories Rwanda asylum plans are racist, cruel and inhumane.

 

The Tories want to shamefully deport tens of thousands of refugees seeking safety in Britain to Rwanda. Home secretary Priti Patel signed the £120 million deal on Thursday with the east African country, thousands of miles from Britain. Any refugee who’s forced to come to Britain through an “illegal route”—such as crossing the English Channel in a boat, will have a “one-way ticket” to Rwanda. The move will make Britain’s brutal and racist immigration system even worse,and lead to more deaths of people fleeing war, poverty and dictatorship. The plan has been met with outrage,.with U.K. opposition politicians and refugee groups condemning the move as inhumane, unworkable and a waste of public money.
Among these are the United Nations who said it raised “a number of human rights concerns.” with it's regigge coincil declaring it to be " unaxxeptable " and in breach of international law.
The Refugee Action charity said, “Offshoring people 5,000 miles away is a grubby cash-for-people plan and a cowardly, barbaric and inhumane way to treat people fleeing persecution and war.” 
Stand Up To Racism said, “We condemn the disgusting, racist and inhumane move to ‘offshore’ those seeking asylum to Rwanda, and support the emergency protests that have been called, so far in London and in Glasgow. This despicable policy is part of a wider intensification of the racist ‘hostile environment’.” 
 Steve Valdez-Symonds, refugee director at Amnesty International U.K., said the British government’s “shockingly ill-conceived idea will go far further in inflicting suffering while wasting huge amounts of public money.” 
The UK Government’s racist plans is not the way to treat people seeking safety and sanctuary.This is nothing more than a cynical distraction from the Prime Minister’s law breaking. 
People need to stop saying that refugees will be sent to Rwanda for ‘processing’. The policy is to send them there forever - there is no return. It is grotesquely cruel, immoral,shameful and orwellian. This is people trafficking by the Government. They are bribing Rwanda with development funds. It breaches the Refugee Convention.and the anti-trafficking conventions we have signed up to, Which we helped draft when we were still a civilised nation.
The Rwandan government said the agreement would initially last for five years, and Britain had paid 120 million pounds ($158 million) up front to pay for housing and integrating the migrants. Rwandan Foreign Affairs Minister Vincent Biruta said the agreement “is about ensuring that people are protected, respected, and empowered to further their own ambitions and settle permanently in Rwanda if they choose.” He said his country is already home to more than 130,000 refugees from countries including Burundi, Congo, Libya and Pakistan. 
What he did not say is that Rwanda has a horrendous human rights record where people 'disappear' on a regular basis, Lewis Mudge, Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch, said the claim Rwanda was a safe country “is not grounded in reality.” “Arbitrary detention, ill-treatment, and torture in official and unofficial detention facilities is commonplace, and fair trial standards are flouted in many cases,” Mudge said.
.In 1998 the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda for the first time in inter. criminal law found that rape was a form of genocide in the Akayesu case.Tutsi women were systematically raped and killed. It takes decades for such scars to heal. Rwanda isn't a place for refugees.
What about the Rwandan refugees who had their visa applications accepted by the U.K. Home Office last year who deemed Rwanda as a humanitarian concern great enough to grant sanctuary to hundreds of people fleeing persecution. Tories staying tight lipped on that naturally. We are sending people to a state from which we are receiving refugees.It defies all logic and reason. And on top of this the UK recently condemned Rwanda for human rights abuses and now has shamelessly signed a deal to set up Concentration Camps fpr Refugees who are mostly coming from countries that UK/US destroyed mercilessly. As LGBT individuals have faced persecution in Rwanda, how can the UK justify sending LGBT refugees to the country for processing.
The British establishment's real crime is creating those refugees in the first place by bombing, sanctioning and plundering their countries. The blood of millions on their hands. 
Nothing can be more heartbreaking than having to flee the place you have been born and brought up in,
70 million people are currently displaced from their homes on account of persecution, conflict, violence or human rights violations, of these, approximately 25 million are refugees, over half of whom are children under the age of 18, having being forced to leave their home country and take perilous journeys to cross international and national boundaries in search of safety elsewhere. A far larger number of people are displaced within their own country (internally displaced) or displaced for reasons which go beyond persecution and conflict, including drought, hunger, environmental disasters and the effects of climate change. The language used to discuss this Refugee/Rwanda issue is monstrous. BBC reporters asking Rwandan govt: ‘How much money do you want per refugee?’. And ‘outsourcing refugees’. These are people. This is the language of selling fellow human beings. We’re in evil, hellish territory.
Australia, infamous for 'offshoring' refugees, to Papua New Guinea and the tiny inlet of Nauru, vowing that none would be allowed to settle in Australia.is the inspiration for heroic war leader Boris Johnson's grotesque plan to send refugees, who brave the Channel, to Rwanda. The policy was widely criticized as a cruel abrogation of Australia’s international obligations. and described as 'torture' by the UN.
Israel sent several thousand people to Rwanda and Uganda under a contentious and secretive “voluntary” scheme between 2014 and 2017. Few are believed to have remained there, with many trying to reach Europe. It is almost certain that the relocation plans will face legal challenge if or when they come into operation with lawyers saying the set up breaches several articles of the refugee convention.
The Refugee Convention prohibits contracting states from imposing penalties on those entering illegally. Arguably sending asylum seekers to Rwanda does amount to a penalty and will be found unlawful. Imagine taking a private plane you painted in 🇬🇧 flags at taxpayer expense for a PR stunt in Rwanda because you plan to spend billions processing migrants there whilst Ukraine refugees give up on the UK because you made it so hard to get in.. All done by the daughter of migrants.
This ghastly,evil fascist fiend was actually smiling as she talked about her new plan to send refugees to Rwanda concentration camps, for processing . When the dust has settled and everyone has woken up,I trust these disgusting Tory Ministers and sycophant MPs will be whisked off to prison as quickly as they send refugees to Rwanda.
What has this country become? Sending vulnerable refugees to Rwanda is an ugly racist policy. It will cost a shit load more than being a decent society, that treats human beings with dignity, not like rubbish to be dumped wherever will take our cash. 
 The UN, amnesty international and the refugee council have all stated this will endanger lives I have never been more ashamed of being British. People claiming they stand with Ukraine yet approve a measure that could see desperate Ukrainian refugees sent to Rwanda by the British government they themselves support is a great example of cognitive dissonance. A small minority outraged. Many racists delighted. The majority more interested in Strictly, Bake off, East Enders, Champions League, Top Gear et al. As Ian Kershaw said"The road to Auschwitz was built by by hate, but paved with indifference.
We can’t let this cruel and dangerous plan go ahead, it is unethical, unworkable and, most importantly for the Tory's voter base, unaffordable. The UK will be pouring untold amounts of money into this ludicrous scheme while citizens in this country are unable to afford their gas and electricity bills unsupported by the government. It must ne fought at all costs.
It robs people of their dignity, flies in the dace of British values of compassion and decencyns . We have heardaout the horrific conditions for asylum seekers who are placed in barracks and hotels in the IK and the physical and mental problems they cause.
People fleeing for their lives from war and persecution  should be treated with kindness not like criminals. Whatever our differences, we have to recognise our fundamental human obligation to shelter those fleeing from war and persecution, Richer nations must acknowledge refugees for the victims they are, fleeing from wars they were unable to prevent or stop. History has shown that doing the right thing for victims of war and persecution engenders goodwill and prosperity for generations, And it fosters stablity in the long run.
The Tories’ much maligned Nationality and Borders Bill is currently stuck between the House of Commons and Lords. Returning to the Commons next week, after being defeated twice by the Lords, the bill would criminalise any refugee crossing the channel with a penalty of imprisonment of up to four years. It must be vehemently opposed. 
The Rwanda plan is a dead cat to deflect from Boris Johnsons lies and criminality, we must not allow them to allow this to happen. Today and tomorrow we must continue to stand up for refugees, and say.they are welcome here, and to help refugees restore their lives,be treated with respect and dignity and allow their voices to remain visible and heard, yo continue to build bridges not more obstacles or borders. As Tories plan to dump asylum seekers in Rwanda, let us remember Tony Benn’s words "The way a government treats refugees is very instructive because it shows you how they would treat the rest of us if they thought they could get away with it."

