Sunday, 9 October 2022

Poem For Kate Clark-Winnell (15/11/1958 - 2/10/2022) RIP- Until We Meet Again

 

 
You came into my life 
In shimmering grace,
A wealth of wisdom
With warmth unbounded,
Pumped through a vessel 
Of pure indiscriminate love,.
Showering me with jewels 
Of epiphanous magic.
 
With candle uncaged
It's time for your flight,
I'm easing my grip
Letting you go,
My tears fall 
Your head touches the sky,
Your feet disappear 
As I whisper Goodbye.
 
When the time comes
I will tread the same path,
Our connection eternal 
So hold out your hand, 
As we dance with the stars,
Laugh at the moon 
Throw stardust in the ocean
Smile at the sun.

Saturday, 8 October 2022

John Cowper Powys ( 8 October 1872 - 17 June 1963 ) - A Complex Wonderful Vision



John Cowper Powys novelist, poet and philosopher was born on 8 October 1872 at Shirley Vicarage in Derbyshire, the eldest of eleven children born to the Rev. Charles Francis Powys (1843–1923) and Mary Cowper Powys (1849–1914). A brief biography of John Cowper Powys can hardly be ‘brief’.
His father's ancestry can be traced back some six centuries to Powyses of Montgomery, and to, more recently, the first Sir Thomas Powys of Lilford (died 1719). From his mother, Mary Cowper-Johnson, he derived the more literary blood of the poets John Donne and William Cowper. He came from a family of eleven children, many of whom were also talented. His two younger brothers Llewelyn Powys (1884–1939) and Theodore Francis Powys were well-known writers, while his sister Philippa published a novel and some poetry. Another sister Marian Powys was an authority on lace and lace-making and published a book on this subject. His brother A. R. Powys, was Secretary of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, and published a number of books on architectural subjects. 
Like his father and brothers, he was educated at the ancient and prestigious Sherborne School in Dorset, where he succeeded in keeping bullies at bay by aggressively playing the fool, a skill he honed by practicing on his younger brothers. After Sherborne, still in the family footsteps, he went to Corpus Christi College at Cambridge University. There he associated with few, bar one or two fellow misfits; he kept a revolver in his rooms as a deterrent to excessive socializing. 
After graduating with a second-class degree in History, on 6 April 1896 he married Margaret Lyon. They had a son, Littleton Alfred, in 1902. The marriage was though unsatisfactory and Powys eventually lived a large part of each year in the USA and had relationships with various women. In 1921 he met Phyllis Playter the twenty-six year old daughter of industrialist and business man Franklin Playter. Eventually they established a permanent relationship, though he was unable to divorce his wife Margaret, who was a Catholic. However, he diligently supported Margaret and the education of their son.  Margaret Powys died in 1947, and his son Littleton Alfred in 1954.
Powys's first employment was teaching at several girls' schools at Hove, Sussex.  He then worked as an Extension lecturer throughout England, for both Oxford and Cambridge Universities. Then in 1905 he began lecturing in the USA for The American Society for the Extension of University Teaching. He worked as an itinerant lecturer until the early 1930s, gaining a reputation as a charismatic speaker. However, he usually spent the Summer in England. During this time he travelled the length and breadth of the USA, as well as into Canada. He engaged in public debate with the philosopher Bertrand Russell on marriage, as well as with the philosopher and historian Will Durant; he was also a witness in the obscenity trial of James Joyce's novel, Ulysses..
He met a great variety of people: Charlie Chaplin, Emma Goldman, Paul Robeson, the dancer Isadora Duncan, Theodore Dreiser who became a close friend. But also humble folk: the black porters on the trains, the farmer next door or the poor immigrants who came to his lectures to improve their education.
His first published works were  Odes and other Poems (1896) and Poems (1899).In the summer of 1905 Powys composed "The Death of God" an epic poem modelled on the blank verse of Milton, Keats, and Tennyson that was published as Lucifer in 1956. There was then a gap in publications due to his lecturing commitments, but from 1916 onwards his essays, criticism and philosophical works appeared at regular intervals.No prodigy, Powys had published his first novel, Wood and Stone,dedicated to Thomas Hardy, at 43 in 1915, and four more had followed. All sank into the swamp of critical indifference. A collection of literary essays Visions and Revisions in 1915 and his first full length work of popular philosophy, A Complex Vision, in 1920.
 As an author, Powys was inspired by many other authors including George Eliot, Dostoyevsky and Rabelais.He first came to wide public prominence for four books published between 1929 and 1936, collectively called The Wessex Novels after their geographic setting in England’s South West. The name also alludes to Thomas Hardy, a major influence on Powys.
It was with Wolf Solent,the first of his Wessex novels, written when he was 57 and still making a part-time living from his mobile lecture show the first of his Wessex novels  that Powys achieved any real critical, and financial success. This novel was reprinted several times in both the USA and Britain and translated into German in 1930 and French in 1931. In the Preface he wrote for the 1961 Macdonald edition of the novel Powys states: "Wolf Solent is a book of Nostalgia, written in a foreign country with the pen of a traveller and the ink-blood of his home". Wolf Solent is set in Ramsgard, based on Sherborne, Dorset, where Powys attended school  as well as Blacksod, modelled on Yeovil, Somerset, and Dorchester and Weymouth, both in Dorset, all places full of memories for him. In the same year The Meaning of Culture was published and it, too, was frequently reprinted. In Defence of Sensuality, published at the end of the following year, was yet another best seller. First published in 1933, A Philosophy of Solitude was another best seller for Powys in the USA.
A Glastonbury Romance, one of Powys’s most admired novels, published in 1932, also sold well. According to Powys this novel's "heroine is the Grail", and its central concern is with the various myths, legends and history associated with Glastonbury. Not only is A Glastonbury Romance concerned with the legend that Joseph of Arimathea brought the Grail, a vessel containing the blood of Christ, to the town, but the further tradition that King Arthur was buried there. In addition, one of the novel's main characters, the Welshman Owen Evans, introduces the idea that the Grail has a Welsh (Celtic), pagan, pre-Christian origin. The main sources for Powys's ideas on mythology and the Grail legend are Sir John Rhys's Studies in the Arthurian Legend, R. S. Loomis's Celtic Myth and Arthurian Romance, and the works of Jessie L. Weston, including From Ritual to Romance. T. S. Eliot's The Wasteland is another possible influence. A central aspect of A Glastonbury Romance is the attempt by John Geard, ex-minister now the mayor of Glastonbury, to restore Glastonbury to its medieval glory as a place of religious pilgrimage. On the other hand, the Glastonbury industrialist Philip Crow, along with John and Mary Crow and Tom Barter, who are, like him, from Norfolk, view the myths and legends of the town with contempt. Philip's vision is of a future with more mines and more factories. John Crow, however, as he is penniless, takes on the task of organising a pageant for Geard. At the same time an alliance of Anarchists, Marxists, and Jacobins try to turn Glastonbury into a commune.
Another important work, Autobiography, was published in 1934, in which he describes his first 60 years. While he sets out to be totally frank about himself, and especially his sexual peculiarities and perversions, he largely excludes any substantial discussion of the women in his life. The reason for this is now much clearer because we now know that it was written while he was still married to Margaret, though he was living in a permanent relationship with Phyllis Playter.
Powys openly admits, again and again, in his autobiography, in letters and, by implication, in his fiction, that he found the notion and practice of normal penetrative sexual intercourse deeply repugnant, and could not understand how his brother Llewellyn could go in for that kind of thing. ("I have a horror of 'fucking' as it is called" was one of his many comments on this matter.) He insists that he is not a "homosexualist", though he has no objection to those who are. He liked girls of the demi-monde, and prostitutes, and slim young women in men's clothing.
His notions of sexual satisfaction centred around masturbation, voyeurism and fondling. He liked girls to sit on his knee, and he also got sexual satisfaction from reciting poetry at them. The comic aspect of this was apparent to him, and it bothered him not at all. There is a grandeur in his indifference to the norm. His appetite for food was as unusual as his appetite for sex: he became, nominally, a vegetarian, but eschewed most vegetables, surviving for years, he claimed, on a diet of eggs, bread and milk, with occasional treats of guava jelly. This gave him severe gastric trouble, and he had to endure a painful form of surgery that he labels "gasterenterostomy". In his later years, he depended for bowel function entirely on enemas, a procedure of which he highly approved, as it facilitated meditation.
