Wednesday, 15 November 2023

Magnitude of Fear




In times of darkness
Tears rolling down cheeks,
The screams of children
Created by genocidal intent,
Rage difficult to compress
Mind and hearts broken,
Grief shattering lives
Justice buried and denied,
Morality dissipated
Destruction released,
Ignorance leading the blind
As humanity is besmirched,
A land soaked in blood
It''s people clothed with anxiety,
Sadness overflowing
Caused by hellish terror,
Feelings of death
Hang' upon the air,
Beyond our anger
Our collective pain,
Energy sapped
Emotions stirred,
Spirits drained 
Fury unbridled,
Rustling leaves
Clutter skies,
Beseeching the grey
In emerging light, 
Where souls shift
Towards peace.

Thursday, 9 November 2023

Suella Braverman Does Not Speak For Me

 

The longer Israeli genocide goes on, the louder we must continue to call it out and stand in solidarity with Palestine. Ignore Nazis like  Suella Braverman. Together we can end the suffering of countless civilians. So many lives depend on us.
The Home Secretary has written a shocking article in the Times and accused police of “double standards” and “playing favourites” with protesters as a pro-Palestine march on Armistice Day looks set to go ahead in London.  She said: “I do not believe that these marches are merely a cry for help for Gaza.  “They are an assertion of primacy by certain groups — particularly Islamists — of the kind we are more used to seeing in Northern Ireland. Also disturbingly reminiscent of Ulster are the reports that some of Saturday’s march group organisers have links to terrorist groups, including Hamas.”
It's the latest in a long line of behaviour that seems more focused on grabbing headlines, than actually helping people up and down the country. Braverman is out of control, she could not care less about public safety. She's completely driven by her own agenda and ambition, but where is the PM. did he sign off on this inflammatory rhetoric. Why is he too weak to sack her? . 
Braverman  is an utterly irresponsible, dangerous racist, vile, poisonous, deranged  and the most  useless Home Secretary this country has ever seen, attacking the police, smearing  pro palestinian protestors and inflaming tensions in Northern Ireland. Not to mention her complete inhumanity by saying homelessness is a lifestyle choice or her nasty anti-immigrant, anti-refugee dog whistling rhetoric.
She is absolutely repugnant. A soulless far right wing fanatic.Many remember Enoch Powells “rivers of blood” speech and the trouble and division it caused. Braverman  seems intent on doing exactly the same stirring up the far right groups and individuals not just in her own party but across the country.
A Home Secretary is supposed to be responsible for the nation's security and wellbeing. Sadly, this vile UK incumbent instead is a shameless enabler of hate and division who has no place in UK political life.There is a vicious aspect to this person which also does not belong in society and needs locking up. 
She does not speak for me. Every day that she remains in post is another day of shame for this decaying government and spineless prime minister Surely for the sake of security and to prevent further damage she needs to be removed from office? Now.
Enough is enough. Please sign the following petition to sack Suella :-

Tuesday, 7 November 2023

King's Speech 2023

 


Panto season has started early this year. an unelected parasitic, nonce-protecting  King with 23 luxury residences including multiple palaces sits on a gold throne  and reads out a list a measures  from a unelected Prime Minister of a corrupt party on what they will do to continue supporting fascism, inequality,unaccountable power. while depriving the British people of their liberties, targeting the right to strike and protest. and destroying the planet. that will do nothing for the poor, the hungry or the homeless.  It will never be not ridiculous that this guy sits there  while wearing enough jewellery to make a large dent in solving health inequalities would they be sold .talking about the cost of living crisis for the rest of us. His crown travels in a separate car by the way. Utterly grotesque. Can this antiquated, antediluvian  ritual of Kings Speech truly represent UK  2023.  Anyone still believe  we are living in a Democracy?
Ahead of the speech, anti-monarchy protesters gathered outside parliament with placards which read: "Not my king!". They could be heard booing the King as he left parliament for Buckingham Palace once he had delivered the speech. Campaign group Republic organised the anti-monarchy protest outside Westminster,  Around 500 people turned up for the protest and a statement on Republic’s Twitter/X account said: “We’ve just told Charles that he’s not our King at the State Opening of Parliament!  “500 republicans have today turned up to protest for democracy and the right to elect our head of state – thank you all for the amazing support.” Writing on Twitter/X, Republic CEO Graham Smith pointed out that the BBC had made no mention of the boos on its live blog.
The Kings Speech was an opportunity to set out a vision for the future: to bring down energy bills, cut emissions and restore nature. Nothing was said in the Kings Speech today about the severe hardship millions of families are facing.the cost of living crisis, energy costs  NHS Crisis. poverty. Despite the emphasis on crime, there was no mention of the recent pro-Palestinian protests that have been taking place across the UK, and which Ms Braverman has described as "hate marches".  Her controversial plans to restrict the use of tents for people who are homeless were also not raised by the King.The government is also continuing its attack on freedom of speech and expression through the Economic Activity of Public Bodies Bill.  Uniquely shielding Israel from criticism amid allegations of war crimes in Gaza is deeply concerning. It is also clear mental health is not a priority for this Government. No mention of the Mental Health Act being reformed. To name just a few of the current serious  issues. No investment, no help, and nothing was said about how the UK government plans to fix this.  It’s not right that families are having to turn to food banks.. 
The King's Speech just served as a vehicle for Rishi Sunak to further his desperate pursuit of short-term political point scoring, at the expense of the public,The most vulnerable in society failed yet again. This is what Charles should have been said today," My government is full of crap, has run out of ideas, and lacks integrity, professionalism and accountability. A general election is what the people want and what the country needs.;" Hang on though where's the bloody opposition, The country;s  fucked. .It's time to fight back and continue to question the relevance of the monarchy.

Thursday, 2 November 2023

106th anniversary of the infamous Balfour Declaration

 

 Lord Arthur Balfour
 
On this day, 106 years ago, one of history's most unjust declarations was made, when on November 2, 1917 the British government issued the  Balfour Declaration, which laid the foundation for the establishment of a Jewish state at the expense of the indigenous Palestinian population. The ramifications would be seen up until the present day and is regarded as one of the most controversial and contested documents in modern history. The genocide we are witnessing in Gaza today is a direct result of these colonial efforts. 
It was named after Lord Arthur James Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary during the Word War 1, who on an order by United Kingdom’s Prime Minister at that time, David Lloyd George,sent an official letter  to Baron Walter Rothschild (the 2nd Baron Rothschild), a leader of the British Zionist community, who accepted it on behalf of Great Britain and Ireland.
The document was quite short, consisting of only 67 words in three paragraphs. However, the impact was enormous: the declaration was the beginning of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which has not ended.The immortal words of the letter said the following:

His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by jews in any other country."

