Thursday, 28 July 2022

Solidarity with the RMT


Solidarity to the 40,000 members of the Union of Rail, Maritime, and Transport (RMT) who took strike action yesterday. The workers taking this action include guards, signallers, maintenance and catering staff who are striking against a multipronged attack on their working conditions by Network Rail and the 14 Train Operating Companies. These including proposed £2bn of cuts to the rail system which will result in 2,500 maintenance staff and 625,000 fewer hours of maintenance, the closure of 1,000 ticket offices, and an 8% pay rise over two years at a time when the RPI rate of inflation is already running at 11.4%. The RMT is striking against policies that threaten to make the railways less safe and less viable as a system of transport, when the extreme heatwaves of last week have foregrounded the necessity of transitioning to a transport system based on public provision rather than private vehicles. They will next take strike action  on  Saturday 30 July and again on  Thursday 18 and Saturday 20 August.
This comes as wannabe Prime Minister-to-be Liz Truss pledges to restrict the fundamental right of rail workers to strike, and the introduction of new legislation that will allow companies to hire agency workers to replace strikers. These proposals will make it harder for everyone to defend themselves from companies who care more about their rates of profit than their workers and the people using their service and  is a direct attack on one of the main pillars of our democracy It’s only repressive regimes that stop people going on strike. The RMT stands firm as a beacon for all workers. A workers ability to withdraw their labour is a fundamental right.
Mick Lynch general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union, said “coordinated and synchronised industrial action” would be needed if legislation is brought in.
He went on to say the “very dangerous situation” risks taking the country back to “Victorian times”.
The comments came as strikes by members of the RMT and Transport Salaried Staffs Association crippled services on Wednesday, with only around one in five trains running and some areas having none at all.
Meanwhile, Aslef announced its members will walk out on Saturday August 13, saying train firms failed to make a pay offer to help members keep pace with increases in the cost of living.
A general strike, which can only be called by the Trades Union Congress (TUC), is when a “substantial proportion” of workers in multiple sectors refuse to work until their demands, usually around pay and working conditions, are met.
The RMT are fighting not just for themselves, but for us all: as well as their livelihoods. The safety standards of the British rail network are under real threat. The government-backed rail operators are attempting to reduce staffing levels on platforms, trains, and tracks in order to drive down wages, which they see simply as an overhead cost. Further, they intend to rehire many workers on zero-hours agency contracts in order to circumnavigate labour rights such as paid leave for holiday, sickness, and parenthood as well as allowing them to dismiss workers without notice or redundancy pay. 
The transport industry is one of the few remaining industries in Britain with high union membership. This attempt to break it up by dividing the workforce is a direct attempt to weaken the unions, and the labour movement as a whole.  On top of it all, comes a slap in the face: during this period of exaggerated cost of living,  they are offering the workers that they aren’t trying to sack a real-terms pay cut.  These cuts also come shortly after the Train Operating Companies turned a £600m profit. In 2020, the Rolling Stock Companies, who own the trains, paid out almost £1bn in dividends to their shareholders.This isn't just about the railways, it's about every one of us who's struggling while the rich get richer. 