We would not have known about all of this if he had not told us about it, but he recites his woes with such relish that his prose becomes charged with rapture. During a sojourn in hospital he says that he invented the trick of concentrating on variously coloured angels - "purple ones let us say ... vermeil-tinctured ones perhaps" - which he would direct towards his fellow sufferers, and "in this way, as I lay in the great White Ship of Suffering, I felt that I was not altogether wasting my time". Convalescing in his garden at home, he at last found relief in vomiting a "whole bucketful - forgive me, dear reader! - of the foulest excremental stuff possible to be conceived ... of a dusky sepia tint, a colour I had not so far hit upon for any of my tutelary angels". Reality, in his own phrase, lies "between the urinal and the stars".
It is one of his most important works and writer J. B. Priestley suggests that, even if Powys had not written a single novel, "this one book alone would have proved him to be a writer of genius." By his own admission, John Cowper Powys was mentally abnormal. His eccentricity showed itself most clearly in his relationship with the natural world: for him everything in nature pulsated with life,not only plants and animals but rivers, rocks, clouds. He found ecstasy in landscapes and a sublime significance in the smallest twig. And he believed that his sensitivity to the life force of inanimate objects gave him access to a larger cosmic meaning, one that connected humans with their environment and filled the universe with rapturous energy. In short, Powys was not your average man. There are not many geniuses in the literary canon, but one can argue fairly that Powys is among them.
The memoirs of Casanova and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were his models, and Powys rivals them in his sometimes hilarious descriptions of his own follies. These outbursts of frankness are intended to distract from his evasions, his inconsistency, and emotional intensity. But as we read further, and encounter prostitutes, fishermen, priests, ticket collectors, publishers, poets, and all the hoi polloi from a thousand railway journeys and lecture halls and bars and ocean voyages, we begin to appreciate the underlying generosity and life-democracy (to coin a Powysian term) of this book and its author. We are never manipulated toward a social or political message. Powys sees relationships as meetings of solitudes; he has no interest in social hierarchies, politics, worldliness, or ambition. He never moralizes about sex. And he has no time for religions and creeds that lack aesthetic qualities; to him, religion is art, or it is nothing.
In 1929 Powys and Phyllis  had moved from Greenwich Village in New York City to rural, upstate New York. Then in June 1934 John Cowper Powys and Phyllis Playter left America and moved to England, living first in Dorchester, 
Weymouth Sands ( 1934 ) the third of his so-called Wessex novels was a celebration of the seaside town Jack had loved as a child, but its tone is far from innocent. The novel features a sinister clown figure and Punch and Judy shows: Powys was not one to shy away from the suggestions of violence and child sex abuse that are now routinely associated with such entertainments.
He moved to Corwen, Denbighshire North Wales, in July 1935, with the help of the novelist James Hanley, who lived nearby. Corwen was historically part of Edeirnion or Edeyrnion and an ancient commote of medieval Wales, once a part of the Kingdom of Powys, Here Powys immersed himself in Welsh literature, mythology and culture, including learning to read Welsh. Here he could also satisfy his lifelong mystical delight in landscape and country walking.
The move inspired two major novels with Welsh settings, Owen Glendower [1941] and Porius (1951). They are considered to be his greatest masterpieces. It is not surprising that John Cowper Powys should, after he moved to Corwen, decide to begin a novel about legendary national hero, Welsh Prince Owen Glendower (A.D.1400–16),who, like King Arthur, will one day come again.  because it was in Corwen that Owen's rebellion against Henry IV began on 16 September 1400, when he formally assumed the ancestral title of Prince of Powys at his manor house of Glyndyfrdwy, then in the parish of Corwen.
An important aspect of Owen Glendower are historical parallels between the beginning of the fifteenth century and the late 1930s and early 1940s: "A sense of contemporataneousness is ever present in Owen Glendower. We are in a world of change like our own". The novel was conceived at a time when the Spanish Civil War was a major topic of public debate and completed on 24 December 1939, a few months after World War II had begun. 
While Porius takes place in the same  time of the mythic King Arthur,  set in October in 499 AD, it is more like a mountain landscape or an epic poem than a novel. Its characters include King Arthur, a Pelagian monk, a Roman matron, a Jewish doctor, the shape-shifting Myrddin Wyllt (otherwise known as Merlin), the bard Taliessin and a family of completely convincing aboriginal giants, who live on the slopes of Snowdon. We also meet the Three Aunties, grey-haired princess survivors of the old race. In this twilight of the gods, the cult of Mithras, the old faith of the Druids, the fading power of Rome and the rising force of Christianity do battle for a week beneath a waxing moon, while Powys's characters intermittently find time to reflect on past times, and congratulate themselves on being so modern.
In both works, but especially Porius, Powys makes use of the mythology found in the Welsh classic The Mabinogion. Porius is, for some, the crowning achievement of Powys's maturity, but others are repelled by its obscurity. It was originally severely cut for publication, but in recent years two attempts have been made to recreate Powys's original intent.
Cowper Powys is a somewhat controversial writer who evokes both massive contempt and near idolatry. His work is marked by depth of ideas, and for their massive sized and much complexity of character but with much humor. In addition to their scope Powys’ books can be difficult because of their many obscure references to Welsh culture and mythology. Other sources of difficulty for the contemporary reader are Powys’ obsession with the occult and an animist world view which, among other things, endowed inanimate objects like the sun in A Glastonbury Romance with souls and points of view.The realm of John Cowper Powys is dangerous. The reader may wander for years in this parallel universe, entrapped and bewitched, and never reach its end. There is always another book to discover, another work to reread. Like Tolkien, Powys has invented another country, densely peopled, thickly forested, mountainous, erudite, strangely self-sufficient. This country is less visited than Tolkien's, but it is as compelling, and it has more air. 
The appeal of Powys eludes some readers, while others are deeply moved. Reading a novel by John Cowper Powys requires stamina, but is well worth it because they offer great rewards. And though his challenging works have never been fashionable,  they have won a loyal following nevertheless, and what is noteworthy is that throughout his career he consistently gained the admiration of novelists as diverse as Theodore Dreiser, Henry Miller, Iris Murdoch, Margaret Drabble, and James Purdy, as well as the academic critics George Painter, G. Wilson Knight, George Steiner, Harald Fawkner, and Jerome McGann.. 
Powys was also one of the twentieth century’s greatest literary letter writers: his correspondence bears comparison with that of Charles Olson in its immediacy and intellectual scope. A collection of his letters to his lifelong friend and biographer Louis Wilkinson (himself best known for his close connection with Aleister Crowley) was published during his lifetime: further volumes have been issued posthumously.
More minor in scale, the novels that followed Porius are characterized by an element of fantasy. The Inmates (1952) is set in a madhouse and explores Powys's interest in mental illness. But it is a work on which Powys failed to bestow sufficient "time and care". Glen Cavaliero, in John Cowper Powys: Novelist, describes the novels written after Porius as "the spontaneous fairy tales of Rabelaisian surrealist enchanted with life", and finds Atlantis (1954) "the richest and most sustained" of them. Atlantis is set in the Homeric world and the protagonist is Nisos the young son of Odysseus who plans to voyage west from Ithaca over the drowned Atlantis. Powys final fiction, such as Up and Out (1957) and All or Nothing (1960) "use the mode of science fiction, although science has no part in them".
He and Phyllis  later moved, a final time, in May 1955, to Blaenau Ffestiniog in North Wales. He corresponded with many distinguished Welshmen of letters;and his non-fictional writings about Wales and the Welsh were collected in Obstinate Cymric (1947).
A convert to anarchism, he strongly supported the anarchist side in the Spanish Revolution and corresponded with Emma  Goldman whom he referred to as his “chief Political Philosopher
Here is a  letter to his sister (24 September 1938), published in The Letters of John Cowper Powys to Philippa Powys (1996), edited by Anthony Head :„I have been reading of late, most carefully, oh such an exciting mass of Anarchist Literature sent to me by old Emma Goldman who is my Prime Minister & chief Political Philosopher! and every week I get the anarchist paper from Avenue A New York City and also the ‘Bulletin of Information’ from the Anarchists of Barcelona. This latter pamphlet I am carefully keeping; because it is not so much concerned with the war as with their experiment in Catalonia of organizing their life on Anarchist lines and getting rid of all Dictatorship & of the ‘Sovereign State’.“