The Original Letter of the Balfour Declaration
 
 

With the Balfour Declaration, London was seeking Jewish support for its war efforts, and the Zionist push for a homeland for Jews was an emerging political force. In 1917, Jews constituted 10% of the population, the rest were  Arabs. Yet Britain recognised the national rights of a tiny minority and denied it to the majority This was a classic colonial document which totally disregarded the rights and aspirations of the indigenous population. In the words of Jewish writer Arthur Koestler: “One nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.”And in the words of the late Palestinian academic Edward Said, the declaration was “made by a European power … about a non-European territory … in a flat disregard of both the presence and wishes of the native majority resident in that territory. 
 The indigenous Palestinian population’s political and national rights were ignored in the Balfour Declaration, not to mention their ethnic and national identity. Instead, Great Britain promised not to “prejudice the[ir] civil and religious rights,” and referred to Palestinians as “non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” The percentage of Jews living in Palestine in 1917 did not exceed 7%, yet the British attempted to rewrite history in order to justify their colonial policy.
It was a shock to the Arab world, which had not been consulted and had received promises of independence of its own in the post-war break up of the defeated Ottoman Empire. The Palestinians have always condemned the declaration, which they refer to as the "Balfour promise" saying Britain was giving away land it did not own.
The Balfour Declaration constituted a dangerous historical precedent and a blatant breach of all international laws and norms, and this  act of the British Empire to “give” the land of another people  for colonial settlement created the conditions for countless atrocities against the Palestinian people. Balfour, in a 1919 confidential memo, wrote: 
 “Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age old traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far greater import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land”  
For all those that celebrate the Balfour Declaration. Balfour was an antisemite and wanted to migrate Jews out of Britain to solve the "Jewish problem".  Arthur Balfour wrote about the Zionist movement that it would “mitigate the age-long miseries created for Western civilization by the presence in its midst of a Body [Jews] which it too long regarded as alien and even hostile, but which it was equally unable to expel or to absorb.
The discriminatory language used by Sir Arthur Balfour and seen in the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate reveal the prejudiced rational behind British foreign policy in Palestine. A month after the Balfour Declaration on 2 December 1917, the British army occupied Jerusalem. In 1923, the British Mandate for Palestine came into effect, and included the entire text of the Balfour Declaration. Through the Mandate, Britain would go on to rule Palestine for three decades.
The Mandate for Palestine constituted the entire legal framework for how Britain should operate during its occupation of Palestine. Despite this, the Mandate made no mention of the Palestinians by name, nor did it specify the right of Palestinians to nationhood. Instead, it was during its rule in Palestine that Britain sought to lay the foundations for the creation of a ‘national home for the Jewish people’
By the end of the 1920s, it became clear that this ambition would have violent repercussions.Between 1936 and 1939, thousands of Palestinians were killed and imprisoned as they revolted in protest against British policy.
The British response took a heavy toll on the livelihoods of Palestinian villagers, who were subjected to punitive measures that included the confiscation of livestock, the destruction of properties, detention and collective fines. During this time, British forces’ are said to have carried out beatings, extrajudicial killings and torture as they attempted to quell the uprising. To this day, there are still the ‘Tegart Forts’ in Palestine built and named by Sir Charles Tegart who had been stationed in India to punish those fighting against the British Raj and then later stationed in Palestine to control any Arab dissent.
For Palestinians, Britain’s three decades of occupation in Palestine was a turning point in the country’s history, laying the foundations for what would become decades of occupation, displacement and insecurity.
When the UK eventually decided to withdraw from from Palestine in May 1948  when the Israeli state was established. By this point, the Zionist paramilitary army was ready with a plan to colonise Palestine and the newly established United Nations was ready to take over the role of legitimising the occupation. 
This time is known by Palestinians as the Nakba or ‘catastrophe’, when large-scale ethnic cleansing, saw more than 700,000 Palestinians lose their ancestral homes. Hundreds of Arab villages razed to the ground and 15,000 Palestinians  killed in several massacres. Much of these events took place whilst streets of Palestine were still being patrolled by tens of thousands of British soldiers.
To this day, there are more than 5 million Palestinian refugees registered with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in the occupied Palestinian territories, Lebanon and Jordan as a result of the Nakba in 1948 and the displacement that followed the Israeli occupation of Palestine in 1967.
Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem have now been under occupation for over 50 years, devastating the lives of millions of Palestinians.
The catastrophe of the Arab Palestinian people in 1948 continues today at the hands of Israel, using the same old policies and laws established by the British such as land confiscation laws, home demolitions, ‘administrative’ detention, deportations, violent repression, and the continuation of the expulsion of about 7.9 million Palestinians who are denied their basic national and human rights, especially their right to return and live normally in their homeland. Today, the State of Israel, backed by the military and diplomatic might of the United States, continues this century-long pattern of denying the Palestinian people their right to self-determination. In violation of international law, Israel refuses to allow Palestinian refugees their right of return to the homes from which they or their ancestors were forcibly displaced by Israel during the Nakba in 1948; denies Palestinian citizens of Israel their equal rights; and imposes upon Palestinians in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip a brutal military occupation and suffocating siege. that is currently facing  what amounts to genocide. This catastrophe of the Palestinian people could not continue without the support of Israel by the United States and Britain.
In the June 1967 war, Israel completed the conquest of Palestine by occupying the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. By signing the Oslo Accord with Israel in 1993, the Palestine Liberation Organisation gave up its claim to 78% of Palestine. In return they hoped to achieve an independent Palestinian state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with a capital city in East Jerusalem. It was not to be.
 On May 7, The Guardian newspaper regretted its support in 1917 for the Balfour Declaration, describing it as its “worst errors of judgment”.
The Guardian of 1917 supported, celebrated, and could even be said to have helped facilitate the Balfour Declaration,” the British daily wrote, adding that the then editor, CP Scott, was “blinded” to Palestinian rights due to his support of Zionism.
The Balfour Declaration is not just history, it's actuality. The Palestinian people still experience this declaration's catastrophic consequences to this day, which bear witness to such a historic injustice due to the persecution, repression, killing, arrests and demolition of homes and properties. that perpetuated one of the longest-running settler-colonial occupations on a land that was and remains exclusively Palestinian.
This painful anniversary coincides with the ongoing crises in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, especially in the Gaza Strip, which is witnessing the escalation of killings, organized terrorism, displacement, and the deliberate destruction of residential buildings, schools, hospitals, places of worship, and infrastructure. The occupying army continues to commit one massacre after another without any accountability. Just today they destroyed an entire neighborhood in the Bureij camp over the heads of its residents! 
These actions constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by the Israeli occupation. Unfortunately, it highlights the failure of the international community to carry out its duties and assume its responsibilities in putting an end to this Israeli military aggression, providing protection for the Palestinian people, and obliging Israel, the occupying power, to comply with the principles of international law and relevant United Nations resolutions
It is important to note that the UK is currently assisting and providing cover for a second Nakba in which thousands of palestinians killed with the whole world watching one of Balfour's most terrible results. And of all of the nations to stand by and watch, it shouldn't be ours. Britain has played a role in creating this cycle of killing and bloodshed in the middle east. Our country, the former colonial power is jointly responsible for the disaster of the Balfour declaration, and is fully accountable to the atrocities and dehumanizing of Palestinians. But even till this day, the UK has not shown any remorse for the historical sin it had made.
Britain bears a moral and historical responsibility over the displacement and dispossession of millions of Palestinians and should therefore make every possible effort to remedy the wounds inflicted upon the Palestinians as a result of the Balfour Declaration by apologizing to the Palestinian people, and recognizing the Palestinian state on the June 4, lines with East Jerusalem as its capital in support of achieving a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in accordance with the vision of a two-state solution to ensure that future generations of Palestinians can live in dignity.The Israeli occupation should be brought to an end and Israel should be held accountable for its war crimes and crimes against humanity. Short term we should demand an immediate ceasefire.The war must be stopped, and civilians protected. 

Tuesday, 31 October 2023

'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.'