During lockdown, many of us celebrated the key workers who kept the country going in very difficult (and often dangerous) circumstances. Those same workers are collectively organising for better pay and conditions and we should stand 100% behind them.  Rail staff work in all types of adverse weather and conditions. Most of them are enduring two to three year pay freezes. Meanwhile MPs on £84,144 a year received a £2,212 pay rise just a few months ago and a 28% pay rise since 2010,totalling £18,406. 
If the Tories want to look at pay restraint I suggest this is where they start. While Conservative Ministers and the Tory press will attempt  to demonise hard working RMT members, they should be reminded of the low standing of MP’s, CEO’s and Journalists in the public eye.
This strike is a beacon of resistance and  a victory for the RMT will mean a victory for all, who struggle for a fairer and more equal society. They have done more to fight back in the last few weeks against the derisory economic conditions so many of us face (not just for RMT members, but for us all) than any other political force active in the UK today and have emerged as pacemakers in what is being billed as the summer of discontent. 
Mick Lynch the general secretary of the RMT has been leading from the front. His union is ready to help others across the public sector to coordinate and strengthen action to pursue pay claims and defend conditions. We must never accept such an unprecedented assault on ordinary people's pay and conditions. The basic demand for decent work and a decent livelihood is an  infinitely reasonable.one and the rail strikes are entirely justified. Anyone who values public services and wants to address the climate crisis should support these strikes. 
The momentum of the union movement is growing once again in Britain after half a century of targeted assault. Public support is on the rise, and workers in unions across the country are balloting to take action and stand up for their rights and their dignity. The doubling-down on anti-union rhetoric by the government and press is evidence that they are aware of the power that a unionised workforce wields, and that they are threatened by it. The strikes have also highlighted how we need a publicly owned and democratically controlled transport system more than ever.
Despairingly Sir Keith Woodentop in the midst of all of this has in a shameful dishonourable manner sacked junior shadow transport minister Sam Tarry for daring to show solidarity with striking RMT workers.Supporting workers as they fight  for their jobs, pay and conditions is exactly what Labour is suppose to do. Lets not forget  that Trade unions formed UK Labour to become the political voice of workers and to fight for a decent standard pf life for all. Every single Labour MP should come out in solidarity with Sam Tarry, join him on the picket line and have a vote of no confidence in Starmer.
I stand in full solidarity with the members of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers I’m so appreciative of anybody that’s prepared to stand up for themselves and has the self-respect to stand up for themselves,and call up on the employers and Government Ministers to enter into meaningful negotiations with the trade union to preserve jobs, ensure decent pay and safe working conditions. Strike, fight and stay united!
You can donate to the RMT hardship fund, which helps striking members who are taking part in the dispute, via PayPal, cheque, or credit card.