Source: https://quotepark.com/quotes/1784075-john-cowper-powys-i-have-been-reading-of-late-most-carefully-oh-su/

Source: https://quotepark.com/authors/john-cowper-powys/
Letter to his sister (24 September 1938), published in The Letters of John Cowper Powys to Philippa Powys (1996), edited by Anthony Head p. 106

Source: https://quotepark.com/authors/john-cowper-powys/
 Powys wrote of having forged his own worldview in reaction to capitalist society: “I would convert my malicious hatred of the commercial hurly-burly into a passionate eulogy of the saints and mystics of the past”.
He professed to having a mania “for every sort of metaphysical system”,  wrote of “the organic link that binds together the human generations”and thirsted for a current of thinking “that, in its historic continuity, links the religion of the cave-man with the religion of the philosopher”.
Powys often expressed his disdain for what he termed “the various mechanical inventions of our western world”.
He wrote: “There is no escape from machinery and modern inventions; no escape from city-vulgarity and money-power, no escape from the dictatorship of the uncultured
 “Money and machines between them dominate the civilized world. Between them, the power of money and the power of the machine have distracted the minds of our western nations from those eternal aspects of life and nature the contemplation of which engenders all noble and subtle thoughts”. His critique of modernity went further than a dislike for the physical mechanisms of its society and embraced its cultural essence.
In common with the likes of Ruskin,William Morris,Herbert Read and Henry Miller, Powys felt a profound aesthetic loathing for the base culture of contemporary commercial society and the “crudest superficiality” which prevailed there.
 Powys was at heart a primitivist, for whom virtually every modern invention was anathema. In Wolf Solent he referred to airplanes as "spying down upon every retreat like ubiquitous vultures." He never drove a car and never used a typewriter. He thought television was pernicious. He didn't like talking on the telephone, because he didn't want his words violated by a tangle of wires.He was suspicious of science, which man has the means to use wrongly. He fought all his life against the practice of vivisection, “a wickedness” which, as he said, “contradicts and cancels the one single advantage that our race has got from what is called evolution, namely the development of our sense of right and wrong” (Powys, Autobiography, 639).
A passionate and clear-sighted ecologist, long before our times, he was deeply conscious that there is a necessary link, a mysterious and compelling harmony to respect between a blade of grass, the humblest insect, man and the cosmos, which entails that we respect life under all its forms. 
"A really lonely spirit can gradually come to feel itself just as much a plant, a tree, a sea-gull, a whale, a badger, a woodchuck, a goblin, an elf, a rhinoceros, a demigod, a moss-covered rock, a planetary demiurge, as a man or a woman. Such a spirit can gaze at the great sun, as he shines through the morning mist, and feel itself to be one magnetic Power contemplating another magnetic Power. Such a spirit can stand on the edge of the vast sea and feel within itself a turbulence and a calm that belong to an æon of time far earlier than the first appearance of man upon earth. It is only out of the depths of an absolute loneliness that a man can strip away all the problematical ideals of his race and all the idols of his human ambitions, and look dispassionately about him, saying to himself, “Here am I, an ichthyosaurus-ego, with atavistic reminiscences that go back to the vegetable-world and the rock-world, and with prophetic premonitions in me that go forward to the super-men of the future!” (Powys, In Defence of Sensuality, 100) 
For Powys the greatest achievement possible is to feel an “unearthly exultation”, an ecstatic state, provoked by a deep and willed mental concentration. In these moments of ecstasy our vision becomes the “eternal vision”. He had one rule in his life and never tired of repeating it in his books: “Enjoy, defy, forget!
Powys, was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1958, 1959 and 1962.In 1958, he was awarded the plaque of the Hamburg Free Academy of Arts  in recognition of his outstanding services to literature and philosophy.Then on 23 July 1962, Powys, who was 90, was awarded the honorary degree of Doctor of Letters in absentia, by the University of Wales at Swansea, where he was described as "patriarch of the literature of these islands"
Throughout his life, Powys never willingly compromised: he saw several of his novels published with huge chunks of text removed and their overall impact accordingly reduced, but the manuscripts as he wrote them never offered anything less than the all-encompassing world he envisioned. This insistence on his own style contributed to the incomprehension that frequently met his work, but it also produced unparalleled literary achievements. 
The world as seen by Powys is his own. It was painfully won out of his battles with his own complex, protean personality, and its varied layers of manias, fears, frustrations, strange obsessions, his challenge to fate and to the Deity he named “the First Cause”. Powys is not a ‘literary’ author, he is not concerned with formal perfection. He was a writer by inner necessity and therefore never attached much importance to his style, which can sometimes be extravagant, he never considered himself an ‘artist’. Throughout his novels, the oblique effects of the action count more than the action itself. Great importance is given to mental states, to thoughts going on inside the minds of the characters, more than to their actions. He is intent on recording everything related to each of them, their sensations, their habits, their obsessions, even some irrelevant thought, such as we all sometimes have. The reader is never sure how the characters are going to evolve. Powys had a rare openness of mind and showed far more advanced ideas than D.H. Lawrence, to take a famous example, in matters of sexuality. He describes its shades and complexities, its ambiguities. Except for sadism which Powys hates and condemns, he included homosexuality, onanism, fetishism and incest in his novels. He wrote that “no religion that doesn’t deal with sex-longing in some kind of way is much use to us” 
 As he became older, he got into the habit of praying to many different gods, to the Earth-Spirit, to the spirits inhabiting woods, trees, rocks. Describing his rituals in Autobiography, he writes that he had “a mania for endowing every form of the Inanimate with life, and then worshipping it as some kind of a little god” (Powys, Autobiography 629). He held special worship for trees and recommends, when we feel weary, to embrace one with our arms around it, for then: “you can transfer by a touch to its earth-bound trunk all your most neurotic troubles! These troubles of yours the tree accepts, and absorbs them into its own magnetic life; so that henceforth they lose their devilish power of tormenting you” (Powys, Autobiography 650) 
In 1955 John and Phyllis moved to a tiny house in the slate-quarrying town of Blaenau Ffestiniog, high in the mountains of Snowdonia. John was living mainly on raw eggs and two bottles of milk a day. He worked on what he called a Freudian paraphrase of the Iliad and various short works that Richard Perceval Graves, the Powys brothers’ biographer, called bizarre fantasies. He grew gradually weaker, stopped writing and died quietly in the local hospital, aged 90. He was cremated and his ashes were scattered according to his wishes in the sea at Chesil Beach in Dorset. 
Though sadly neglected,and with  few of his books currently in print. he remains nevertheless one of the giants of twentieth century British Literature. long has his rich imagination stirred me, and  left a deep impression.There is a spell that weaves its magic in the pages of Powys’s words and contained within his novels, that continues to be cast to this day. Revealing a mystical sense of history and a complex but wonderful vision that combined a philosophy of defiance of the pressures of the modern world that was in tune with mother nature. that is more important than ever. 
Numerous books, by, or about Powys, can be read online at "John Cowper Powys" Internet Archive  and his memory is kept live by the Powys Society https://powys-society.org/ To mark the 150th anniversary of his birth, in the following programme Matthew Sweet discusses his life and writing with Margaret Drabble, John Gray, Iain Sinclair and Kevan Mainwaring.