 

At a time when expressions of support for the Palestinian cause are facing criminalisation at utterly unprecedented levels across Europe Witnessing  extraordinary restrictions being imposed on virtually all expressions of solidarity: Palestinian flags and kuffiyeh scarves are being banned and protest rallies are being systematically prohibited. I draw attention to the slogan “From the river to the sea.Palestine will be free  ” a  refrain that can regularly be heard :at pro-Palestine rallies across the world.
For Palestinians and pro-Palestinian campaigners.the phrase has been a popular rallying call for decades, signifying what they believe is their right to peacefully return to the land that is now Israel. About 700,000 Palestinians, approximately 85% of the Arab population, were expelled or forced to flee in 1948, when Israel declared independence after the United Nations voted to divide Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. In the 1967 war, Israel expanded the territory under its control and has since occupied the Gaza Strip and West Bank. It has blockaded Gaza since 2007, after Hamas took control of the strip.  
But the phrase has been the subject of global controversy, with some seeing it as antisemitic or even dangerous, especially after it was adopted by Hamas..Many Israelis and supporters of Israel have claimed that the chant effectively calls for genocide and implies the destruction of Israel.  In mid-October, police in Vienna banned a pro-Palestine protest on the basis of the chant, claiming it was a call to violence.  And while London's Metropolitan Police said they would not be arresting protesters who chanted the slogan at a pro-Palestine protest over the weekend, the UK Home Secretary has publicly stated that she believes police should intervene, suggesting that the chant is an "expression of a violent desire to see Israel erased from the world" and recently called the slogan a “staple of antisemitic discourse.”, 
Despite the slogans controversy, the origins of which go back to the 1940s. The chant the river refers to is the Jordan River which lies to the east of the West Bank and Israel while the sea is the Mediterranean Sea, on the west. The area in between consists of 7 million Palestinians who live under Israeli rule.  The entire land between the river and the sea used to be historically Palestine.  Upon the conclusion of the British Empire’s mandate over historic Palestine, the United Nations put forth a proposal to divide the region into separate Jewish and Palestinian states. The plan, which saw 62 per cent of land going under Israeli control, was rejected by Arab leaders. 
Once the British left, the Nakba, or “cataophophe” took place that resulted in more than 700,000 Palestinians being displaced. In 1964, the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) was formed with the aim of representing the Palestinian people and their national aspirations..In the late 1960s, the PLO put forward a visionary idea of Arab-Jewish coexistence in one democracy, arguing for Israel and the Occupied Territories to become “one secular, democratic state of Palestine” based on one person, one vote, where Arabs, Jews, Muslims and Christians would enjoy full equality.
The chant  refers to and  acknowledges the fact that nowhere between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean sea .do Palestinians enjoy full and equal rights, and the slogan means that Palestinians will be free one day to go back to their homes and lands that were stolen from them during the Nakba. They will be free again and not prisoners.
The outrageous and deeply inflammatory intervention from Suella Braverman. offers no help whatsoever to the tragic currently unfolding in Gaza.Yes. ' From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.' is a call for the end of the ethno-supremacist state of Israel but no, it is  not a call for the death or suffering of any Jewish person.Calling for an end to this oppressive system is not antisemitic, rather it is an invitation for Palestinians and Jews alike to imagine themselves as free and equal in this land, liberated from the oppressive power relations that prevail today. Rather than criminalizing the slogan, the British government should be working toward this aspirational future. And the first step is recognizing the present reality for what it is.. Palestinians wanting an end to the occupation is not anti semitic and people supporting Palestinians  currently facing genocide is not antisemitism and expressing solidarity with Palestinians is not hateful.    
'“From the river to the sea represents a political manifesto increasingly recognised around the world: justice for all Palestinians in historic Palestine and in exile. and also' means that Palestinians will be free to live in all of modern Israel, Gaza and West Bank. in freedom and equality/ No different from what Israeli Jews want. So, a a unitary state with equal rights in Palestine-Israel is the obvious compromise. Unless one side refuses to share,
In these  perilous times in Israel-Palestine. with Israel’s retaliatory bombing of Gaza  wreaking destruction on the already besieged strip and killing a ballooning number of civilians. Emboldened settlers in the West Bank, backed by the army, are seizing the opportunity to escalate their attacks on Palestinians., '“From the river to the sea”serves to remind us of  the fragmentation of Palestinian land and people by Israeli occupation and discrimination. who  since 1948 have been divided in a myriad of ways by Israeli apartheid policy.
There are Palestinian refugees denied repatriation because of discriminatory Israeli laws.There are Palestinians denied equal rights living within Israel’s internationally recognized territory as second-class citizens. There are Palestinians living with no citizenship rights under Israeli military occupation in the West Bank. There are Palestinians in legal limbo in occupied Jerusalem and facing expulsion. There are Palestinians in Gaza living under an Israeli siege. All of them suffer from a range of policies in a singular system of discrimination and apartheid, a system that can only be challenged by their unified opposition. All of them have a right to live freely in the land  liberated from all  forms of occupation discrimination, and oppression,  from the river to the sea.

Saturday, 28 October 2023

Beyond the Storms

 


In these maddening days
Paths of confusion and disorientation,
Somber times of  utter sadness
Hopes blighted instead of gladness,
As bombs fall with a litany of despair
Forces of oppression, releasing depression,
Triggering tears and so much pain
Leaving minds brimming with anxiety,.
There are many lessons to be taught
Places to escape to in mind and spirit,
Following musical trails, other voices
Oceans of sound, offering surrender,
Where we can be wild and free 
Can't be controlled or destroyed,
Avenues where peace can be inhaled
Enabling us to laugh together,
With woven vines of passion
For complications to leap forward,
Through slivers of nature's dewdrops
Beyond the missiles and the bullets,
Allowing miracles to keep unfolding
Offering respite, calm and healing, 
Quintessence to be delivered
Cancelling out menace and injustice,
Releasing an anarchy of love
That keeps refusing to be tamed.


Thursday, 19 October 2023

Vigil for Peace in Gaza


A vigil with candles and placards will be held on Saturday from 4 pm to 6 pm by Cambrian Quay Cardigan near the Otter to grieve for those affected by the recent conflict in Gaza, to allow our community to symbolically come together and peacefully take a moment in time to collectively grieve for all civilians that have died in Israel and in Gaza, and to hope for a peaceful resolution as soon as possible. 
Stressing that the violence in Israel which caused civilian casualties is not excusable, while acknowledging that this happened in the context of the decades-long oppression of Palestinians.
It is difficult to comprehend the horror to which so many civilians have been subjected to in recent days, and I fear for the fate of those caught up in the conflict. I am also concerned about the impact that the situation is having on those of Israeli and Palestinian heritage living in Wales. 
We must  condemn the attacks by Hamas. The taking of innocent lives, and the barbarity with which civilians have been treated can never be justified, and support calls for the international community to intervene so as to impose a ceasefire so that humanitarian aid can flow into Gaza and for the hostages held by Hamas to be released. 
Ordinary Palestinians have been let down by the international community and have suffered years of violence and injustice. Collective punishment of innocent civilians cannot be justified and will do nothing to bring about peace in the region.
More than 1 million Palestinians have been displaced, and the Israeli military under Netanyahu's extreme party continues to bomb and starve millions of people trapped in Gaza. So many deaths and so much violence with no clear end.  We must demand a ceasefire in Israel and occupied Palestine. We cannot be complicit in this violence. 
But our government’s leaders continue to dehumanize Palestinians and encourage the Israeli military’s relentless bombing of Gaza. We must do everything we can to bring all families home safely, and to protect everyone in the region no matter their faiths or ethnicities.
As Israel’s brutal assault on besieged the Gaza Strip continues, our political leaders are enabling its war crimes. We must put pressure on all politicians to speak out, it is clear that a ceasefire and an end to the siege in Gaza is the only way to guarantee that there is no further loss of civilian lives and that aid reaches those who need it. All are welcome. Heddwch/ Peace.