Wednesday, 13 April 2022

Boris Johnson must resign !


The first serving PM in British history to be fined is clinging grimly to office. The question is not whether Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak should resign after breaking the law and the Ministerial Code - of course they should. A Prime Minister who breaks the laws his Government makes and then lies about it isn't fit for office.
Families made huge sacrifices and obeyed the law. Many said their last goodbyes to loved ones on the phone while the Prime Minister partied. Remember  when Boris Johnson said he was "furious" to see footage of staff joking about holding illegal parties in Downing Street. All the while he knew he had attended them himself.
Boris Johnson  and Rishi Sunak have broken the law and repeatedly lied to the British public.With more than 50 people now having been fined over Downing Street parties during lockdown the widespread criminality over which he has presided whilst in office is breathtaking they must resign to immediate effect . Johnson is a bare-faced liar and  screw-you law-breaker who’s made utter fools of us all. The Prime Minister’s position is completely untenable. There simply cannot be one rule for the Tories and another for the rest of us. 
The question is what can we do when they refuse and the PM is the only one with the power to police it? We can't go on like this. The claim that Johnson can't resign during a war is beyond ridiculous.  The UK is not at war. The  French are currently having a presidential election. A war in Ukraine should not be used as an excuse for letting that slime ball Johnson squat in Downing Street.
The fact that this government is using victims of war as a morally unacceptable excuse to keep this creep in power while denying the victims refuge and.Tory politicians are taking to social media and the airwaves to downplay  Boris Johnson  and Rishi Sunak’s lawbreaking and lying, whilst also cynically using the blood of dead Ukrainians as a shield, is one of the most revolting episodes I’ve witnessed yet. A political and moral sewer. Edwina Currie,  Jacob Rees-Mogg, Grant Shapps, Nadine Dorries, Priti Patel are just  some of the Tories who have come out in defence of them and Tories wonder why people call them Tory scum? 
I'm sure the UK can find a temporary substitute PM until an election 'can be held to oust the Tories for good. They just don't want to, because they know that public opinion of them now is as low as it's ever been. Other PMs have resigned at times of far greater crisis. How many more lies and ministerial code breaking are to be tolerated because it's 'the wrong time or relatively trivial'. One thing is for sure, cultural and moral values won't change under his leadership. He is obliged to go and until he does, I cannot see how, in these circumstances, the UK can be said to be a functioning democracy, at this moment in time the Conservatives are totally unfit to govern. Please don't turn on Sky news, it would be a  huge mistake! It's a Boris Johnson love-in.  All said and done we need fundamental system  change, but shame on anyone and everyone who votes Tory at the May elections.  Fucking shame on them.

Tuesday, 12 April 2022

Britain can't afford another Tory Government.