Wood and Stones -  John Cowper Powys

THE silent trees above my head
The silent pathway at my feet
Shame me when here I dare to tread
Accompanied by thoughts unmeet.

"Alas!" they seem to say " have we
In speechless patience travailed long
Only at last to bring forth thee,
A creature void of speech or song ?

"Only in thee can Nature know
Herself, find utterance and a tongue
To tell her rapture and her woe,
And yet of her thou hast not sung.

Thy mind with trivial notions rife
Beholds the pomp of night and day,
The winds and clouds and seas at strife,
Uncaring, and hath naught to say."

O Man, with destiny so great,
With years so few to make it good,
Such fooling in the eyes of fate
May well give speech to stones and wood!


Friday, 7 October 2022

Gasping

The streets are alive 
With the stench of death, 
As day-to day life 
One round of uncertainty,
Many hanging by a thread
Others dying in penury. 
 
A tory vote 
Gives power to the oppressors,
Involuntary servitude
Permeates the air, 
They don't feel your pain 
You are a mere statistic. 
 
Today's  predicament
Is yesterdays corollary, 
Based on a premise
Of deceit and lies,
No intention to deliver
No standards to uphold.
 
Forcing financial violence
Upon desperate people,
Expected to remain submissive
Under sociopathic tendency,
Increasingly endangering society
With poverty and inequality. 
 
The tables need turning
The faceless to be seen,
Open the floodgates 
Of sense and reason,
To overcome the barriers
Of a cruel depraved regime.
 
 

Tuesday, 4 October 2022

Pierre Chrétien De Geyter Belgian socialist and composer of the revolutionary anthem, L'Internationale (October 4 1848 – 26 September 1932)


Pierre Chrétien De Geyter  Belgian socialist and composer, best known for writing the music of the revolutionary Internationale Socialist anthem The Internationale,was born 4th October 1848 on Kanunnik Street in Ghent, Belgium.
The living conditions of the Ghent working-class family in which Pierre De Geyter was born were far from rosy. Poverty, hunger, overpopulation and contagious diseases took their toll in the Flemish proletarian neighbourhoods in the middle of the 19th century. When to compound, the disastrous state of affairs the Flemish textile and metal industry was hit by crisis because of rapid industrial development, many breadwinners lost their job. Longing for better economic circumstances the De Geyter family, like many other Flemish textile workers, moved in 1855 to the North of France, which in that period was also known as ‘Petit Belgique’.
Both father and son found work there, despite child labour being outlawed since 1841. Pierre became a thread maker at Fives Locomotive Works. He learned to read and write at the workers' evening classes, taking drawing classes at Lille Academy and, from 1864, also music lessons. He even won first prize in woodwinds and played a number of instruments, including the saxophone! In 1887, Pierre became the conductor of La Lyre des Travailleurs, the socialist choir that met at the premises of La Liberté in the Rue de la Vignette, founded by Gustave Delory, who later became the Socialist mayor of Lille. Pierre joined the musical society of the French Workers' Party (POF) in Lille, which would march through the workers' neighbourhoods playing music during strikes,and election campaigns .
On 15 July 1888, Delory contacted De Geyter to compose music for several "Chants révolutionnaires" that were often sung at popular events with Lille socialists. He gave him a copy of the Chants Révolutionnaires poetry collection by Eugène Pottier. Within it it contained  The Internationale. The lyrics had been written by Eugène Edine Pottier during the "Semaine Sanglante" (the "bloody week," May 22–28, 1871) marking the brutal end and severe repression of the revolutionary Paris Commune of 1871https://teifidancer-teifidancer.blogspot.com/2021/03/150th-anniversary-of-paris-commune.html by the conservative French government in Versailles, cheered on by the ruling classes of the world. 
It took Pierre one Sunday morning to compose his music on a harmonium. According to one source, he then asked his brother Adolphe to play it on the bugle, and subsequently made some minor changes to the music. The rousing new composition was first played by the Lyre des Travailleurs at the yearly fête of the Lille trade union of newspaper sellers in July 1888.The song was a success and the workers’ party branch in Lille decided to print 6,000 flyers of the song.
To protect his job, only "Degeyter" was named as the composer but Pierre was dismissed regardless and was subsequently blacklisted by Lille employers.He encountered financial difficulties and moved to the Parisian suburb of Saint-Denis in 1901. He also became embroiled in painful legal proceedings with his younger brother Adolphe over his copyright, which was only settled in his favour in 1922. To make matters worse, Delory even took Adolphe's side during those proceedings.
 Pierre became a communist and his music was relegated to obscurity in France. He worked as a lamplighter for the township of Saint-Denis from then on. He was soon reduced to performing odd jobs, such as making coffins. In 1902, he left Lille with his wife and daughter and moved to Saint-Denis, near Paris and worked as a lamplighter for the township of Saint-Denis from then on.
The poem  preaching the unity of workers to conquer a free and common land and denouncing the system that covers up the crimes of the rich, was reproduced in other congresses of communist, socialist and workers’ parties and  took the world by storm.The Second International alliance of socialist organizations around the world--which created International Women's Day, for one thing--adopted the song as an official anthem. The Internationale was also incorporated as the official hymn by the Second International, founded in 1889.The Third International, formed after the Russian Revolution of 1917, carried on the tradition. "The Internationale" was the anthem of the USSR after the revolution, until it was dropped in favor of a more explicitly nationalist anthem during the Stalin era.
If the workers were quick to realise that The Internationale was a song that captured the essence of their conditions and aspirations, the authorities were equally quick to realise the threat it represented to status quo.
In 1894, a teacher by the name of Armand Gosselin released a new version of The Internationale and the government immediately put him on trial accused of encouraging military insubordination (verse five). He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year. This attempt to suppress the song had exactly the opposite effect. The trial against Gosselin intensified the interest in the song. By now, nothing could stop The Internationale.
Pottier's words and Pierre De Geyters rousing militant anthem has since been  sung and honoured  by various Labour parties, anarchists, socialists, Trotskistes, Leninists, Communists and all those seeking a  radical, fundamental change in society, many who  have been jailed, even executed, for the mere singing of it.but it has continued to be translated into  hundreds of languages across the globe, with billions of covers on youtube alone. It has been hailed as the most dangerous song on the planet, a rousing song.of continuing universal struggle, the call to the final battle against the tyranny of the world.
A few years before De Geyter’s death an employee of the Soviet Embassy in Paris noticed that the composer of the Internationale was still alive (at that moment the Internationale was the national anthem of the Soviet Union). In 1927 De Geyter was invited as a guest of honour for the celebrations of the tenth anniversary of the October revolution. It is said that tears rolled down his cheeks while his anthem was played. The Soviet Union was also instrumental in providing De Geyter towards the end of his life with some amenities: he received a Russian state pension and the town of Saint-Denis offered him accommodation for free.
In addition to the Internationale De Geyter composed mainly light music and militant songs, a large part of which is conserved in the city library of Lille.
De Geyter died  on  26 September, 1932 in Saint-Denis followed by 50,000 people to the tune of The Internationale. There is a Pierre De Geyter street in Ghent and there are Pierre Degeyter squares both in Lille and in Sant-Denis. On the occasion of the 150th anniversary of his birth date, an exhibition about De Geyter was organized in 1998 by the Masereel Fund and the Archive and Museum of the Socialist Workers’ Movement (AMSAB) in Ghent. In 1999 he received late posthumous recognition by his native city, more specifically a bronze statue in the front yard of the Museum for Industrial Archaeology.
There is an eternal message in Pottier 's words and De Geyter;s song's that is still worth remembering. As bleak times lie ahead, however down- hearted you may feel right now, remember the international ideal unites the human race. De Greyter's  anthem's power to move people, continues to play a role in inspiring and reminding us to  keep standing in solidarity, against the injustices of the world and keep  singing out loud, as we struggle on in our attempt to build a better society.The following is the original song as Pottier wrote it