Friday, 13 October 2023

Crying out for Succour



As the future is submerged with despair
Forces of disarray tearing each other apart,
Deteriorating. degrading and destroying
Delivering blossoming grief, so suffocating,
With two countries.side by side suffering 
One far more, with daily iniquity and cruelty,
While bombs rain down with twisted agony
Creating so much sadness and brutality,
Out of the bowels of malevolence and carnage 
There is a pallid light struggling to shine,
Carried  through the continuing darkness 
To infiltrate broken minds and hearts,
In these times of sadness and madness
Pain numbing deep inside, instead of gladness,
Let our poems keep on delivering illumination
In orange and bronze, at least autumn has arrived,
Allow things of goodness continue to inspire
From the tiniest bug to this beautiful planet itself,
Everything is tied together by the thread of life
We must use this to embroider carefully,
Among life's cruelty allow love to sustain
To distinguish and vaporise the pain,
Against the rages and ravages of war 
Under the stars and guiding moonlight
Empower voices to be used for peacefulness ·
Fill your soul and mentality with tenderness,
Breathing in silence, realise all life is precious
Sparkling with countless harmonious grace,
At daybreak the hourglass releases tiny diamonds
Beyond  prisms of blackness, sparkling in abundance,
Cycles of smiles and laughter, scattering all the hate
Enabling  hope to rise, before it's too bloody late.


Wednesday, 11 October 2023

Call for Immediate Ceasefire in Gaza Now


As of this morning, at least 2,200 Israelis and Palestinians have been killed and many thousands wounded.  Usually, when a war breaks out in Israel/Palestine, the United States quickly calls for restraint. But yesterday when Biden spoke, instead of calling for a ceasefire, he pledged U.S. involvement in Israel's pursuit of revenge and intention (already underway) to commit war crimes.The first shipment of U.S. weapons and the USS Gerald R. Ford, the world's largest warship, have already entered the fight. Biden and Congress are planning to provide additional funding for Israel's military.  
I'm absolutely astonished at the number of people who don't know that Israel has been occupying Palestine since 1948 in breach of international law. An average of 10,000 Palestinians are killed or injured by Israel every year, including hundreds of children, and what's becoming abundantly clear is a huge section of the western world not only supports this, but wants more bloodshed.
It's truly chilling. All violence is  abohrent. so is apartheid. Gaza’s 2+ million population are mostly children, who live under blockade in what Israel’s own former intelligence chief has called an open air prison. The overwhelming majority live in poverty. Many suffer lifelong psychological and physical trauma. Egypt has closed its border crossing with Gaza, Palestine. Israel has closed its border crossing with Gaza, Water turned off and today the Gaza Energy Authority announced that it  had run out of fuel. Gaza's sole power plant will stop working at 2pm local time. Soon all services vital for the survival of the population, including hospitals, will no longer function. Hamas is not the people of Palestine. Real people are living this. It's utterly heartbreaking.
Whatever is left of their hospital system is about to collapse entirely. With over a 1000 dead (hundreds being children), the wounded now have no treatment and aid has been shut off from all directions. Without electricity, the few voices from the ground will also disappear. What little remains of the now cut off water supply will dry up.
The power crisis is unfolding against a backdrop of escalated military actions, with both sides suffering casualties.The residents of Gaza are finding themselves amidst a worsening humanitarian situation, with the electricity cut-off adding to the difficulties .
The situation in Palestine-Israel is growing more and more dangerous, with total casualties now in the thousands. The situation is now so dire that some are warning of potential genocide in Gaza.
International agencies and humanitarian groups are calling for the restoration of electricity and the establishment of aid corridors to ensure the delivery of essential supplies and services. The situation highlights the complexities and the ripple effects of the ongoing conflict on basic amenities like power.  As the hostilities continue, the power cut-off in Gaza stands as a stark reminder of the far-reaching implications of military confrontations. The current scenario underlines the necessity for de-escalation and dialogue to address the humanitarian challenges and work towards a sustainable resolution of the conflict.
Violence leads to violence. Hamas’s attack was appalling, but so is the daily violence of Israeli apartheid. Israeli forces are carrying out relentless attacks reducing entire neighborhoods to rubble.at least 950 people have been killed, many more are trapped under the rubble. As the death toll mounts, we  must urge Israeli forces to make every effort to spare civilian lives. 
The brutality of Israel’s response is already clear and  now despairingly Keir Starmer is cheering on the cutting off of food, electricity, water and medical aid to Gaza. Intentionally starving civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to survival, such as drinking water. 
Under 4th Geneva Convention collective punishment is a war crime. 1,000,000 children in Gaza. Indiscriminate bombing and starving Palestinians of food, water and electricity is collective punishment. 
But instead of condemning these war crimes, Western politicians are cheering them on. It should not be controversial to oppose the killing of both Palestinian and Israeli children. It should not be controversial to oppose war crimes.No government should be endorsed to deliver collective punishment to innocents and cut off power and water to hospitals.  You can't utter these words and then call for international law to be maintained in the same sentence. It's unethical, immoral and disgusting.
Should Starmer as a former human rights lawyer. simply not be  horrified by the appalling toll of civilian deaths in  the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Israel and be calling for a ceasefire an an end of all hostilities, the protection of civilians, and a just resolution in accordance with international law!
There is no military solution to this conflict. No amount of bombing, no ground invasion, no height of collective punishment, will make anyone safer anywhere between the river and the sea.
Gaza, an open-air prison, under blockade and siege for 16 years, is at a breaking point. Medical personnel and aid workers are facing huge barriers to delivering desperately needed supplies to the over two million who are trapped there. We need a humanitarian corridor into Gaza to protect civilian lives.  Palestinians have the right to live in dignity and peace, the right to movement, and as refugees, the right of return.
The Israel-Palestine issue is not complicated; an apartheid regime abuses and oppresses an indigenous ethnic group who don't have the same rights as others. The only reason anyone thinks it's complicated is because they assume if it were simple, the news would've told them so.
The Palestinian flag by the way is a symbol of struggle, suffering and survival against tyranny. It is a symbol of hope for a better future, one of freedom and peace.Waving that is a statement of solidarity.
We should all mourn the hundreds of people killed across Israel and Palestine over the past few days and we need a concerted effort for peace and justice in the region.We need urgent de-escalation, an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the establishment of a dialogue to restore the historical rights of the Palestinian people and negotiation towards a free Palestine and  to an end of occupation and siege in order to end this tragic cycle of violence and a means in achieving a just and lasting peace.

Monday, 9 October 2023

Remembering Loukanikos : Symbol of anti-austerity resistance


Loukanikos,  a  much loved ginger mongrel  known internationally  as the 'Riot Dog'  died peacefully in his sleep on 9 October 2014, aged around 10. His name translated into English as 'sausage'. More than just a dog, he was a protector and a beloved comrade facing down riot Police daily as demonstrators took to the streets  of Greece against the police murder of Alexandros Grigoropoulos, a 15 year old Greek student  who was gunned down in cold blood in the center of Athens, and later against austerity measures.
His presence on the "front lines" of anti-austerity protests in Athens became one of the defining images of the crisis. Throughout the 2011 protests, the mongrel was a constant feature on Athens' streets - barking at riot police, narrowly avoiding being kicked in scuffles, and trotting past blazing missiles thrown by the demonstrators.  
Loukanikos, was usually  to be found at the thick of all the action in front of the crowds, charging and yelping alongside protestors when they confronted  police on the streets of Athens The canine became a symbol of resistance in Greece after he was pictured facing off with riot police and surrounded by tear gas during various demonstrations. 
Protesters said he would often stand with them during bouts of unrest and protect people by grabbing tear gas canisters and pushing them away..And in this way, Loukanikos became a symbol of urban revolution in Athens and a mascot for the protestors inspiring so many to keep up the struggle.in Greece and around the world.
So legendary was this noble creature that he had a bar named after him in Madrid, and. in 2011 Time magazine listed  Loukanikos as one of its personalities of the year.
Loukanikos  retired from h which explains his death at 10 years of age.is duty as professional protester in summer 2012. The family in charge of him had considered it was too dangerous for him to continue taking part in protests and clashes with riot police As it turns out, the chemicals and the beatings he had taken by the police on more than one occasion had damaged his health.
This valiant defender His system had been damaged by tear gas and policemen kicks, and he had been greatly weakened, which explains his death at 10 years of age. Loukanikos now rests under the shade of a tree, atop a hill in Athens. . Let's continue to remember this  courageous four legged revolutionary and symbol of anti-austerity resistance,
The following song  "Riot Dog," was written in his honour by American singer David Rovics.