Selflessness. Integrity. Objectivity. Accountability. Openness. Honesty. Leadership.’ These are the Seven Principles devised by Lord Nolan’s 1994 Committee on Standards in Public Life to promote a code of conduct that all public servants should follow. It is increasingly apparent that our country has elected a government that is attempting to rip to shreds all of these rules.
 Lord Acton famously once said: ‘power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’: ambitious people who think themselves untouchable tend to bend the rules for their purposes. What shocks me so much the most , is with the level of corruption we are seeing in our country at the moment, how this country has become so  numb to it. This is unsurprising based on our incumbent primus inter pares: Boris Johnson who has paved the  way for an unprecedented level of sleaze and scandal
That  features the  Conservative government’ social distancing breaches, partygate, unethical contracts funding Tory-linked organisations, tax evasion, combined with their failure in the pandemic,  Brexit, Exports, NHS Social care, Track & trace, HMRC’s ability to tackle tax cheats,the justice system,the benefits system ,education , personal liberties , police impartiality, the rule of law, growing poverty, wealth inequality, spiralling inflation  and the rising cost of living. And given the reluctance to welcome Ukrainians and the failure to ban Therapy on Trans folk, there is clearly a nasty and bigoted streak in the Conservative party.  I' seriously can't find any success note whatsoever,.
And after being the first British  Prme Minister in history to be found  breaking the law,alongide his chabcellor, plus lying to  Parlament and breaching the Ministerial Code, this is all all very serious stuff ,there must be some form of accountability, and at same time  you have to ask:yourself  how the hell the Tories are still running the country? 
Well it has been a long established that the Conservative party and their leader lies. In fact, it’s probably their second most identifiable characteristic after being nasty.These lies are not accidental, it is a deliberate exercise to try and keep in control. When they claim  to understand, this simply means they don't care at all, and when they talk about building a stronger Britain, it wont be for all of us, those less fortunate, it will for all their friends at the top of the pile. They have overseen a 11% or more increase in the wealth of the richest, while everyone else has seen their income stagnate at best - or in most cases sink. They have introduced vile, vicious policies attacking the poor; whether employed, jobless or sick/disabled - which have led to a vast increase in poverty, and homelessness, including a 2000% rise in foodbank use (from 48,000 to 1 million plus users.) They will continue to issue platitudes that  they say will be the benefit of us all while presiding over policies that have the opposite effect. We have to keep challenging their distorted narratives.
The desperate letter from more than 550 food banks warning Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak that they are close to “breaking point” from an unsustainable surge in demand during the cost of living crisis.and saying they risk "running out of food" ought to be at the top of every agenda. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/food-banks-rishi-sunak-living-costs-b2054244.html
Foodbank users are currently declinining potatoes and root vegetables as they cannot afford the fuel to cook with them. This is happenining in the fifth richest country with more billionaires than ever before. There is no limit to Tory cruelty. 
Meanwhile our millionaire Chancellor is busy with his tax affairs and our PM is playing Churchill.
The 3.1 per cent benefits increase that came into effect  yesterday does not match inflation, which is expected to hit 7.7 per cent this month.This will result in the greatest fall in the value of the basic rate of unemployment benefit in 50 years, according to an analysis by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 600,000 more people will be pulled into poverty because Tories refuse to help those most in need. The government's broken promise to keep the state pension triple lock will cost pnioners about £500 a year, because the state pension will increase by only 3.1% instad of the 8.3% due under the triple lock formula. Yet since these decisions were taken inflation  has soared and is now xpected to exceed 8%, this year, which means pensioners are facing a significant real terms fall in income this year,
It's worth remembering that the week before they voted through thee ral trms cuts to benefits Tory MPs voted to give bankers a multi billion tax cut.
Please consider signing the following petition to get them to raie benefits in line with inflation.https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/612152 ..without further help millons will freeze and starve this coming winter. This isn't a cost of living crisis it's an enforced poverty crisis engineered by the rich.The Tories got away with austerity whilst enriching themselves, and robbing the country blind during the pandemic. The recent energy price hike is not only going to be impossible for millions, it will undermine the economy. Every pound going towards the energy companies is a pound not going into other commodities or services. Why hasn’t the government the wisdom to see the looming disaster? People will have no money to spend on other stuff and that that will affect the profits of other businesses ( like non essential retail or hospitality , leisure etc ) which will see a massive reduction in vat and corporate Taxes that those businesses pay. This reduces Government income and takes money out of the general economy. The most worrying  thing is that the level of poverty its creating will take years to resolve.
Ir's  all a complete mess, but still the Tories cling on to power.Not, even Thatcher's era was as bad as this. Maybe during the time of the corn laws, Napoleon rampaging across Europe etc. Ask Jacob Reece Mogg.  We  simply cannot afford  a further Tory Government that allows them to continue with their tactics of public obfuscation and diversion, and politics of cruelty, but when I look at the opposition to them in parliament I only see more bloody tories.so I'm reaching the point of desperation, the whole damn system is essentially rotten, and a real alternative is needed urgently.Enough is enough, there has to be another way.
The  threats to our lives, is very real  if Johnson and co remain in power, with there lies, spin, and broken promies, as they keep wrecking the economy. They are  ideologically authoritarian and total incompetent, a real and constant danger. Hopefullly the Tories game is coming to a very messy end before too long, anybody who decides to vote for them is an absolute fool.Kick out the Tories.