The Internationale Original  Verses

Debout, les damnés de la terre / Arise, damned of the earth
Debout, les forçats de la faim / Arise, prisoners of hunger
La raison tonne en son cratère, / Reason thunders in its volcano
C’est l’éruption de la fin / This is the eruption of the end
Du passé faisons table rase, / Lets make a clean slate of the past
Foule esclave, debout, debout, / Enslaved masses, arise, arise
Le monde va changer de base / The world is is going to change its foundation
Nous ne sommes rien, soyons tout / We are nothing, we will be all

Chorus:

C’est la lutte finale / This is the final struggle
Groupons-nous, et demain, / Group together, and tomorrow
L’Internationale, / The Internationale
Sera le genre humain. / Will be the human race
Il n’est pas de sauveurs suprêmes, / There are no supreme saviors
Ni Dieu, ni César, ni tribun, / Neither God, nor Caesar, nor tribune
Producteurs sauvons-nous nous-mêmes / Producers, let us save ourselves
Décrétons le salut commun / Decree the common salvation
Pour que le voleur rende gorge, / So that the thief expires
Pour tirer l’esprit du cachot, / To free the spirit from its cell
Soufflons nous-mêmes notre forge, / Let us fan the forge ourselves
Battons le fer tant qu’il est chaud / Strike while the iron’s hot

Chorus

L’État comprime et la loi triche, / The State oppresses and the law cheats
L’impôt saigne le malheureux; / Tax bleeds the unfortunate
Nul devoir ne s’impose au riche, / No duty is imposed on the rich
Le droit du pauvre est un mot creux. / The right of the poor is an empty phrase
C’est assez languir en tutelle, / Enough languishing in custody
L’égalité veut d’autres lois: / Equality wants other laws
«Pas de droits sans devoirs, dit-elle, / No rights without duties she says
Égaux, pas de devoirs sans droits!» / Equally, no duties without rights

Chorus

Hideux dans leur apothéose, / Hideous in their apotheosis
Les rois de la mine et du rail, / The kings of the mine and the rail
Ont-ils jamais fait autre chose, / Have they ever done anything
Que dévaliser le travail? / Than steal work?
Dans les coffres-forts de la bande, / Inside the strong-boxes of the gangs
Ce qu’il a créé s’est fondu. / What work has created is melted
En décrétant qu’on le lui rende, / By ordering that they give it back
Le peuple ne veut que son dû. / The people only want their due

Chorus

Les Rois nous saoulaient de fumées, / The kings made us drunk with fumes
Paix entre nous, guerre aux tyrans / Peace among us, war to the tyrants
Appliquons la grève aux armées, / Let the armies go on strike
Crosse en l’air et rompons les rangs / Stocks in the air, and break ranks
S’ils s’obstinent, ces cannibales, / If these cannibals insist
A faire de nous des héros, / On making heroes of us
Ils sauront bientôt que nos balles / They will know soon enough that our bullets
Sont pour nos propres généraux. / Are for our own generals

Chorus

Ouvriers, Paysans, nous sommes / Workers, peasants, we are
Le grand parti des travailleurs; / The great party of laborers
La terre n’appartient qu’aux hommes, / The earth belongs only to men
L’oisif ira loger ailleurs. / The idle will go reside elsewhere
Combien de nos chairs se repaissent / How much of our flesh have they consumed
Mais si les corbeaux, les vautours, / But if these ravens, these vultures
Un de ces matins disparaissent, / Disappear one of these days
Le soleil brillera toujours / The sun will shine forever
Chorus

The first verse and refrain of the American version goes like this:

Arise ye prisoners of starvation
Arise ye wretched of the earth
For justice thunders condemnation
A better world's in birth!

No more tradition's chains shall bind us
Arise, ye slaves, no more in thrall
The earth shall rise on new foundations
We have been naught we shall be all.

'Tis the final conflict
Let each stand in their place
The international working class
Shall free the human race.

  

The late Alistair Hulett was inspired to create the following.
 

Billy Bragg  recently rewrote the song in an attempt to remind us what we are still fighting for, Whether you like Bragg's music or not, there is a message at this song's core that is worth remembering. 

 


Monday, 3 October 2022

Truss off!

Sitting in darkness
Controlled by the few;
Walking through treacle
With toxicant glue.

With days getting colder
Jack Frost starts to bite,
No heating to counteract
With money so tight.

As Loopy and Krazy
Press self destruct,
The state of the country
Is totally fucked.

While Lizzie the lizard
Crawls on her belly,
Millions everywhere
Turn off the telly.

Truss the speaker
Robotic and dull,
Spouts vacuous claptrap
Of a birdbrained numbskull.

Takes from the needy
Gives to the rich,
Boundaries are alien
To this virulent bitch.

Kwarteng in his wisdom
Brings austerity to the poor,
Cuts taxes of the wealthy
As the pound hits the floor.

A lame opposition
So spineless and weak;
With ineffectual efforts
The future looks bleak.

Saturday, 1 October 2022

The Colours of Creation



Creation is fantastic
Like leaves blowing in wind 
Evident in music, painting
Writing or speaking 
Whistling its tune.

Every colour enables the rainbow
Each pivotal shade
Poised in splendour
Enriched by magic
Spellbound in stone.

As Cancer of austerity stalks
Leaving anger burning 
Senses and minds boiling
Prisoners of rotten malaise
Seek new vibration. 

Words that mold 
In poetic sequence
Channeling messages
In this catastrophic botch
Of hope and reparation.

Instrumental sounds
Surge the staves
Reaching a crescendo
Shaking the regime
Sending shockwaves through the nation. 

Wednesday, 28 September 2022

Remembering The Second Intifada

 