David Rovics - Riot Dog


Wednesday, 4 October 2023

Here be Monsters



Heinous creatures pretending to be human
Snakes in disguise. scattering their poison,
Self absorbed. peddlers of division
Vampiric entities treating all with derision,
Killing the country. spreading cruelty and hatred
Releasing narratives of calculated debasement,
With a cockney rhymimg chancellor Jeremy Hunt 
Alongside racist Suella Braverman, what an affront,.
Like a horror show unfurling before our eyes
Collectively in rancid sickness,spreading lies,
Lining their own pockets. reeking of depravity
While forcing the vulnerable into further poverty;
With wickedness perpetrate deeds of unreason
It is after all their parties conference season,
All together turn into a hideous nightmare
Dark fibrillating hearts of total despair. 
The Tories are crooks, thieves and swindlers
Just like the witch Thatcher, their evil goddess, 
As they continue to  release extreme rhetoric
We witness the wreckage of Tory's sociopathic,
Fickless.brimming with hateful hollowness
Battering the electorate with facile bollocks.


Saturday, 30 September 2023

Remembering Muhammad al-Durrah, 23 years on

 

Today marks the 23rd anniversary of the deliberate killing of Mohammed Al-Durrah, a Palestinian child. While he was hiding in his father's arms pleading for their lives, the Israeli occupation forces shot him two days after the Al-Aqsa Intifada began..I remember him and the 1000s of  other Palestinians killed by an occupying force as the world watches.
On September 30th 2000 Mohammed Al  Durrah and his father were filmed crouching behind a concrete block along one of Gaza streets as Israeli army soldiers showered them with heavy gunfire. Moments later, the terrorized boy collapsed dead on his father’s lap whose attempts to shield his son from live ammunition proved to be futile.
This incident became one of the most evocative events of the occupation and haunting images of the intifada. Jamal al-Durrah and his 12-year-old son, Mohammad, were filmed by Talal Abu Rahma, a Palestinian cameraman freelancing for France 2, they are seen with their, backs pressed against the wall, Jamal’s arm attempting to shield his young son whose mouth is oval with what must have been a paralyzing fear. And then the shots. After an emotional public funeral, the 12 year old became a symbol of the struggle of the Palestinian people against a ruthless occupier.
Jamal al-Durrah , who was also badly wounded, said his son died for “the sake of Al-Aqsa Mosque.” His mother Amal added, “My son didn’t die in vain. This was his sacrifice for our homeland, for Palestine.” 
As the BBC reported at the time: “For 45 minutes, Mohammed’s father tried in vain to shield him from gunfire as they crouched against a concrete wall near Netzarim in the Gaza Strip. The boy’s father waved desperately to Israeli troops, shouting: “Don’t shoot.
After initially taking responsibility for killing Mohammad, a bogus Israeli army investigation concluded that the killing of Mohammad was a hoax, that Palestinians were to blame, that the France 2 journalist who shot the video was part of a conspiracy to ‘delegitimise Israel’.The Prime Minister’s office released a document  officially denying Israel’s responsibility for the death and stating that the 
footage was staged.But the boy did die in conflict and his own father could not save him.In 2013, a French court vindicated Abu Rahma and France 2 after they were accused of staging the video,.
Abu  Rahmeh told the Al-Monitor news website that his French employer had posted on YouTube the entire raw video to put an end to attempts to discredit him through claims that the footage was staged.
The footage of al-Durrah was popular because it captured human emotion, he said: “It moved the world and whoever saw it because it reflected a real human emotion of a father unable to protect his young son.”
Abu Rahma, who has won numerous awards for his work, including the Rory Peck Award in 2001, is now based in Greece, where he, his wife and nine year-old son are residents. He works between there and Amman, Jordan. He has been banned from returning to Gaza since 201
Here is a report by the Guardian newspaper on the case:-


Thousands of other Palestinian civilians died too and he symbolized their plight. The footage, became the most potent symbol of the Palestinian resistance against the decades-long Israeli occupation.Drawings and pictures of the scene were painted on walls across many parts of the world in support of the Palestinian cause.
The fact remains that Israeli soldiers still do kill little Palestinian boys on a regular basis,with impunity sometimes just for throwing rocks. Human rights groups’ reports are never short on distressing details: 954 Palestinian children were killed between the Second Intifada in 2000 and Israel’s war on Gaza, the so-called Operation Cast Lead in 2008. In the latter war alone, 345 children were reportedly killed.
Palestinian children  live a reality of apartheid and structural violence, where they could be gunned down at any time without any serious prospect of accountability killed by an occupying force as the world watches
Years years later, we should remember this terrified boy, remember his name and all the other innocents since trapped in the fogs of war and occupation.
In Gaza, the protracted humanitarian protection crisis continues to have a significant impact on the well-being of children and families. Successive conflicts have resulted in thousands of deaths, created high levels of psychosocial distress, and eroded public infrastructure. To date, the international community has failed to ensure proper protection of Palestinian children from the political violence of the Israeli government and settlers. 
Israeli military's continuous offensives and its complete disregard for international law have frustrated any meaningful efforts toward implementing comprehensive protections for Palestinian children. Children remain the most vulnerable and are paying the heaviest price of the conflict. They must be protected from violence, exploitation and grave violations and the international community must demand an end to Israel’s illegal military assaults and systemic impunity by investigating allegations of war crimes and holding the perpetrators accountable.

Friday, 29 September 2023

Stop all the clocks - WH Auden (21 February 1907 – 29 September 1973)