Saturday, 9 April 2022

Celebrating the life of Charles Baudelaire, Poet Extraordinaire


The great French poet Charles-Pierre Baudelaire, whose powerful writing ushered in a era of symbolism, was born in Paris on the 4th of April 1821. Not only a poet of stunning imagery and extraordinary musicality, he was also one of the first to herald that new consciousness, urban, pushing at the edges of things, uncertain of itself,  which we, today, still recognize as our own modern way of being.
Baudelaire life was almost as important as his poetry.  His rejection of bourgeois values, his use of drugs, his fascination with sex, his close friendships with painters and other poets: all of these made him a sort of model for the poet as a 'bohemian' figure.  He is the archetype of the poet as someone who lives his own life on the fringes of society, rebellious in life style, dedicated to moving so far beyond the middle class that his work shocks them so deeply that their either cry out, 'But is it art?' or attempt to censor it as blasphemous, evil, pornographic.
His father, Joseph-François Baudelaire, was a middle ranking civil servant, on his sicties who began his career as a priest and tutor His mother Caroline was much younger than her husband, and had only been twenty-six when she married his father,  two years earlier. She was an orphan with no prospects, which may explain why she married a much older man, and Charles was their only child. Charles seems to have been severely spoilt by his mother in his youth, something which only intensified in 1827 when Francois died at the age of 68 when he Charles was five.
In 1828 Caroline remarried to Jacques Aupick, a half-Irish military officer,giving birth to a still-born child a month later. Because he was no longer the center of his mother’s attention, the incident greatly affected him..
Charles was a smart and gifted student, though given to contrariness and laziness. He generally did well at school in Lyons and Paris, with his natural intelligence helping to counteract this lack of dedication. Despite this, at the age of 17 he was expelled from school for insolence after he refused to give the teacher a note that he had been passed by a classmate. Despite his expulsion, he still took and passed the baccalauréat the same year.
Baudelaire spent the next two years in Paris' Latin Quarter pursuing a career as a writer and accumulating debt. Baudelaire pursued his literary aspirations in earnest but, in order to appease his parents, he agreed to enrol as a "nominal" (non-attending) law student at the École de Droit.His tortured relations with his mother and stepfather are considered by certain biographers to be the foundation of his erratic characterbious  and behaviour (Baudelaire referred to his stepfather as “The General”).
Taking up residence in Paris's Latin Quarter, Baudelaire embarked on a life of promiscuity and social self-indulgence. He sexual encounters (including those with a prostitute, affectionately nicknamed "Squint-Eyed Sarah", who became the subject of some of his most candid and touching early poems) led him to contract syphilis. The venereal disease would lead ultimately to his death but he did not let it dent his bohemian lifestyle which he indulged in with a circle of friends including the poet Gustave Le Vavasseur and the author Ernest Prarond.
In 1841 his parents sent him on ship to India, hoping the experience would help reform his bohemian urges. He left the ship, however, and returned to Paris in 1842. Upon his return, he received a large inheritance, which allowed him to live the life of a Parisian dandy. He developed a love for clothing and spent his days in the art galleries and cafes of Paris. He experimented with drugs such as hashish and opium. 
He fell in love with Jeanne Duval,a Haitian-born actress and dancer of mixed French and black African ancestry, who inspired the "Black Venus" section of Les Fleurs du mal.Duval would come in and out of his life for the rest of his years, and inspired some of Baudelaire's most personal and romantic poetry (including "La Chevelure" ("The Head of Hair")). Baudelaire's mother disapproved of the fact that her son's muse was a poor, racially-blended, actress and his connection with her further tested their already strained relationship
By 1844, he had spent nearly half of his inheritance. His family won a court order that appointed a lawyer to manage Baudelaire's fortune and pay him a small "allowance" for the rest of his life.
For the remainder of Baudelaire’s short life, he begged for money from his mother, friends and publisher. He constantly fled creditors, living at some 40 different addresses in Paris. He fell into a deep depression and in June of 1845 he attempted suicide.
To supplement his income, Baudelaire wrote art criticism, essays, and reviews for various journals. His early criticism of contemporary French painters such as Eugene Delacroix and Gustave Courbet earned him a reputation as a discriminating if idiosyncratic critic. In 1847, he published the autobiographical novella La Fanfarlo. His first publications of poetry also began to appear in journals in the mid-1840s. Charles Baudelaire became acquainted with Edgar Allan Poe in 1847 and came across varied themes in Poe’s poetry that he felt a deep connection with. In 1854 and 1855, he published translations of Edgar Allan Poe, whom he called a "twin soul." His translations were widely acclaimed. 
 He was also intimate of many prominent contemporaries, from Victor Hugo, Honoré de Balzac, and Gustave Flaubert to Franz Liszt and Édouard Manet.
Baudelaire coined the term Flâneur in his essay The Painter of Modern Life (1863). A Flâneur is a rather dilettante observer, a person of leisure, an urban explorer. While others at this point in history had seen flâneurs in a negative light and tried to paint them as unmotivated, indecisive men, Baudelaire held the flâneur in high esteem.
According to Wikipedia, Baudelaire is also credited with the term modernity, meaning the fleeting, ephemeral experience of life in an urban metropolis, and the responsibility of artistic expression to capture that experience.
Baudelaire’s poetry was groundbreaking for its time, drawing from the Romantic tradition but rejecting nature and essential goodness as its organizing themes. Instead, he created a poetry of the modern, which incorporated urban imagery and subjects; a complex morality that dwelled on decadence, death, and sin; and symbols and sensory elements that gave his works a primal resonance.
Apart from his literary contributions, Baudelaire also participated in the French Revolution of 1848 that lead to the overthrow of the constitutional monarchy.He had shown no radical political allegiances hitherto (if anything had been more sympathetic towards the interests of the petit-bourgeois class in which he had been born) and many in his circle were taken aback by his actions.
It is possible (likely even) that his actions were an attempt to anger his family; especially his stepfather who was a symbol of the French establishment (some unsubstantiated accounts suggest Baudelaire was seen brandishing a musket and urging insurgents to "shoot general Aupick").It is said he even tried to organise a squad of revolutionaries to go and shoot his step-father. As the riots were quickly put down by King Charles X, Baudelaire was once more absorbed by his literary pursuits and in 1848 he co-founded a news-sheet entitled Le Salut Public. Though funds only allowed for two issues it helped raise Baudelaire's creative profile. Baudelaire also took an active part in the resistance to the Bonapartist military coup in December 1851 but declared soon after that his involvement in political matters was over and he would, henceforward, devote all his intellectual passions to his writings.
In 1865 he wrote: “Yes! Hurrah for the Revolution! Always! In spite of all! But me, I am no dupe, I have never been a dupe. I cry Hurrah for the Republic the way I would cry Hurrah for Destruction! Hurrah for Expiation! Hurrah for Punishment! Hurrah for Death" 
Baudelaire was also a dandy, clean-shaven in an age of whiskers and dressed immaculately despite squalid domestic circumstances. Never ostentatious, he wore sombre black in mourning for his times.
Considering nature to be tyrannical, he championed everything which fought or transcended it, while being, like many of his contemporaries, overtly misogynistic. “Woman is natural. That is to say, abominable,”he wrote.
Nevertheless, he recognised how both genders were trapped within their fleshly prisons and urged resistance to such incarceration through costume and cosmetics, recreational sex, drugs and alcohol.A self conscious decadent who believed in Original Sin and his poetry was largely a reflection on his own damnation. He flaunted bourgeois norms, and it wasn’t enough to reject the culture of the stolid bourgeois. It had to be attacked and torn down.
Baudelaire's reputation as a rebel poet was confirmed in June 1857 with the publication of his masterpiece Les Fleurs du Mal (The Flowers of Evil). Although an anthology, Baudelaire insisted that the individual poems only achieved their full meaning when read in relation to one another; as part of a "singular framework" as he put it. In addition to its shifting views of romantic and physical love, the collected pieces covered Baudelaire's views on art, beauty, and the idea of the artist as martyr, visionary, pariah and/or even fool.