Sunday, 24 July 2022

Simon Bolivar : El Libertador ( 24/7/1783 - 17/12/1830)


On July 24, 1783, Latin American revolutionary and liberator Simon Bolivar was born in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela then a Spanish Colony. During his lifetime, Bolivar became known as ‘El Libertador’ or the Liberator through  big instrumental in helping countries such as Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia all achieve independence. 
 Bolivar   to  some acted as a political dictator, but Bolívar’s commitment to republican democracy was fluid. Although he believed that a republic was the best form of government, he wasn’t confident that the people of Peru and Upper Peru were ready for a democratic form of government. He also proposed a lifetime presidency for Gran Colombia, believing it needed a strong central government. Bolívar’s own ambivalence about democracy can be seen as a forerunner of twentieth-century South American politics, where many countries have veered between democracy and dictatorship. In that way, Bolívar can be regarded more like the continent’s father,.
His family came from a long line of wealthy Spanish aristocrats and businessmen on both sides. His father, Colonel Juan Vicente Bolívar y Ponte, and his mother, Doña María de la Concepción Palacios y Blanco, inherited vast swaths of land, money, and resources. The Bolívar family fields were labored over by the Native American and African slaves that they owned.
Little Simón Bolívar was petulant and spoiled , though  in fairness he had suffered great personal  tragedy. His father died of tuberculosis when he was three, and his mother died from the same disease about six years later. Because of this, Bolívar was mostly cared for by his grandfather, aunts and uncles, and the family’s longtime slave, Hipólita. 
Hipólita was doting and patient with the mischievous Bolívar, and Bolívar unabashedly referred to her as the woman “whose milk sustained my life” and “the only father I have ever known.”
Soon after his mother died, Simón Bolívar’s grandfather passed away, too, leaving Bolívar and his older brother, Juan Vicente, to inherit the enormous fortune of one of Venezuela’s most prominent families.
His grandfather’s will appointed Bolívar’s uncle Carlos as the boy’s new guardian, but Carlos was lazy and ill-tempered, unfit to raise children or command such a mountain of wealth.
Without adult supervision, Bolívar had the freedom to do as he pleased. He subsequently ignored his studies and spent much of his time roaming around Caracas with other children his age.
At the time, Caracas was on the cusp of a serious upheaval. Twenty-six thousand more black slaves were brought to Caracas from Africa, and the city’s mixed-race population was growing as a result of the inevitable intermingling of white Spanish colonizers, black slaves, and native peoples.
There was growing racial tension in the South American colonies, since the color of one’s skin was deeply tied to one’s civil rights and social class. By the time Bolívar reached his teens, half of Venezuela’s population was descended from slaves.
Underneath all of that racial tension, a yearning for freedom began to simmer. South America was ripe for rebellion against Spanish imperialism.
Bolívar’s family, although one of the wealthiest in Venezuela, was subject to class-based discrimination as a result of being “Creole” — a term used to describe those of white Spanish descent who were born in the colonies.
By the late 1770s, Spain’s Bourbon regime had enacted several anti-Creole laws, robbing the Bolívar family of certain privileges only afforded to Spaniards born in Europe. 
Still, being born into an upper-crest family, Simón Bolívar had the luxury of travel. At age 15, the heir apparent to his family’s plantations, he went to Spain to learn about empire, commerce, and administration.
In Madrid, Bolívar first stayed with his uncles, Esteban and Pedro Palacios.
“He has absolutely no education, but he has the will and intelligence to acquire one,” Esteban wrote of his new charge. “And even though he spent quite a bit of money in transit, he landed here a complete mess….I am very fond of him.”
Bolívar wasn’t the most considerate guest, to say the least; he burned through his uncles’s modest pensions. And so he soon found a more suitable patron, the marquis of Uztáriz, another Venezuelan who became young Bolívar’s de facto tutor and father figure and taught Bolívar math, science, and philosophy.
In 1803, Simón Bolívar returned to Europe and witnessed the coronation of Napoleon Bonaparte as the King of Italy. The history-making event left a lasting impression on Bolívar and gave rise to his interest in politics. 