Wystan Hugh Auden was born in York, England on 21 February 1907 the third son of a successful  doctor and a missionary nurse, he grew up in Solihull and described his early advantages as 'good genes and good education'.
WH Auden was a uniquely modern poet and one who speaks unmistakably to our modern times. He came of age at a moment when the intellectual elites of Europe were in tumult over the rise of dictators across the continent, and was one of the few writers to come out of the period alive in body and soul. His politics formed an intrinsic part of his writing, and were the basis on which Auden’s hatred of totalitarianism and demand for total intellectual freedom, were founded.
He was the bright young thing of dour, embittered thirties Britain, a man whose image and writings brought the best out of him and the worst out of others. Auden’s genius to put the most complex of literary and political emotions into the most simple, elegiac verse.
He received a public education, first at St Edmund's Hindhood and then at Gresham's School, Holt in Norfolk. In 1925 he entered Christ Church, Oxford University where he studied English literature.It was during his time at Oxford that he formed an association with a group of young literary intellectuals including Stephen Spender, Christopher Isherwood, C. Day Lewis and Louis MacNeice.
After graduation in 1928, Auden spent almost 12 months in Berlin. Like Isherwood and Spender, part of the attraction of going to Berlin for Auden was to enjoy the city’s tolerant attitude towards homosexuality. He initially lodged with family connections in an affluent but semi-rural setting at Potsdamer Chausse 40, by the Wannsee; but he soon moved to the much shabbier working-class district of Kreuzberg, where he was freer and closer to the city’s famous gay nightlife. Auden’s new place in Fürbingerstraße 8 was, in fact, down the road from the Cosy Corner, to which Auden introduced Isherwood on his first visit. In Berlin, Auden met the English anthropologist John Layard, through whom he became acquainted with the theories of the American psychologist Homer Lane, who argued that repression was the cause of physical illness. 
Although Auden wrote no poem or text that was strictly about Berlin, his experiences in the city caused two important transformations that had a deep impact on his writing: he became aware of social injustice and he embraced his homosexual identity with gusto. 
By the early 1930s he had emerged as the pre-eminent figure in a group of young writers who boldly asserted that they could speak for the inter-war generation.Strongly influenced by Freudian Psychoanalysis, his studies in anthropology, and by left-wing political ideologies, Auden was strongly anti-Romantic and rejected existing literary conventions and the need to fit his poetry to any particular style. 
Rather, he forged a reputation as a virtuoso exhibiting an enormous range of technique and form in his works, variously employing sonnets, ballads and numerous strict, metered patterns of his own devising.  His use of the vernacular, mixed syntax and his own special vocabulary mark his earlier work, although they are curbed somewhat in his later pieces
Auden made his reputation in the intensely political ‘30s, when it was hard for the most reluctant to avoid political involvement. And early on in his career he showed his inclination towards the left wing, which was against the rise of dictatorship in Europe. He even served as stretcher-bearer for the Republicans during the Spanish Civil War. His achievement as a poet lies in the fact that with his poetry he managed to implicate with utmost sensitivity the altering moods and opinions of his time. 
His first volume of poems was published in 1930. the collection is political in nature and his attitude towards poetry remained such till the end of WWII.
Although gay, Auden married  Erika Mann in 1935 to enable her to escape persecution in Nazi Germany.Before the war broke out in 1939 Auden and Christopher Isherwood left Europe for America. He had earlier collaborated with Isherwood to write the stage play The Dog Beneath the Skin. This move provoked the ire of many belonging to his country’s literary circles.
In 1939, Auden fell in love with Chester Kallman and regarded their relationship as a marriage, but this ended in 1941 when Kallman refused to accept the faithful relations that Auden demanded. However, the two maintained their friendship, and from 1947 until Auden's death they lived in the same house or apartment in a non-sexual relationship, often collaborating on opera libretti such as that of The Rake's Progress, (1951) to music by Igor Stravinsky. Auden was a prolific writer of prose essays and reviews on literary, political, psychological, and religious subjects, and he worked at various times on documentary films, poetic plays, and other forms of performance.
Stop all the clocks. WH Auden  Auden settled in New York but never entirely severed connections with Britain, especially Oxford, where he was professor of poetry from 1956 to 1961. Auden continued to publish volumes of new poetry, among them Another Time (1940), For the Time Being (1944), The Age of Anxiety (1947, which was awarded a Pulitzer Prize), Nones (1951), The Shield of Achilles (1956), Homage to Clio (1960), and City Without Walls (1969). He also collaborated with Hans Werner Henze's Elegy for Young Lovers (1961).
His selections from the writings of Kierkegaard (1952, 1955) are indicative of the way his thought turned away from the Marxist preoccupations of the 1930s to a kind of Christian existentialism. He also edited several anthologies, wrote critical essays, and made a number of translations. In 1966 he published his Collected Shorter Poems 1927–57 and two years later his Collected Longer Poems.
In 1951, shortly before the two British spies Guy Burgess and Donald Maclean fled to the USSR, Burgess attempted to phone Auden to arrange a vacation visit to Ischia that he had earlier discussed with Auden; Auden never returned the call and had no further contact with either spy, but a media frenzy ensued in which his name was mistakenly associated with their escape. The frenzy was repeated when the MI5 documents on the incident were released in 2007.
In 1956 Auden was appointed Professor of Poetry at Oxford University.  Auden died in his sleep of a heart attack on September 28 1973, after a poetry reading to the Austrian Society of Literature in Vienna; he was 66 years old.  His funeral was held at Kirchstetten on the 14th October and drew mourners from Britain and the United States. The procession to the church was led by Chester Kallman who died two years later in Athens.  Auden is commemorated with a plaque in 'Poets' Corner', Westminster Abbey, London.  One of the poems from Twelve Songs (sometimes known as Funeral Blues) was famously featured in the film Four Weddings and a Funeral.
Throughout his career he was both controversial and influential, and critical views on his work ranged from sharply dismissive. treating him as a lesser figure than W. B. Yeats and T. S. Eliot.to strongly affirmative, as in Joseph Brodsky's statement that he had "the greatest mind of the twentieth century". After his death, his poems became known to a much wider public than during his lifetime through films, broadcasts, and popular media and is regarded by many critics as one of the greatest writers of the 20th century.

Stop all the clocks - WH Aiden.

 Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
 Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
 Silence the pianos and with muffled drum 
 Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come. 

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead  
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves. 

He was my North, my South, my East and West, 
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood;
For nothing now can ever come to any good. 

Here's a link to the Auden Society


Wednesday, 27 September 2023

Refugees Not Criminals : A message for Suella Braverman.

 

 Suella Braverman is a sick, self-loathing, hateful excuse for a human being.  whose words do not represent me or for most of the United Kingdom  She is a far right fascist who wants to close the country and  scrap the ECHR for us here.
In her speech in Washington  yesterday she said that people don’t deserve asylum “simply for being gay, or a woman, and fearful of discrimination.”  
She is in my opinion  an incompetent dangerous rabid racist who  represents  only a small minority of right-wing bigots. What she said was utterly disgusting in its calculated cruelty. She is making a case deliberately designed to appeal to homophobic, racist arseholes simply to advance her own career. Shameless and barbaric.
Her latest ill-thought out and extreme right-wing idea is to persuade world leaders to rip up the 70-year-old U.N. Refugee Convention and to rewrite ' it to ensure refugee rules are fit for the ‘modern age’. What this is really about of course is the fury of right-wing Tory MPs at the UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency, after it ruled that the UK government’s plan to send those who come into the UK illegally to Rwanda or a third country was “incompatible with the letter and spirit” of the convention. 
If the Tory Party can’t get its way, then the self-proclaimed party of law and order wants to do away with treaties and conventions designed to protect human rights, reducing Britain’s standing in the world just so that it can please its reactionary and right-wing base. 
The Refugee Convention is the cornerstone of international refugee protection and remains a life-saving instrument that ensures millions of people fleeing conflict and persecution each year can access safety and protection across borders.
The UN Refugee Convention was agreed in the wake of World War 2 and the Holocaust to guarantee refugee rights. It’s protected people for seven decades. But now Suella Braverman thinks it’s “not fit for purpose” because it’s at odds with the government’s cruel policies.  
This is just another example of this government's dangerous rhetoric. Scapegoating and fearmongering does huge damage to people and our society They at the end of the day want to overturn recognised principles of human decency that we should all be proud of.. But together, we can stand firm in our belief in compassion, and never let powerful forces pedal hate/ We must reject the Home Secretary's dangerous and divisive rhetoric  Threats to tear up international laws designed to protect people  fleeing persecution, incl LGBTQ+ people and women fearing for their lives, undermine our human rights and values we hold dear. must not go unchallenged. 
As the Refugee Council’s Enver Solomon put it: “After the horror of the Second World War, the international community chose to stand up for those principles which are just as important today as they have ever been. Abandoning them is not an option.
The UN has responded to  Braverman's rivers of blood speech by basically  calling her a fascist and saying that the UK's asylum problem is due to her own incompetence and refusal to deal with it. And if multiculturalism has failed how the hell did Braverman get to be be bloody Home Secretary.. 
if a white Home Secretary said what she had  said he/she would have to (quite rightly) resign in disgrace, it was dangerous and toxic and  inflammatory.There's no doubt about it,  Braverman is unfit for office!We need to  focus on creating a functioning UK asylum system that tackles the backlog her policies have created,and to be able to meet the UK's limited refugee responsibilities and .need to keep  calling  out Suella Braverman's dangerous racist, homophobic lies and nonsense
 