Now considered a landmark in French literary history, it met with controversy on publication when a selection of 13 (from 100) poems were denounced by the press as pornographic. On July 7, 1857 the Ministry of the Interior arranged for a case to be brought before the public prosecutor on charges relating to public morality. Unsold copies of the book were seized and a trial was held on the 20th of August when six of the poems were found to be indecent. As well as the demand to remove the offending entries, Baudelaire received a fine of 50 francs (reduced on appeal from 300 francs). Disgusted by the court's decision, Baudelaire refused to let his publisher remove the poems and instead wrote 20-or-so new poems to be included in a revised extended edition published in 1861. (The banned six poems were later republished in Belgium in 1866 in the collection Les Épaves (Wreckage) with the official French ban on the original edition not lifted until 1949.)
Some still have the power to shock, like Baudelaire’s description of sex with a vampire: “When she had drained the marrow out of all my bones/When I turned listlessly amid my languid moans/To give a kiss of love, no thing was with me but/A greasy leather flask that overflowed with pus!
Baudelaire seemed unable to comprehend the controversy his publication had aroused: "no one, including myself, could suppose that a book imbued with such an evident and ardent spirituality [...] could be made the object of a prosecution, or rather could have given rise to misunderstanding" he wrote. Professor André Guyaux describes how the trial, "was not due to the sudden displeasure of a few magistrates. It was the result of an orchestrated press campaign denouncing a 'sick' book [and even] though Baudelaire achieved rapid fame, all those who refused to acknowledge his genius considered him to be dangerous. And there were quite a few". This trial, and the controversy surrounding it, made Baudelaire a household name in France but it also prevented him from achieving commercial success.
 Les Fleurs du mal  though afforded Baudelaire a degree of notoriety; writers such as Gustave Flaubert and Victor Hugo wrote in praise of the poems. Flaubert wrote to Baudelaire claiming, "You have found a way to inject new life into Romanticism. You are unlike anyone else [which is the most important quality]." Unlike earlier Romantics, Baudelaire looked to the urban life of Paris for inspiration. He argued that art must create beauty from even the most depraved or "non-poetic" situations.
Les Fleurs du mal, with its explicit sexual content and juxtapositions of urban beauty and decay, only added to Baudelaire's reputation as a poéte maudit (cursed poet). Baudelaire enhanced this reputation by flaunting his eccentricities; for instance, he once asked a friend in the middle of a conversation "Wouldn't it be agreeable to take a bath with me?"
However the weight of the trial, his poor living conditions, and a lack of money weighed heavily on Baudelaire and he sunk once more into depression. His physical health was also beginning to seriously decline due to developing complications with syphilis. He started to take a morphine-based tincture (laudanum) which led in turn to an opium dependency.
 Baudelaire composed the series of prose poems known as Paris Spleen between 1855 and his death in 1867. He attached great importance to his work in this then unusual form, asking, “Which one of us, in his moments of ambition, has not dreamed of the miracle of a poetic prose, musical, without rhythm and without rhyme, supple enough and rugged enough to adapt itself to the lyrical impulses of the soul, the undulations of reverie, the jibes of conscience?"
From 1856 onwards, the venereal infection, alcoholic excess and opium addiction were working in an unholy alliance to push Baudelaire down to an early grave.. Things with his family did not improve either. Even after his stepfather's death in April 1857, he and his mother were unable to properly reconcile because of the disgrace she felt at him being publicly denounced as a pornographer.
In the 1860s Baudelaire continued to write articles and essays on a wide range of subjects and figures. He was also publishing prose poems, which were posthumously collected in 1869 as Petits poémes en prose (Little Poems in Prose). By calling these non-metrical compositions poems, Baudelaire was the first poet to make a radical break with the form of verse.
In the last years of his life, Baudelaire fell into a deep depression and once more contemplated suicide. He attempted to improve his state of mind (and earn money) by giving readings and lectures, and in April 1864 he left Paris for an extended stay in Brussels to give a series of lectures,. He had also hoped to persuade a Belgium publisher to print his complete works but his fortunes failed to improve and he was left feeling deeply embittered.
He suffered from several strokes that resulted in partial paralysis.His mother collected her son from Brussels and took him back to Paris where he was admitted to a nursing home.He never left the home and died there the following year on 16 On August 31, 1867, in his mother's arms,at  the age of only forty-six.Although doctors at the time didn't mention it, it is likely that syphilis caused his final illness.  A non-conformist in his maturity, at his death, after more than a year of aphasia, he received the last rites of the Roman Catholic church, and was buried in the family vault in Montparnasse Cemetery.
His  reputation as poet at that time was secure; writers such as Stephane Mallarmé, Paul Verlaine, and Arthur Rimbaud claimed him as a predecessor. Rimbaud called Baudelaire “the king of poets, a true God”. Proust labelled him “the greatest poet of the 19th-century” 
His prose poetry, so rich in metaphor, would also directly inspire the Surrealists with Andre Breton lauding Baudelaire in Le Surréalisme et La Peinture as a champion "of the imagination".
In the 20th century, thinkers and artists as diverse as Jean-Paul Sartre, Robert Lowell and Seamus Heaney have celebrated his work. TS Eliot paid Baudelaire the compliment of stealing the last line of the introduction to Flowers of Evil, Baudelaire’s best-known volume, for The Waste Land: “You! Hypocrite lecteur! – mon semblable, – mon frère!” 
Feted too by the Beats (along with Rimbaud) as the original urban stoned visionary, Baudelaire also became a hero to the singer-lyricists who succeeded them as counterculture stars in the 60s – Leonard Cohen, Bob Dylan, Jim Morrison all drew on him, while Mick Jagger claimed that “Sympathy for the Devil” came from “my Baudelaire books”. His influence continued into the 70s with Patti Smith and John Cooper-Clarke, until punk gave way to ... dandyism, another Baudelairean legacy,
Baudelaire's contribution to the age of modernity was profound.The following excerpt comes from Peter Gay’s book Modernism: The Lure of Heresy:No single poet, no single painter or composer can securely claim to have been the “onlie begetter” of modernism. But the most plausible candidate for that role was Charles Baudelaire. For the history of modernism, he is – along with a chosen few like Marcel Duchamp or Virginia Woolf, Igor Stravinsky or Orson Welles – absolutely indispensable. His original, intensely stimulating art criticism, his candid autobiographical ruminations, his influential translations of Edgar Allan Poe’s dark tales for a French audience, his defiance of accepted boundaries in his deeply personal poetry – above all, that poetry – bear the stamp of a founder. "
As professor André Guyaux observed, he was "obsessed with the idea of modernity [and in fact] gave the word its full meaning". 
But no single figure did more to cement Baudelaire's legend than the influential German philosopher and critic Walter Benjamin whose collected essays on Baudelaire, The Writer of Modern Life,https://www.academia.edu/15562217/_Walter_Benjamin_the_Writer_of_Modern_Life claimed the Frenchman as a new hero of the modern age and positioned him at the very center of the social and cultural history of mid-to-late nineteenth-century Paris. It was Benjamin who transported Baudelaire's flâneur into the twentieth century, figuring him as an essential component of our understandings of modernity, urbanisation and class alienation. Walter Benjamin's essays on the great French lyric poet Charles Baudelaire revolutionized not just the way we think about Baudelaire, but our understanding of modernity and modernism as well. In these essays, Benjamin challenges the image of Baudelaire as late-Romantic dreamer, and evokes instead the modern poet caught in a life-or-death struggle with the forces of the urban commodity capitalism that had emerged in Paris around 1850. The Baudelaire who steps forth from these pages is the flaneur who affixes images as he strolls through mercantile Paris, the ragpicker who collects urban detritus only to turn it into poetry, the modern hero willing to be marked by modern life in its contradictions and paradoxes. He is in every instance the modern artist forced to commodify his literary production: "Baudelaire knew how it stood with the poet: as a flaneur he went to the market; to look it over, as he thought, but in reality to find a buyer." Benjamin reveals Baudelaire as a social poet of the very first rank.
Known for his dark and intriguing observations about life, Baudelaire is as controversial and heralded today as he was in the 19th Century. Charles Baudelaire's influence over poets, writers, and even musicians is a testament both to his talent and the cult of personality that has grown as much out of his lifestyle as is poetry. He is acknowledged as one of the greatest of 19th-century French poets,a continuing source of literary bent hedonists everywhere, me included. I will leave you with some words from him,not much darkness, but much, much beauty, hope you enjoy as much as I do.