For three years,, with his most trusted tutor  Don Simon Rodriguez, who taught the young Bolivar about the ideals of liberty, enlightenment and freedom.He also studied the works of European political thinkers, from liberal Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke and Montesquieu to the Romantics, namely Jean-Jacques Rousseau. When he was 14, his mentor Rodriguez had to flee the country because he was under suspicion of plotting against the Spanish rulers. Bolivar entered the military academy Milicias de Veraguas, where he developed a passion for military strategy.
In 1799, he travelled to Europe to complete his education. Whilst in Madrid, he met  María Teresa Rodríguez del Toro y Alayza, a half-Spanish, half-Venezuelan woman two years Bolívar’s senior.
They had a passionate, two-year courtship in Madrid before finally getting married in 1802. The newly wed Simón Bolívar, 18 and ready to take over his rightful inheritance, returned to Venezuela with his new bride in tow.
But the quiet family life he envisioned would never become. Just six months after arriving in Venezuela, María Teresa succumbed to a fever and died.
Bolívar was devastated. Though he enjoyed many other lovers in his lifetime after María Teresa’s death,,most notably Manuela Sáenz who would later save him from an assassination attempt. María Teresa would be his only wife.
Later, the renowned general credited his career change from businessman to politician to the loss of his wife, as many years later Bolívar confided to one of his commanding generals: “If I were not widowed, my life would have maybe been different; I would not be the General Bolívar nor the Libertador….When I was with my wife, my head was filled only with the most ardent love, not with political ideas….The death of my wife placed me early in the road of politics, and caused me to follow the chariot of Mars.
Bolivar moved to Paris, where he continued to read the great enlightenment thinkers of Europe, which had an important influence on his political beliefs.Through his own unique interpretations of all of these writings, Bolívar became a Classical Republican, believing that the interests of the nation were more important than the interests or rights of the individual (hence his dictatorial leadership style later in life). He alo became enamoured of the ideals and vision of the American and French revolutions. Also, it was in Europe, that the idea of gaining independence for Latin American countries became an aspiration. He met Alexander von Humboldt who had recently spent five years in south America, he remarked to Bolivar:
I believe that your country is ready for its independence. But I can not see the man who is to achieve it.
This thought stayed with Bolivar and on a visit to Rome, at the top of Aventine Hill, he made a celebrated vow that he would not rest until his fatherland had been liberated from Spain.
Whilst in Paris he witnessed the coronation of Napoleon.. Bolivar was mostly impressed with Napoleon and felt that Latin America needed a similar strong leader. Unlike the United States, he worried that Latin America lacked the education and strength to cope with full liberty.
In 1807, Bolivar returned to Venezuela via the United States. He found that the Spanish colonies were increasingly agitating for independence. When a triumphant Napoleon deposed the Spanish Royal family from political power, people in south America saw it as an opportunity to assert their independence from Spain. Bolivar became heavily involved in the movement for independence and in 1810, he was chosen to go on a mission to Britain to seek military and financial support in their campaign for independence but his mission was a failure. He returned to Venezuela, " Let us banish fear and lay the foundation stone of American liberty. To hesitate is to perish,” he proclaimed on July 4, 1811, America’s independence day. 
Venezuela declared independence the next day but the republic would be short-lived.
Perhaps counter-intuitively, many of Venezuela’s poor and non-white people hated the republic. The nation’s constitution kept slavery and a strict racial hierarchy completely intact, and voting rights were confined to property owners. Plus, the Catholic masses resented the Enlightenment’s atheistic philosophy.
On top of public resentment toward the new order, a devastating series of earthquakes toppled Caracas and Venezuela’s coastal cities, quite literally. A massive uprising against the junta of Caracas spelled the end for the Venezuelan republic.
Simón Bolívar fled Venezuela , earning safe passage to Cartagena by turning in Francisco de Miranda to the Spanish, an act that would forever live in infamy.
From his tiny post on the Magdalena River, in the words of historian Emil Ludwig, Bolívar began “his march of liberation there and then, with his troop of two hundred half-caste Negroes and Indios…without any certainty of reinforcement, without guns…without orders.
He followed the river, recruiting along the way, taking town after town mostly without combat, and eventually gained full control of the waterway. Simón Bolívar continued his march, leaving the river basin to cross the Andes mountains to take back Venezuela.