From the very first day that Israeli soldiers set foot on Palestine and started the occupation, the Palestinian people have fought that invasion and resisted the occupation.The word Intifada originates in the Arabic root “to shake,” and contextually means uprising. It entered the English dictionary on December 8 1987 with the eruption of the First Intifada in a refugee camp in the Gaza Strip when an Israeli settler identified as Herzel Boukiza rammed his vehicle into Palestinian workers returning home through Erez/Beit Hanoun checkpoint between Israel and Gaza. Four workers from Jabalya and Maghazi in the Gaza Strip were killed in the terror attack. Protests and violence erupted; only to end in 1993 with the signature of the Oslo Accords.The word Intifada has since  become synonymous with the Palestinian unarmed rebellion against Israel’s occupation.
The Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, lasted from 28 September 2000 to 8 February 2005. This second mass resistance movement against the Israeli occupation was sparked by then-candidate for Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s  and his right wing Likud party delegation, stormed the Al Aqsa mosque with thousands of troops deployed in and around the Old City of Jerusalem, Al Quds. therefore violating the terms of the status quo in Jerusalem.  According to the historical arrangement governing the site, which both Jews and Muslims recognize as sacred to their traditions, the compound is administered by the Islamic Waqf. By storming the compound and entering al-Aqsa Mosque with his supporters under heavy military escort, Sharon was signaling that Israel had total control of the site and could disregard centuries-old arrangements between Muslims and Jews.
Sharon's visit was condemned by the Palestinians as a provocation as well as an incursion since his bodyguards were armed. Shortly after Sharon left the site, angry demonstrations by Palestinians erupted outside the compound. The broader context behind the uprising was the failure of the US-based Camp David negotiations between PM Ehud Barak and Yassir Arafat.
What began as a few hundred protesters throwing shoes at Sharon's police escort following prayers at al-Aqsa mosque had within hours erupted into demonstrations across the Palestinian territories, with chants of "we want an intifada". The following day, September 29,in a extremely harsh reaction. Israeli forces opened fire on crowds of unarmed demonstrators in al-Aqsa compound, killing seven and wounding more than 100. "People are being massacred! Bring the ambulances," echoed from the mosque's loudspeakers. Demonstrations raged throughout the West Bank and Gaza. Israeli forces repeatedly met the stone-throwing crowds with live ammunition.In Gaza, a French broadcast crew captured footage of a boy called Mohammed al-Durrahhttps://teifidancer-teifidancer.blogspot.com/2013/09/in-memory-of-mohammed-al-durrrah.html being shot repeatedly by Israeli forces as he clung to his father. Moments later, a paramedic from the Palestinian Red Crescent Society was killed as he attempted to treat the boy and his father.The scene assumed iconic status as it was shown around the world demonstrating Israel's blatant violence against Palestinians.
Inside the Green Line, too, riots took hold in Palestinian communities, with 13 Palestinian citizens of Israel killed in the first days of protests As the intensity of the demonstrations increased, so too did international and human rights groups' condemnation of Israel's violent attempts to suppress what was quickly becoming an uprising. 
Malka, the head of Israeli military intelligence at the time, said that Israeli forces fired more than 1,300,000 bullets in the territories in the first month alone."This is a strategic figure that says that our soldiers are shooting and shooting and shooting," Malka said about what amounted to some 40,000 rounds a day.""The significance is that we are determining the height of the flames."
Palestinian stone-throwers were met with Israeli snipers; gunmen, with helicopter gunships and tanks. 
Whereas the first intifada (1987-1992) was defined by popular protest, general strikes and stones - and to be sure, harsh Israeli counter-measures, including the infamous order by Yitzhak Rabin to break the bones of stone-throwing Palestinians - it was immediately clear that this new uprising was different. Demonstrations were being met with overwhelming force by Israel and it made popular protest impossible. Some analysts point to this overwhelming force by Israeli forces as the reason why the phase of popular protest in the Intifada ended quickly, and armed resistance took its place.
In February 2001, the Israeli public backed the strategy when General Sharon was elected prime minister. While suicide attacks came to define the Palestinian armed struggle, these operations did not begin in earnest until more than a year into the uprising, and after the deaths of more than 400 Palestinians. Against a heavily armed and armored Israeli force, the kind of guerrilla warfare that the Palestinians had access to - namely, ambushes, shooting attacks and defensive armed struggle - was strictly limited and of marginal impact. While Hamas and Islamic Jihad carried out the most attacks, all factions were involved - including secular elements of Fatah's al-Aqsa Brigades and the leftist PFLP.
The Second Intifada also had a prominent unarmed character that was largely overlooked by mainstream media, with local Palestinian communities organizing predominantly nonviolent actions to combat the expropriation of Palestinian land by Israeli settlements and the illegal Separation Barrier; Israeli and international civilians were also involved in many of these actions
Israel's campaign to suppress the uprising took a heavy toll on ordinary Palestinians.During the Al Aqsa Intifada, Israel caused unprecedented damage to the Palestinian economy and infrastructure. Israel reoccupied areas governed by the Palestinian Authority and began construction of its separation wall.
Significantly, the Palestinian leadership was also decimated by a concerted campaign of assassination.While some assassinations were ambushes by undercover Israeli units, helicopters increasingly became a fixture of Israeli attacks.Helicopter gunships and anti-tank missiles were used on cars, offices and homes.They hovered over Palestinian cities and refugee camps. Avi Dichter, Israel's internal security chief during the intifada, characterized the policy by stating simply: "When a Palestinian child draws a picture of the sky, he doesn't draw it without a helicopter."
Between November 2000 and September 2004, Israel carried out at least 273 assassinations, according to data compiled by the Institute for Palestine Studies.High profile assassinations included Abu Ali Mustafa, the general secretary of the PFLP, in 2001, and the top Hamas leaders and founders, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin and Abdel Aziz Rantissi, in 2004.
Perhaps most notoriously, in July 2002, Israeli warplanes dropped a 2,000-pound bomb on a Gaza apartment building that housed Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades commander Salah Shehade and his family. The Hamas founder was killed along with 15 others, including his wife and nine children. The Shehade assassination led to notable criticism, even within Israel, where it inspired the so-called "pilots' letter" - a declaration by several Israeli air force pilots refusing to carry out bombing raids over the occupied territory. The then leader of the Palestinian Liberation Orgnisation (PLO) Yasser Arafat’s headquarters was also demolished and besieged by Israeli forces. 
In what is perhaps the defining moment of the Intifada, in the Jenin refugee camp, Palestinian fighters held off the Israeli offensive of more than 1,000 soldiers during several days of fierce fighting to effectively enter the camp with ground troops, Israel responded by bombing the camp with helicopters and warplanes, shelling it with tanks, and ultimately bulldozing a massive section of the camp - leaving 4,000 homeless according to Human Rights Watch. In 10 days, 52 Palestinians and 23 Israeli soldiers were killed in what became known as the Battle of Jenin.
In April 2002, Israel invaded the West Bank en masse in an operation titled "Defensive Shield", and reoccupied Palestinian cities and towns in the largest military offensive in Palestinian territory since 1967. According to a report by the UN secretary general, 500 Palestinians were killed and more than 6,000 were arrested during the campaign.  
Unlike the First Intifada, which ended at the signing of the Oslo Accords  there is no clear ending date to the Second Intifada. Some claim the uprising ended with Yasser Arafat's death in November 2004, while others say it culminated with a truce signed in February 2005 between Abbas and Sharon, then-Prime Minister of Israel, in Sharm al-Shaikh, Egypt where it.was agreed to the resumption of talks to reach the so called “two state solution”.
Sharon also agreed to release 900 of the 7500 Palestinian prisoners being held at the time and to withdraw from West Bank towns that had been reoccupied during the Intifada. Israel, however, never fulfilled its end of the bargain, which comes as no surprise. 
Two days later, Hamas contested the ceasefire and fired rockets at an illegal settlement near the Gaza Strip. The move prompted Abbas to sack senior security officials within the group, causing tension within Palestinian factions.
The rift grew the following year when Hamas triumphed over Fatah in elections. Ongoing disputes between the groups often led to violent confrontations and in 2007 Hamas eventually asserted control over the Gaza Strip, leaving Fatah to retreat to the West Bank. The divide has endured for over 10 years despite attempts to reconcile, leaving Palestinians frustrated at their state of political limbo. The factions mean the Palestinian territories are divided between two rival powers, and reconciliation attempts have so far failed although recently Hamas and Fatah appear united by their opposition to Arab-Israeli normalisation deals.
The Intifada was, and still is, an expression of a deep disappointment and frustr.ation over the ongoing disrespect and denial of basic rights for Palestinians caused by the occupation – including the right to free access to Jerusalem, security and development, and the refugees’ right to return.
Whilst Palestinians made some material gains as a result of the intifada, after the ceasefire Israeli aggression intensified and human rights violations increased. The peace process was stalled for many years as Israel vehemently opposed a two-state solution.The settler community have also been emboldened, with greater construction and government support for illegal settlement activity.
Palestinians who grew up in the shadow of the uprising, a not to distant memory, sadly find themselves surrounded by physical and political barriers with little hope for the future. The Israeli military controls 60 percent of the West Bank, and in Gaza, Palestinians are facing considerably worse conditions, with the Israeli blockade leading to perennial power cuts, a lack of clean water, and a youth unemployment rate hitting 65 percent, according to World Bank data leaving .many Palestinians lamenting how the occupation has been normalised over the decades following the unrealised Oslo accords.
The current situation in the occupied territories and Jerusalem, is in many ways reminiscent of the period leading up to the Second Intifada. At the time, continued settlement expansion and the failure of the talks at Camp David in the summer of 2000, to finalize implementation of the 1995 Oslo Accords, originally drawn up as interim agreements has reinforced Palestinian public disillusion with the so-called peace process who have also seen that real peace is not a priority for Israel, nor is ending the conflict with the Palestinians. Israel has to be compelled to make peace a priority, because today the West Bank, which has been under Israeli military occupation since 1967, is simmering.
Stationed throughout the West Bank, Israeli soldiers, police and private security firms protect settler populations that the international community consider illegal  at the expense of Palestinian civilians. In this hyper-militarized environment, Palestinian children have face disproportionate physical violence, restricted access to education, and psychological trauma. 
Between the near-nightly Israeli raids, the clashes, the ensuing deaths, arrests and the ongoing animosity between Al Fatah and Hamas in Palestine, and the hawks and doves in Israel, it all continues to make dialogue difficult and peace a permanent mirage and because of this, there are fears it could soon boil over into a third Intifada, or popular uprising that would include all forms or means of struggle against the ongoing Israeli occupation. Where there is oppression resistance will thrive.