Be Drunk - Charles Baudelaire
 
You have to be always drunk. That's all there is to it--it's the
only way. So as not to feel the horrible burden of time that breaks
your back and bends you to the earth, you have to be continually
drunk.
But on what?Wine, poetry or virtue, as you wish. But be
drunk.
And if sometimes, on the steps of a palace or the green grass of
a ditch, in the mournful solitude of your room, you wake again,
drunkenness already diminishing or gone, ask the wind, the wave,
the star, the bird, the clock, everything that is flying, everything
that is groaning, everything that is rolling, everything that is
singing, everything that is speaking. . .ask what time it is and
wind, wave, star, bird, clock will answer you:"It is time to be
drunk! So as not to be the martyred slaves of time, be drunk, be
continually drunk! On wine, on poetry or on virtue as you wish." 
 
 Hymn to Beauty- Charles Baudelaire
 
Oh Beauty! dost thou generate from Heaven or from Hell?
Within thy glance, so diabolic and divine,
Confusedly both wickedness and goodness dwell,
And hence one might compare thee unto sparkling wine.
 
Thy look containeth both the dawn and sunset stars,
Thy perfumes, as upon a sultry night exhale,
Thy kiss a philter, and thy mouth a Grecian vase,
That renders heroes cowardly and infants hale.
 