On May 23, 1813, he entered the mountain city of Mérida, where he was greeted as El Libertador, or The Liberator.
In  what is still considered one of the most remarkable and dangerous feats in military history, Simón Bolívar marched his army over the highest peaks of the Andes, out of Venezuela and into modern-day Colombia.
It was a gruelling climb that cost many lives to bitter cold. The army lost every horse it had brought, and much of its munitions and provisions. One of Bolivar’s commanders, General Daniel O’Leary, recounted that after descending the far side of the highest summit “the men saw the mountains behind them…they swore of their own free will to conquer and die rather than retreat by the way they had come.
Bolívar also sought to unify Peru and Bolivia, which was named after the great general, into Gran Colombia through the Confederation of the Andes. But after years of political infighting, including a failed attempt on his life, Simón Bolívar’s efforts to unify the continent under a single banner government collapsed. 
With his soaring rhetoric and unflappable energy, Simón Bolívar had roused his army to survive the impossible march. O’Leary writes of the “boundless astonishment of the Spaniards when they heard that an enemy army was in the land. They simply could not believe that Bolivar had undertaken such an operation.” 
But though he had earned his stripes on the battlefield, Bolívar’s wealthy status as a white Creole at times worked against his cause, especially compared to the fierce Spanish cavalry leader named José Tomás Boves who successfully amassed support from native Venezuelans to “squelch the people of privilege, to level the classes.” 
Those loyal to Boves only saw that “the Creoles who lorded over them were rich and white…they hadn’t understood the true pyramid of oppression,” beginning at the top with imperial colonialism. Many natives were against Bolívar due to his privilege, and in spite of his efforts to liberate them. 
In December 1813, Bolívar defeated Boves in an intense battle at Araure, but “simply couldn’t recruit soldiers as quickly and effectively as [Boves],” according to biographer Marie Arana. Bolívar lost Caracas soon afterward, and fled the continent.
He went to Jamaica, where he wrote his famous political manifesto known simply as the Jamaica Letter. Then, after surviving an assassination attempt, Bolívar fled to Haiti, where he was able to raise money, arms, and volunteers.
In Haiti, he finally realized the necessity of attracting poor and black Venezuelans to his side of the fight for independence. As Cañizares-Esguerra points out, “this isn’t due to principle, it’s his pragmatism that is moving him to undo slavery.” Without the support of slaves, he had no chance of ousting the Spanish. 
In 1816, he returned to Venezuela, with support from the Haitian government, and launched a six-year campaign for independence. This time, the rules were different: All slaves would be liberated and all Spaniards would be killed.
Thus, Bolívar liberated enslaved people by destroying the social order. Tens of thousands were slaughtered and the economies of Venezuela and modern-day Colombia crumbled. But, in his eyes, it was all worth it. What mattered was that South America would be free from imperial rule.
He pushed on to Ecuador, Peru, Panama, and Bolivia (which is named after him), and dreamt of uniting his newly liberated territory, essentially all of northern and western South America ,as one massive country ruled by him. But, once again, the dream would never fully materialize.
On Aug. 7, 1819, Bolívar’s army descended the mountains and defeated a much larger, well-rested, and utterly surprised Spanish army. It was far from the final battle, but historians recognize Boyaca as the most essential victory, setting the stage for the future victories by Simón Bolívar or his subordinate generals at Carabobo, Pichincha, and Ayacucho that would finally drive the Spanish out of the Latin American western states. 
Having reflected and learned from earlier political failures, Simón Bolívar began to piece together a government. Bolívar arranged for the election of the Congress of Angostura and was declared president. Then, through the Constitution of Cúcuta, Gran Colombia was established on Sept. 7, 1821. 
 Gran Colombia was a united South American state that included the territories of modern-day Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, parts of northern Peru, western Guyana, and northwestern Brazil. 
On Jan. 30, 1830, Simón Bolívar made his last address as president of Gran Colombia in which he pled with his people to maintain the union:
Colombians! Gather around the constitutional congress. It represents the wisdom of the nation, the legitimate hope of the people, and the final point of reunion of the patriots. Its sovereign decrees will determine our lives, the happiness of the Republic, and the glory of Colombia. If dire circumstances should cause you to abandon it, there will be no health for the country, and you will drown in the ocean of anarchy, leaving as your children’s legacy nothing but crime, blood, and death.