UNHCR statement


Refugees Not Criminals

s


Saturday, 23 September 2023

To Autumn - William Blake (1783)


Today in the Northern Hemisphere, is the Autumn Equinox the point of balance between summer and winter, the time when day and night are equal, as the sun is directly over the Equator. It is the halfway point between the Winter and Summer Solstices and marks the turning point of the year.
It serves to reminds us that the long, lazy days of Summer are drawing to a close and it is time to prepare for the darker, colder months ahead.  This marks a change in our energy flow patterns, as, ideally we draw our focus more inwards and become more reflective on what the summer experiences have taught us.  
This is also the time of ‘Harvest’ – of harvesting the lessons from the summer experiences, learning what worked and what did not, what could have been done differently, what different approaches we might take next time.
The Harvest Moon' and "Hunter's Moon, are also associated with the autumnal equinox. The former is the full moon closest to the equinox and the later the one following it.
The Celts do not seem to have had a specific name for this time of year, but it has become widely known recently as Mabon, named after the character from the mabinogian, Mabon ap Modron.
In ancient times, it was vital to our survival that we knew and honoured the equinoxes. A time to pause and surrender in refection. Our disregard for the seasons and the changes they bring has rather alienated us from our roots. We need to reconnect with our seasonal rhythms, because our body still recognises them, even if we don’t! Despite its changefulness, autumn can be the stillest time of the year. Like a great pause.
William Blake's works have been used by people rebelling against a wide range of issues, such as war, conformity, and almost every kind of repression. In the present day among our own progressive idylls we can be like Blake and continue to dream of heaven on Earth, building the new Jerusalem, the new moral world and a restored Albion of free and equal imaginations.
To Autumn” from his first book, Poetical Sketches. is one in a set of four season poems by Blake, aptly including “To Winter,”To Spring,” and “To Summer.” These seasonal invocations can be read alone, but Blake also intended them to interconnect.  The cycle of the seasons is often interpreted as the cycle of rebirth and death, themes that apply to human nature as well. Each of the season songs can be read as Blake’s reference to the different stages of human life. “To Autumn” is not a particularly personal poem, but is significant in that it, along with the other seasonal songs, seems to correlate mythology that Blake created. The personas of the seasons can be read as counterparts to Blake’s spirits: Tharmas (most like spring), Orc (most like summer), Los (most like autumn), and Urizen (most like winter). Thus, “To Autumn” can be read as a particular view of human nature, or in a way which relates more to Blake’s later works.
In the poem  Blake hints at the promise of future growth. Within the harvest are the seeds for future crops. As Autumn flies over the bleak hills to make way for Winter, he leaves behind “his golden load”: an abundance of food, seeds for the Spring, and a feeling of joyous celebration, reflecting his particular view of human nature. Happy Autumn Equinox.

To Autumn - William Blake

O Autumn, laden with fruit, and stainèd
With the blood of the grape, pass not, but sit
Beneath my shady roof; there thou may’st rest,
And tune thy jolly voice to my fresh pipe,
And all the daughters of the year shall dance!
Sing now the lusty song of fruits and flowers.

The narrow bud opens her beauties to
The sun, and love runs in her thrilling veins;
Blossoms hang round the brows of
Morning, and Flourish down the bright cheek of modest Eve,
Till clust’ring Summer breaks forth into singing,
And feather’d clouds strew flowers round her head.

The spirits of the air live on the smells
Of fruit; and Joy, with pinions light, roves round
The gardens, or sits singing in the trees.“
Thus sang the jolly Autumn as he sat;
Then rose, girded himself, and o’er the bleak
Hills fled from our sight; but left his golden load.

Wednesday, 20 September 2023

Remembering Author and Activist Upton Sinclair, Jr.