Yea, art thou from the planets, or the fiery womb?
The demon follows in thy train, with magic fraught,
Thou scatter'st seeds haphazardly of joy and doom,
Thou govern'st everything, but answer'st unto nought.
 
O Loveliness! thou spurnest corpses with delight,
Among thy jewels, Horror hath such charms for thee,
And Murder 'mid thy mostly cherished trinklets bright,
Upon thy massive bosom dances amorously.
 
Tthe blinded, fluttering moth towards the candle flies,
Then frizzles, falls, and falters—"Blessings unto thee"
The panting swain that o'er his beauteous mistress sighs,
Seems like the Sick, that stroke their gravestones lovingly.
 
What matter, if thou comest from the Heavens or Hell,
O Beauty, frightful ghoul, ingenuous and obscure!
So long thine eyes, thy smile, to me the way can tell
Towards that Infinite I love, but never saw.
 
From God or Satan? Angel, Mermaid, Proserpine?
What matter if thou makest—blithe, voluptuous sprite—
With rhythms, perfumes, visions—O mine only queen!—
The universe less hideous and the hours less trite. 
 
Evening Harmony - Charles Baudelaire
 
The hour has come at last when, trembling to and fro,
Each flower is a censer sifting its perfume;
The scent and sounds all swirl in evening’s gentle fume;
A melancholy waltz, a languid vertigo!

Each flower is a censer sifting its perfume;
A violin’s vibrato wounds the heart of woe;
A melancholy waltz, a languid vertigo!
The sky, a lofty altar, lovely in the gloom,

A violin’s vibrato wounds the heart of woe,
A tender heart detests the black of nullity,
The sky, a lofty altar, lovely in the gloom;
The sun is drowning in the evening’s blood-red glow.

A tender heart detests the black of nullity,
And lovingly preserves each trace of long ago!
The sun is drowning in the evening’s blood-red glow …
Your memory shines through me like an ostensory!

  "Hymn to Beauty" is reprinted from The Flowers of Evil. Charles Baudelaire. London: Elkin Mathews, 1909.
 
Hymn - Charles Baudelaire 
 
 To the too-dear, to the too-beautiful,
who fills my heart with clarity,
to the angel, to the immortal idol,
All hail, in immortality!
She flows through my reality,
air, mixed with the salt sea-swell:
into my soul's ecstasy,
pours the essence of the eternal;
Ever-fresh sachet, that scents
the dear corner's atmospheric light,
hidden smoke, of the burning censer,
in the secret paths of night.
How, incorruptible love,
to express your endless verities?
Grain of musk, unseen, above,
in the depths of my infinities!
To the too-dear, to the too-beautiful,
who is my joy and sanity,
to the angel, to the immortal idol,
All hail in immortality!
 
Lover's Wine - Charles Baudelaire
 
Today Space is fine!
Like a horse mount this wine,
without bridle, spurs, bit,
for a heaven divine!
We, two angels they torture
with merciless fever,
will this mirage pursue
in the day's crystal blue!
Sweetly balanced, fly higher
through the whirlwind's wise air
in our mirrored desire,
my sister, swim there
without rest or respite
to my dream paradise!
 
The Sunset of Romanticism
 
 How beautiful a new sun is when it rises,
flashing out its greeting, like an explosion!
- Happy, whoever hails with sweet emotion
its descent, nobler than a dream, to our eyes!
I remember! I've seen all, flower, furrow, fountain,
swoon beneath its look, like a throbbing heart…
- Let's run quickly, it's late, towards the horizon,
to catch at least one slanting ray as it departs!
But I pursue the vanishing God in vain:
irresistible Night establishes its sway,
full of shudders, black, dismal, cold:
an odour of the tomb floats in the shadow,
at the swamp's edge, feet faltering I go,
bruising damp slugs, and unexpected toads.
 
“The Poet is a kinsman in the clouds 
Who scoffs at archers, loves a stormy day; 
But on the ground, among the hooting crowds, 
He cannot walk, his wings are in the way" -  Charles Baudelare

 A book is a garden, an orchard, a storehouse, a party, a company by the way, a counselor, a multitude of counselors.”- Charles Baudelaire. 

“Always be a poet, even in prose.”- Charles Baudelaire.

“Let us beware of common folk, of common sense, of sentiment, of inspiration, and of the obvious.”
- Charles Baudelaire.

Thursday, 7 April 2022

Why (The King Of Love Is Dead) — Nina Simone

 

 
After her performance at the Selma to Montgomery March, American singer, songwriter, pianist, arranger, and civil rights activist  Nina Simone had met Martin Luther King onstage. Their exchange highlighted the fundamental difference between the pair’s outlook on the Civil Rights movement: "˜I’m not nonviolent!’, she greeted the doctor, referring to King’s policy of peaceful protest and resistance. She admired King, nonetheless, and on this day in 1968 three days after the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.https://teifidancer-teifidancer.blogspot.com/2021/01/honoring-rich-radical-legacy-of-martin.html was assassinated Simone and her band played at the Westbury Music Festival on Long Island, N.Y and used her concert to stage an act of collective mourning and outrage.  They performed the haunting "Why? (The King of Love is Dead)," a song they had just learned, written by their bass player Gene Taylor less than 24 hours after King's death in response to the shocking event. This debut performance lasted around 15 minutes and seemed to encapsulate the feelings of sadness and loss everyone felt around this time.
As Simone says at the outset, the band had had just one day to learn it and the performance subsequently seems to veer between the rehearsed and the improvised. ‘Why?’ has made various appearances on record and CD, initially appearing in edited form on Simone's live album ‘Nuff Said (1968) recorded with violence erupting in more than 100 cities in outrage at King’s assassination  but fueled by longstanding social inequity and discrimination. and later being partially restored to its original version as part of the “Martin Luther King Suite” on the compilations Saga of the Good Life and Hard Times and Sugar in My Bowl. 
The song is enraged, heart wrenching, and catchy. Simone’s voice soars as she sings, “Turn the other cheek he’d plead/ Love thy neighbor was his creed/ Pain humiliation death he did not dread/ With his Bible by his side/ From his foes he did not hide/ It’s hard to think that this great man is dead.” The song managed to sum up the mood of bitterness and despair that had descended on the nation, and remains . a powerful moving eulogy to Martin Luther King. Simone’s music increased attention to racial oppression and also encouraged civil rights activists to keep fighting for freedom that continues to this day.