Gran Colombia was dissolved later that year and replaced by the independent and separate republics of Venezuela, Ecuador, and New Granada. The self-governing states of South America, once a unified force under the leadership of Simón Bolívar, would be fraught with civil unrest through much of the 19th century. More than six rebellions would disrupt Bolívar’s home country of Venezuela.
As for Bolívar, the former general had planned to spend his last days in exile in Europe, but passed away before he could set sail. Simón Bolívar died of tuberculosis on Dec. 17, 1830, in the coastal city of Santa Marta in present-day Colombia . He was only 47 years old. 
Bolivar had wished to be buried in Caracas. But the new leaders of Venezuela called him a tyrant and refused his body. He was buried in Colombia, abandoned by friends and hated by enemies. Most of his enlightened reforms were soon forgotten. This rejection of the Liberator did not last long. In 1842, he was reburied in Caracas. 
Simón Bolívar is often referred to as the “George Washington of South America” because of the similarities the two great leaders shared. They were both rich, charismatic, and were key figures in the fight for freedom in the Americas. But the two were very different. 
Unlike Washington, who suffered excruciating pain from rotten dentures,” says Cañizares-Esguerra, “Bolívar kept to his death a wholesome set of teeth.
But more importantly, “Bolívar did not end his days revered and worshiped like Washington. Bolívar died on his way to self-imposed exile, despised by many.”
He thought that a single, centralized, dictatorial government was what South America needed to survive independent from European powers ,not the decentralized, democratic government of the United States. But it didn’t work.
During his lifetime, he was both revered for his firebrand rhetoric promoting a free and united Latin America, and reviled for his tyrannical proclivities. Despite his notoriety, Bolívar did have a leg up on the U.S. in at least one respect: He freed South America’s slaves nearly 50 years before Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. Jefferson wrote that “all men are created equal” while owning dozens of slaves, whereas Bolívar set all of his slaves free.
While Bolívar didn't act alone, he was clearly the catalyst and "cult of personality" behind the 19th-century liberation movement that won independence for six Latin American nations:Venezuela , Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Bolivia.
Unlike Washington, Bolívar died a failure. In 1830, deprived of his office and military commission, Bolívar was about to go into self-imposed exile when he succumbed to tuberculosis. His political enemies, then in charge of Venezuela, outlawed even the mention of his name.
And that's the way it remained until the 1870s, when a new generation of Venezuelan elites went looking for political symbols that would rally supporters to their cause. The late 19th-century Venezuelan President Antonio Guzmán Blanco  is credited with reviving the " cult of Bolivar."
Guzmán Blanco created the modern Venezuelan currency and named it the bolívar. He also built the National Pantheon of Venezuela and had Bolívar's remains reinterred in its hall of heroes.
Simón Bolívar remains the most celebrated historical figure in South America today, particularly in the countries he liberated. As a result, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the Plurinational State of Bolivia both bear his name, as do their Bolívar and Boliviano currencies as well as an endless array of parks and plazas throughout the continent and 24th July is celebrated as Simon Bolivar day across Latin America.
His fame  has continued to grow to mythical proportions and continues  to inspire millions in Latin America, especially the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez  as well as Colombian revolutionary Simon Trinidad  currently  political prisoner of the U.S held in solitary confinement in the "Guanantanemo of the Rockies" or Florence Colorado Supermax Prison. 
Bolivar maintained the fight against Spain when all appeared hopeless  and he did not give up until he had overcome all the obstacles on the road to liberation and independence, He called himself "the man of difficulties ," and in truth he was that. Bolivar's greatest political mistake was hi failure to recognise the forces of nationalism which were soon to vitalize the Latin American countries. His desire to give his world a firm and stable foundations were justified even if his methods were erroneous, Latin America has continued to foster pronunciamentos and revolutions in confirmation  of Bolivar's mot sombre apprehensions, Since Bolivar passed into history, South America  has not produced his equal. 