Upton Beall Sinclair, Jr. American novelist, writer, socialist, anti-fascist and later Democratic candidate for governor of California, was born on September 20, 1878 in Baltimore, Maryland,  the only child of Upton Beall Sinclair and Priscilla Harden Apart from his bestselling novels, which tend to paint the realities of the United States at the turn of the century, he is remembered today for championing socialist causes that are naturally unpopular in America and for succeeding in having considerable effects on American politics and legislation. Sinclair’s socialist ideals and dreams found their way to his fiction as he believed that no art can be practiced for art’s sake as long as humanity still suffers from persistent dangers and evils. Such orientations have often subjected Sinclair to harsh criticism and even to demonization from numerous critics and politicians of his time, the most distinguished among which was probably President Theodore Roosevelt. By and large, while Sinclair eventually became an established novelist with more than one novel reaching the status of classic, he remained unsuccessful as a politician. 
Sinclair came from a family evolved from the Southern aristocracy.  His father's family had a distinguished naval tradition dating back to the Revolutionary War.  Following the Civil War and the devastation of the South, the family suffered huge economic losses.  Although Sinclair's immediate family was poor, he had wealthy grandparents in New York; so, he grew up with the unique perspective that living both in poverty and in wealth provided.  His father was a liquor salesman whose alcoholism played a major role in the son's early childhood. 
Upton was a shy, thoughtful boy who taught himself to read at age five. When Sinclair was ten, the family moved to New York, where he began writing dime novels, ethnic jokes, and pulp fiction for various magazines.
A religious child with a great love of literature, Sinclair had two great heroes.Jesus Christ and poet Percy Shelley.whom he felt influenced his life and helped him do well in school. At aged fourteen he entered New York City College. He graduated in 1897 and went to Columbia University to study law, but instead became more interested in politics and literature. He never earned a law degree. Through these years he supported himself by writing for adventure-story magazines. While attending Columbia he wrote eight thousand words a day. He also continued to read a great deal. over one two-week Christmas break he read all of William Shakespeare's (1564–1616) works as well as all of John Milton's (1608–1674) poetry. 
 Sinclair moved to Quebec, Canada, in 1900. That same year he married Meta Fuller, with whom he had a son. His first novel, Springtime and Harvest (1901), was a modest success. Three more novels in the next four years failed to provide even a bare living.
In the early 1900s, Sinclair turned to socialism after reading books such as Merrie England (Robert Blatchford), The People of the Abyss (Jack London), Appeal to the Young (Peter Kropotkin), and Octypus (Frank Norris).
Sinclair became a member of the Socialist Party in 1902, and in September, 1905, he joined with Jack London, Clarence Darrow, and Florence Kelley to form the Intercollegiate Socialist Society. The work of Frank Norris especially influenced him. He later spoke about how Norris had "showed me a new world, and he also showed me that it could be put in a novel."  Sinclair was also influenced by the investigative journalism of Benjamin Flower, Ida Tarbell, Lincoln Steffens, and Ray Stannard Baker. 
He  gained particular fame for his novel, The Jungle (1906), which was intended  to be an exposé of the poor working conditions of industrial labor. His novel became more than that. During the seven weeks that he spent in Chicago’s meatpacking plants, he witnessed the poor working conditions of immigrant laborers. He also witnessed the unsanitary practices of slaughterhouses and meatpackers. He exposed the unsafe labor and sanitary conditions and practices of the meatpacking industry, which caused a public uproar. that partly contributed to the passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act in 1906.
However, he believed that the main point of The Jungle was lost on the public, overshadowed by his descriptions of unsanitary conditions in the packing plants. The public health concerns dealt with in The Jungle were actually far less significant than the human tragedy lived by his main character and other workers in the plants. His main goal for the book was to demonstrate the inhumane conditions of the wage earner under capitalism, not to inspire public health reforms in how the packing was done. Indeed, Sinclair lamented the effect of his book and the public uproar that resulted: "I aimed at the public's heart, and by accident I hit it in the stomach."
Although President Roosevelt despised Sinclair and his socialist writings, famously calling him a “crackpot,” the phenomenal public interest in the novel seemed to force him to take it seriously and gave orders to take radical action and to investigate meat-packing factories. Nevertheless, President Roosevelt still believed that Sinclair exaggerated in his novel and called the novelist a “muckraker,” a term to be used since to describe writers and journalists who do private investigations to expose the corruption of politicians or business leaders. Sinclair was, thus, established as one of the founding fathers of investigative journalism and “muckraking,” a description of which he was proud of though he was only a writer of fiction.   
Still, the fame and fortune he gained from publishing The Jungle enabled him to write books on almost every issue of social injustice in the twentieth century.
Sinclair also established a socialist commune called Helicon Hall Colony in 1906, with proceeds from his novel The Jungle. One of those who joined was the novelist and playwright Sinclair Lewis, who worked there as a janitor. The colony burned down in 1907, apparently from arson. 
Sinclair divorced his first wife in 1913. The autobiographical (based on his own life) novel Love's Pilgrimage (1911) treats his marriage and the birth of his child with an honesty that shocked some reviewers. Sinclair married Mary Craig Kimbrough in 1913. Sylvia and Sylvia's Marriage, a massive two-part story, called for sexual enlightenment (freedom from ignorance and misinformation).
The success of The Jungle and of its adaptation into cinema in 1914 encouraged Sinclair to produce more fiction and publish numerous other stories. These included the publication of King Coal (1917), based on a coal strike of 1914 and 1915, which returned to labor protest and socialistic comment.and in 1919  The Brass Check which is probably his second most important and most influential book, though he often presented it as his number one. The Brass Check is also a muckraking work that centers on the issue of “yellow journalism” and the limitations of “free press” in the United States.  
In 1917 Sinclair left the Socialist Party to support President Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924). He returned to the socialist camp when Wilson supported intervention in the Soviet Union. In California Sinclair ran on the Socialist ticket for Congress (1920), for the Senate (1922), and for governor (1926 and 1930).   
He made his most successful run for office, this time as a Democrat. Sinclair's platform for the California gubernatorial race of 1934, known as EPIC (End Poverty in California), galvanized the support of the Democratic Party, and Sinclair gained its nomination. Conservatives in California were themselves galvanized by this, as they saw it as an attempted Communist takeover of their state and used massive political propaganda portraying Sinclair as a Communist, even as he was being portrayed by American and Soviet Communists as a capitalist following the Que Viva Mexico! debacle. Robert A. Heinlein, the science fiction author, was deeply involved in Sinclair's campaign, a point which Heinlein tried to obscure from later biographies, as Heinlein tried to keep his personal politics separate from his public image as an author. 
Sinclair was defeated by Frank F. Merriam in the election, and largely abandoned EPIC and politics to return to writing. However, the race of 1934 would become known as the first race to use modern campaign techniques like motion pictures. 
Of his gubernatorial bids, Sinclair remarked in 1951: "The American People will take Socialism, but they won't take the label. I certainly proved it in the case of EPIC. Running on the Socialist ticket I got 60,000 votes, and running on the slogan to "End Poverty in California" I got 879,000. I think we simply have to recognize the fact that our enemies have succeeded in spreading the Big Lie. There is no use attacking it by a front attack, it is much better to out-flank them." 
He has been criticized for using racial epithets in his books, but Sinclair grew up in the nineteenth century, where epithets were used to refer to people of certain ethnic backgrounds. In his books, he used these to realistically portray the way in which foreigners and minorities were referred to and treated. For example, in his book Oil!, one character uses a disparaging word to refer to non-Jewish people and a different character uses a disparaging word to refer to Jewish people. Some argue that no offense is intended or implied and that the books were written to accurately reflect the way people thought during the time. However in other books, Sinclair goes well beyond the simple use of racial epithets in quotes. For example in The Jungle, it is the narrator who describes African Americans in a highly negative light. To some, this description is meant merely to capture the mindset of the Eastern European immigrants who are the book's protagonists (a group which was itself held in low regard in America at the time). 
To others, the descriptions reflected what was possibly Sinclair's casual racist attitudes that was typical of his time. Shocking nevertheless for a man who was so passionate about  matters concerning  social justice. Although some might argue that at the time The Jungle was published, the epithets against blacks were unnoticed by both his supporters and detractors, likely these were his white supporters, as African American readers would have been offended by the epithets in a post-Plessy v. Ferguson, dawning-of-the-Jim-Crow-Era period.
It is considered erroneous to assume that if the majority classes expressed no offense at Sinclair's views, they were not offensive to his black contemporaries who had no platform on which to express their umbrage with Sinclair's portrayals of them. Nevertheless, The Jungle's impact was far-reaching.  Sinclair helped found the California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union in the 1920s.  Sinclair is well-known for his principle: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." This line has been quoted in many political books, essays, articles, and other forms of media, including Al Gore's 2006 film, An Inconvenient Truth.  He was also firmly in favor of prohibition, most 
Upton Sinclair  was a supporter of Sacco and Vanzetti and his 'documentary novel', 'Boston' (1928), was an indictment of the American system of justice set against the background of the prosecution and execution of the  two anarchists, who themselves feature as characters.
Sinclair faced what he would later call "the most difficult ethical problem of my life," when he was told in confidence by Sacco and Vanzetti's former attorney Fred Moore that they were guilty and how their alibis were supposedly arranged. However, in the letter revealing that discussion with Moore, Sinclair also wrote, "I had heard that he [Moore] was using drugs. I knew that he had parted from the defense committee after the bitterest of quarrels … Moore admitted to me that the men themselves had never admitted their guilt to him." Although this episode has been used by some to claim that Sacco and Vanzetti were guilty and that Sinclair knew that when he wrote his novel Boston, this account has been disputed by Sinclair biographer Greg Mitchell
He was also an active supporter of the Industrial Worker's of the World (the IWW) free speech campaigns and strikes and in his anthology, 'The Cry for Justice: An Anthology of the Literature of Social Protest' (1915) he collected selections from the likes of Alexander Berkman ('Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist'), Peter Kropotkin ('Memoirs of a Revolutionist'), Voltairine De Cleyre, Francisco Ferrer, Auguste Vaillant, Henry David Thoreau, Octave Mirbeau, Leo Tolstoy, etc. Sinclair wrote extensively on fascism in the 30s and 40s, both in essay and fiction form, including in 'The Flivver King: A Story of Ford-America' (1937), 'No Pasaran!: A Novel of the Battle of Madrid' (1937) and .Between 1940 and 1953 Sinclair wrote .the eleven volume Lanny Budd anti-fascist spy series  that, read in sequence, detailed much of the political history of the Western world in the first half of the twentieth century.His hero, Larry Budd, travels the world and meets such figures as Franklin Roosevelt and Adolf Hitler. In 1942, his book Dragon’s Teeth, portraying Germany’s descent into Nazism in the 1930s, won the Pulitzer Prize. 
Sinclair continued his tireless and prolific output into the second half of the century, but by the early 1960s, he had turned his attention to Mary, who was in poor health following a stroke. She passed away in 1961, and two years later, at age 83, Sinclair married for a third time, to Mary Willis. 
 Several years later, his own health caused him to move to a nursing home in Bound Brook, New Jersey. He died on November 25, 1968, at the age of 90, having written more than 90 books, 30 plays and countless other works of journalism.  His papers, photographs, and first editions of most of his books are found at the Lilly Library, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.