Sunday, 25 September 2022

Remembering the Radical Abstract Expressionist Artist Mark Rothko ( September 25, 1903 – February 25, 1970)

 

Mark Rothko ( Marcus Rothkowitz )  was born in Divinksk, Russia,,today Latvia. on the 25th of September 1903, the fourth child born to Jacob and Anna Rothkovich was one of the most well-known members of the Abstract  Expressionist  movement. As Russia was a hostile environment for Zionist Jews, Jacob immigrated to the United States with his two older sons in 1910, finally sending for the rest of his family in 1913. They settled in Portland, Oregon. His father  was a pharmacist of modest means who believed strongly in a secular and political education for his children. The youngest of four siblings, Rothko was the only one to study the Talmud in a family long affected by fear of their homeland’s anti-Semitism. 
Jacob passed away of  cancer shortly after their immigration to the United States, leaving them without means for support. Only 10 years old at the time, his fathers untimely death a year later shook him badly, but Rothko continued his studies at school, and  was forced to take jobs in his uncle’s warehouse to help his mother, Sonia, make ends meet.. It resulted in a lingering sense of bitterness over his lost childhood. This tragedy was the first in a series of the events that would torture the soul of a sensitive and emotional artist throughout life.
Among the workers,though  he became a passionate proponent of labor rights and revolutionary politics.Portland at the time was the epicentre of revolutionary activity in the US at the time, and the area where the revolutionary syndicalist union the Industrial Workers of the World, was strongest. Marcus, having grown up around radical workers' meetings, attended meetings of the IWW and with other anarchists like Bill Haywood and Emma Goldman, where he developed strong oratorical skills he would later use in defence of Surrealism.
 He graduated early from Lincoln High School, showing more interest in music than visual art. He was awarded a scholarship to Yale University, but soon found the environment at Yale conservative. racist and elitist.As the U.S.’s entry into World War I encouraged a push for immigrants to assimilate and the Bolshevik Revolution (which his family supported) brought on the first Red Scare, Rothko promoted free expression by introducing a letters-to-the-editor column in his high school newspaper. While attending Yale he and a couple of friends founded the publication the Saturday Evening Pest, which promised to critique “international politics, capitalism, socialism, immigration, and poverty.”  He left the university without graduating in 1923, and did not return until he was awarded an honorary degree forty-six years later.
 He spoke four languages- Russian, Yiddish, Hebrew, and English, and experienced many cultures which greatly enriched his art. After leaving Yale, Mark Rothko made his way to New York City, as he put it, "to bum about and starve a bit." He studied in the Parsons New School for Design, where one of his instructors was the artist Arshile Gorky, American avant-garde painter of Armenian origin. Over the next few years, he had taken odd jobs before he enrolled at early American Cubist painter Max Weber's still life and figure drawing classes at the Art Students League. A highly criticized figure in the art world, Weber was likewise a Russian Jew who taught the philosophies and methods of Modernism’s major movements. Rothko in particular admired the work of Expressionists Henri Matisse and Milton Avery, and his early paintings emulated their abstracted figurative styles with flat areas of color. It was also under Weber that Rothko began to consider his art as a means of religious and emotional expression.  According to Rothko, this was the beginning of his life as an artist. Rothko's early works were mostly portraits, nudes, and images of urban scenes.
In 1932, he married jewellery designer Edith Sachar, but separated from herin the summer of 1937. They reconciled several months later, yet their relationship remained tense
By the mid-1930s, the effects of the Great Depression were being felt throughout American society, and Rothko had become concerned with the social and political implications of mass unemployment. Working in the Easel Division of the Works Progress Administration, Rothko met many other artists, yet he felt most at ease with a group that consisted mainly of other Russian Jewish painters. This group, which included such figures as Adolph Gottlieb, Joseph Solman and John Graham, showed together at Gallery Secession in 1934, and became known as "The Ten". They sought to communicate human emotion and drama through their paintings.
In the 1930s, Rothko continued to explore different styles and methods. His Subway series depicted the underground subway environments of New York City in a melancholy palette. Although realistic and immediately recognizable with figures throughout, the series emphasized the architectural spaces as abstract compositional arrangements, a key concept he would later develop in his mature work. 
On February 21, 1938, Rothko finally became a citizen of the United States, prompted by fears that the growing Nazi influence in Europe might provoke sudden deportation of American Jews. Concerned about anti-Semitism in America and Europe, Rothko in 1940 abbreviated his name from "Marcus Rothkowitz" to "Mark Rothko." The name "Roth," a common abbreviation, was still identifiably Jewish, so he settled upon "Rothko."
As World War II took hold of American life, Rothko and his fellow artists began to depart from representational work in favor of the symbolism of Surrealism. He became a passionate advocate for the style, stating that, “A time came when none of us could use the figure without mutilating it.” Fearing that modern American painting had reached a conceptual dead end, Rothko was intent upon exploring subjects other than urban and nature scenes. He sought subjects that would complement his growing interest with form, space, and color. The world crisis of war lent this search an immediacy because he insisted that the new subject matter have a social impact, yet be able to transcend the confines of current political symbols and values. 
In his essay, "The Romantics Were Prompted," published in 1949, Rothko argued that the "archaic artist ... found it necessary to create a group of intermediaries, monsters, hybrids, gods and demigods" in much the same way that modern man found intermediaries in Fascism and the Communist Party. For Rothko, "without monsters and gods, art cannot enact a drama.
The tragedy of World War II seems to have had the irreversible consequences for the fragile psyche of the artist. His dream (not destined to be realized) would be to paint a series of canvases for the museum dedicated to the Holocaust. Throughout his life, in most of his works, he sought to express the depth of despair and horror before the deeds of the humanity.
On June 13, 1943, Rothko and Sachar separated again. Rothko suffered a long depression following their divorce. Thinking that a change of scenery might help, Rothko returned to Portland. From there he traveled to Berkeley, where he met artist Clyfford Still, and the two began a close relationship. Still's deeply abstract paintings would be of considerable influence on Rothko's later works.
In the autumn of 1943, Rothko returned to New York, where he met noted collector and art dealer Peggy Guggenheim, who was initially reluctant to take on his work. Rothko’s one-man show at Guggenheim's The Art of This Century Gallery in late 1945 resulted in few sales (prices ranging from $150 to $750) and in less-than-favorable reviews. During this period, Rothko had been stimulated by Still's abstract landscapes of color, and his style shifted away from surrealism. Rothko's experiments in interpreting he unconscious symbolism of everyday forms had run their course. His future lay with abstraction.
Rothko's 1945 masterpiece, Slow Swirl at the Edge of the Sea, illustrates his newfound propensity towards abstraction. It has been interpreted as a meditation on Rothko's courtship of his second wife, Mary Ellen "Mell" Beistle, whom he met in 1944 and married in the spring of 1945. The painting presents, in subtle grays and browns, two human-like forms embraced in a swirling, floating atmosphere of shapes and colors. The rigid rectangular background foreshadows Rothko's later experiments in pure color. The painting was completed, not coincidentally, in the year the Second World War ended.