Why (The King Of Love Is Dead) — Nina Simone

Once upon this planet Earth,
Lived a man of humble birth,
Preaching love and freedom
For his fellow man.

He was dreaming of the day
Peace would come to Earth to stay,
And he spread this message
All across the land.

 “Turn the other cheek,” he’d plead.
“Love thy neighbor,” was his creed.
Pain, humiliation, death he did not dread.
With his bible at his side,
From his foes he did not hide.
It’s hard to think that this great man is dead.

Will the murders never cease?
Are they men or are they beasts?
What do they ever hope to gain?
Will my country stand or fall?
Is it too late for us all?
And did Martin Luther King just die in vain?

But he had seen the mountaintop,
And he knew he could not stop,
Always living with the threat of death ahead.
Folks you’d better stop and think,
Everybody knows we’re on the brink.
What will happen, now that he is dead?

He was for equality,
For all people, you and me,
Full of love and goodwill,
Hate was not his way.
He was not a violent man,
Tell me folks if you can?
Just why, why was he shot down the other day?

But he had seen the mountaintop,
And he knew he could not stop.
Always living with the threat of death ahead.
Folks you’d better stop and think, and feel again
Cause we headed for the brink,
What will happen, now that the King of love is dead?

Wednesday, 6 April 2022

Broken Britain


Losing control, my temper is boiling
These seas of thought overwhelming,
Failed by politicians, tormented by their policies
Cancer treatment in crisis, NHS on its knees,
Cost of living keeps on rising, 8% inflation
People hungry pushed to the edge of desperation
The system has for far too long been corrupted
By forces out of control that are morally bankrupted,
Goodwill being eradicated, comfort zones aggravated
Hope left sedated, leaving so many frustrated, 
The milk of human kindness slowly sucked dry
Tears falling faster, the land left in disarray,
Above us the grey skies keep on dawning
Rivulets of despair, inequality spawning,
Corruption rife, economy in ruins
A cabal of filth, looting billions,
Vile Prime Minister pulling faces and gurning
While others left empty with hearts burning, 
We must untangle ourselves from the nets cast
Swim away from currents of confusion fast,
Find waves of tranquility and peace to restore
So that this broken, rotten system is no more,
Try to overcome the flowing, churning sadness
Prevent further drift into the turmoil of abyss,
Rise in a new society formed beyond the wreckage
With kisses that heal and forever salvage.

Sunday, 3 April 2022

Shellshocked!


We have the biggest decline in living standards since records began  in 1956, and the highest tax burden since the 1940''s . Surging fuel and food prices Inflation approaching the highest  rate in 30 years. Think tanks that have revealed that around 1.3 million will be pushed into absolute poverty.
But meanwhile Transport Secretary Grant  Shapps has had the audacity  to suggest  the way poverty is presented can be 'somewhat misleading' when put to him that rising bills could push 400,000 more children into poverty as the Chancellor refused to raise benefits - which will rise at less than half inflation.Speaking on Sky News' Ridge on Sunday programme this morning  Shapps admitted that rising costs of living are "very substantial", but questioned estimates of how many people could be plunged into severe difficulty.  "I don't want to sort of get us lost in numbers here, but poverty is divided into both absolute and relative (poverty), and sometimes the way it's presented can be somewhat misleading to say the least,
 
 
Grant Shapps has surpassed himself by making such  inappropriate and insulting comments. It seems he is more concerned with playing down the figures, rather than expressing the slightest concern for cold, hungry children and how they will  actually help people. It  appears that Grant Shapps when not masquerading as multi millionare marketer Michael Green  is in total denial about the level of poverty in this country. Like the rest of the Tory's  has absolutely no idea what is happening out there. They are deluded and entitled. This crisis will only get worse and they do nothing. Compared to Richie-Rich Sunak ad Shapps we are all impoverished.Even before the pandemic, around 4 million children were living in poverty across the UK, the charity Action for Children have noted, with their Director of policy, Imran Hussein. saying "The government is in denial over child poverty which continues to rise and threatens to torpedo its lagshop plans or lvelling up."
Anyway, the distinction between absolute poverty and relative poverty is probably an academic classification created by a group wanting to justify poverty. If you can't afford to eat or heat - that's fucking poverty in the 7th richest Economy in the World and at the end of the day in a civilised society no one should be in relative poverty.
The money is available to save people from hunger, the cold, the poverty, and the despair people are facing, it would only take a few keystrokes on a Bank of England kyboard to create it instantly. So why won't the government do it?
Well in 2019 the UN Special Rapporteur on Poverty Philip Alston in his damning condemnation of the Tory Party's callous approach to poverty stricken UK citizens stated that when faced with the facts Tory ministers just reverted to denial & manipulating the figures. It seems nothing has changed.
Be prepared for every Tory to now trot out the absolute/relative poverty line. It’s almost like they attend ‘Lie Class’ every morning and establish a new catchphrase for that week. Think they’re taking bets, behind toilet doors, as to who can use it the most.