 He and Mary had two children, one of whom would later publish a book Rothko had written called The Artist's Reality. It is believed the book was written in the 1940s when Rothko took a break from painting and read a lot of mythology and also existentialist works by German philosopher Friedrich Nietzche.
By the beginning of the 1950s, his signature style, ragged rectangular forms on the colored fields, which employed shimmering color to convey a sense of spirituality. Rothko's art is distinguished by a rare degree of sustained concentration on pure pictorial properties such as color, surface, proportion, and scale, accompanied by the conviction that those elements could disclose the presence of a high philosophical truth. Visual elements such as luminosity, darkness, broad space, and the contrast of colors have been linked, by the artist himself as well as other commentators, to profound themes such as tragedy, ecstasy, and the sublime. Rothko, however, generally avoided explaining the content of his work, believing that the abstract image could directly represent the fundamental nature of "human drama." 
His works began to be in great demand, putting Rothko in the top ten of the most highly paid artists of his time.For the next 20 years of his life, Rothko would work in this groundbreaking format,exploring  colours in all its depths and hues,,developing a new language of feeling, exploring freedom and movement. achieving an impressive range of emotion and mood. The massive scale of the paintings intentionally envelops the viewer, creating a feeling of intimacy. Rothko hung the paintings close to the floor in groups, with low lighting, and required that no other art works be shown in proximity. The effect is quietly meditative, for many inviting spiritual contemplation. One of his foremost collectors, Dominque de Menil, summed up this late work by saying the paintings, “…evoke the tragic mystery of our perishable condition. The silence of God. The unbearable silence of God.”
Rothko said that his paintings were large in order to make the viewer part of the experience rather than separate from the painting. In fact, he preferred to have his paintings shown together in an exhibit in order to create a greater impact of being contained or enveloped by the paintings, rather than broken up by other artworks. He said that the paintings were monumental not to be "grandiose", but in fact, to be more "intimate and human."
In 1960 the Phillips Gallery built a special room dedicated to displaying Mark Rothko's painting, called The Rothko Room. It contains four paintings by the artist, one painting on each wall of a small room, giving the space a meditative quality.  
In 1961, Rothko was given  major retrospective exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. After years of teaching art to sunsidise his paintings, this show finally brought him the success he deserved.
Rothko was then commissioned in 1964 by John and Dominique de Menial to create a meditative space filled with his paintings created specifically for the space. The Rothko Chapel, designed in collaboration with architects Philip Johnson, Howard Barnstone, and Eugene Aubry, was ultimately completed in 1971, although Rothko died in 1970 so did not see the final building. It is an irregular octagonal brick building that holds fourteen of Rothko's mural paintings. The paintings are Rothko's signature floating rectangles, although they are darkly hued - seven canvases with hard-edged black rectangles on maroon ground, and seven purple tonal paintings.
It is an interfaith chapel that people visit from all over the world. According to The Rothko Chapel website,"The Rothko Chapel is a spiritual space, a forum for world leaders, a place for solitude and gathering. It’s an epicenter for civil rights activists, a quiet disruption, a stillness that moves. It’s a destination for the 90,000 people of all faiths who visit each year from all parts of the world. It is the home of the Óscar Romero Award."



Mark Rothko supported the social revolutionary ideas of his youth throughout his life. In particular, he was all for the artists' total freedom of expression, which was compromised by the market, as he felt it. This belief often put him at odds with the art world establishment, leading him to publicly respond to critics and occasionally refuse the commissions, sales and exhibitions.As a mature painter, Rothko signed an open letter with eighteen other artists (collectively called the “Irascibles”) to Roland L. Redmond, the president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, protesting against the museum’s forthcoming exhibition “American Painters, 1900–50,” which favored figural work to the Abstract Expressionist art then prevalent in the city. In 1959 he reportedly scrapped a commission by the Four Seasons because he didn’t want his work hanging in the hotel’s outrageously expensive restaurant.
 Later in life with the death of the Russian Revolution, the destruction of the Spanish Revolution by Communists and Fascists, and the rise of the Nazis Rothko became disillusioned as to whether there was any hope for social change. But he claimed "I am still an anarchist"!

Rothko was both fortified by his powerful Jewish heritage, a heritage which is one of the oldest, most tenacious and demanding to be found anywhere - one embodying a collective superego and an ethic of cosmic proportion.Rothko himself did not actually adhere to any particular religious faith, but to me his work remains  very mystical imbued with so many layers of meaning.
In 1968, Rothko suffered an aortic aneurysm, this brush with death would shadow him for the rest of his life. Despite his fame, Rothko felt a growing personal seclusion and a sense of being misunderstood as an artist. He feared that people purchased his paintings simply out of fashion and that the true purpose of his work was not being grasped by collectors, critics, or audiences. He wanted his paintings to move beyond abstraction, as well as beyond classical art. For Rothko, the paintings were objects that possessed their own form and potential, and therefore, must be encountered as such. Sensing the futility of words in describing this decidedly non-verbal aspect of his work, Rothko abandoned all attempts at responding to those who inquired after its meaning and purpose, stating finally that silence is 
 
"so accurate." "My paintings' surfaces are expansive and push outward in all directions, or their surfaces contract and rush inward in all directions. Between these two poles, you can find everything I want to say."
 
Rothko began to insist that he was not an abstractionist and that such a description was as inaccurate as labeling him a great colorist. His interest was

only in expressing basic human emotions — tragedy, ecstasy, doom, and so on. And the fact that a lot of people break down and cry when confronted with my pictures shows that I can communicate those basic human emotions . . . The people who weep before my pictures are having the same religious experience I had when I painted them. And if you, as you say, are moved only by their color relationship, then you miss the point.

Ignoring doctor's orders, Rothko continued to drink and smoke heavily, avoided exercise, and maintained an unhealthy diet. "Highly nervous, thin, restless" was his friend Dore Ashton's description of him at this time. However, he did follow the medical advice given not to paint pictures larger than a yard in height and turned his attention to smaller, less physically strenuous formats, including acrylics on paper.
Meanwhile, Rothko's marriage had become increasingly troubled, and his poor health and impotence resulting from the aneurysm compounded his feeling of estrangement in the relationship. Rothko and his wife Mell separated on New Year's Day 1969, and he moved into his studio.
Despite the phenomenal demand for his art within his lifetime, the artist was haunted by depression, poor health and alcohol addictions and likely an undiagnosed bipolar disorder. On February 25, 1970, after being unable  to recover from this  phase of deep sadness, Oliver Steindecker, Rothko's assistant, found the artist in his kitchen, lying dead on the floor in front of the sink, covered in blood. He had sliced his arms with a razor found lying at his side. The autopsy revealed that he had also overdosed on anti-depressants. He was sixty-six years old.  
 
 
He had in his possession nearly 800 paintings  yet within months of the funeral, his three trusted friends, acting as executors, relinquished his entire legacy of paintings to the powerful, international Marlborough Galleries (run by Frank Lloyd) for a fraction of their real worth on terms suspiciously unfavourable to the estate. The suit that Rothko’s daughter brought against the executors and Marlborough rocked the art world with its shocking revelations of corruption in the international art trade: from the deceptions practiced on Rothko when he was alive to the scandals after his death involving conspiracies and cover-ups, double dealings and betrayals, missing paintings and manipulated markets, phony sales and laundered profits, forgery and fraud.
After a long court case his works were divided between his two children and the Mark Rothko Foundation .In 1984, the foundation’s paintings were donated to 19 museums in the United States, Great Britain, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Israel. The largest and best portion of these went to the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. A collection of murals originally commissioned for the Seagram Building in New York City is held by the Tate in London. Rothko's grave at East Marion Cemetery, East Marion, New York..

Painting consumed Rothko’s life, and although he did not receive the attention he felt his work deserved in his own troubled lifetime, his fame has increased dramatically in the years following his death. At odds with the more formally rigorous artists among the Abstract Expressionists, Rothko nevertheless explored the compositional potential of color and form on the human psyche.
While his work is greatly admired by many, and is remembered as a boundary-breaking pioneer of 20th-century art. his detractors either view his attempts at expressing the sublime as over ambitious or see his paintings as boring  and unimpressive. Personally I was once fortunate to go and  see an exhibition of his work in the Tate and standing before his huge, mute abstract canvasses was drawn into an experience that required no real knowledge of the aesthetics of art - to something quite transcendent, and to feel, if only momentarily, something of the sublime spirituality he relentlessly sought to evoke.it was pretty powerful stuff !  His work remains forever intimate and timeless.