Saturday, 23 July 2022

Human Pawns


Save them from the kratocracy
Who pave pathways  of pain
With fruitless detours
Travelling through borders
Struggling to survive.

Equivalence rendered meaningless
Desperation on a string
Vulnerability intensified
Compassion dead
As pawns precariously placed.

Decades of deceit
Governed by monsters
Pouncing like prejudicial panthers
Pounding their prey
With poison paws.

As gills of demons
Exhale their toxins
Polluting the oxygen
New antidotal measures
Must freshen the air.

Beyond chains of division
Games that people play
That leave many consumed
The cancer of power thwarted
Tenuous grip torn from the brink.


Tuesday, 19 July 2022

It's not only a heatwave, it's a Climate Emergency

 

As of 1pm today the temperature has risen above 40C for the first time in the UK's history,  according to provisional Met Office figures. The mercury hit a record 40.2C at London Heathrow by 1pm.
The climate crisis is very real  and it's time to act. We have not seen anything like it , and we can't compare this looming heat emergency to the summer of 1976.
A warmer world is due to human induced climate change, that makes  it extremely difficult to break extreme heat thresholds, We continue to see this across the planet, not just in Europe where heat records have also been shattered in regions of Belgium, France, Netherlands and Germany, which has led to impassioned demands for governments to take more ambitious action to combat the climate crisis. Sadly a lot of people are vehemently in denial over this. But I've never seen any evidence to the contrary, the fact remains it's getting hotter and far more uncomfortable very quickly at an alarming rate of knots.. If anything , we've been far too conservative  in our estimates in our estimates of the speed, scope and severity of even moderate levels of climate change. Thousands of people have already died from this heat wave.Extreme heat is also endangering the environment and homes, with wildfires raging in Portugal, Spain and France.
British authorities have described it as a "national emergency" and southern Britain is under an “extreme” heat warning for the first time on record. We're not approaching a climate emergency, we're already in one.
Meanwhile Governments are sitting on their hands while the planet burns, None of the current Tory candidates treat the climate emergency with the seriousness it deserves instead has focused on tax cuts and culture war issues, rather than the climate.. Despite a flurry of headline-grabbing pledges, national commitments bring us nowhere near to meeting the Paris Agreement target of 1.5 degrees. According to Climate Action Tracker, 73% of existing “net-zero” pledges are weak and inadequate—“lip service to climate action.” What is more, a yawning gap remains between pledges, which are easy enough to make, and actual policies, which are all that really count. You can pledge all you like, but what we need is action. Right now existing government policies have us hurtling toward 2.7 degrees of heating in the coming decades. 
As temperatures approach 3 degrees, 30-50% of species are likely to be wiped out. More than 1.5 billion people will be displaced from their home regions. Yields of staple crops will face major decline, triggering sustained food supply disruptions globally. Much of the tropics will be rendered uninhabitable for humans. Such a world is not compatible with civilization as we know it. The status quo is a death march. Our governments are failing us,failing all of life on earth.
In light of  all of this rebels from XR have today  cracked windows at News UK and sprayed ' Tell the Truth' and ' 40 degrees =Death'; to highlight the failure of the Murdoch press to cover the heatwave and the Climate Crisis. 
The more the climate heats up  the more the public has to turn up the heat on governments. Averting climate catastrophe needs radical action now, a rapid phase out of all fossil  fuels, an end  to deforestation, and an  end to  capitalism, and the  need to  switch to a socioeconomic system that prioritizes  preserving our only home mother earth and it's biosphere for future generations.
Ultimately this means  replacing our destructive global economic system with one that offers potential for sustainability, greater fairness, and human flourishing.
Let's not forget that rich countries are responsible for the overwhelming majority of the excess emissions that are causing climate breakdown. They also have levels of energy use that are vastly higher than other countries, and vastly in excess of what is required to meet human needs, with most of the surplus being diverted to service corporate expansion and elite consumption. Zero by 2050 is a global average target. A fair-share approach would require rich countries to eliminate most fossil fuel use by no later than 2030 or 2035, to give poorer countries more time to transition.
Even in the short term, there are innumerable steps that can be taken to steer our civilization toward a life-affirming trajectory. Nature itself can be part of the solution, trees, wetlands, plants and rivers which all help to reduce air temperatures. We must invest in nature  and drastically cut emissions. Obviously all this means our lifestyles will all have to change drastically,  our overt reliance on consumerism, but it is  so necessary ,as  the stakes have never been higher, and we can't afford to wait until 2050, because by then  it will be too bloody late and we will all be fucked. We have a  choice though collective action or collective suicide.

Saturday, 16 July 2022

Tory Leadership Debate


Is it me or is the wall to wall Radio  and TV coverage of a Tory leadership election disturbing ? Why is it is being treated like a General Election with live TV debates when the electorate have absolute no power in the final decision. At the end of  the day less than 200,000 Tory members will decide who the new Prime Minister will be and then the date of the next general election, and there is nothing that we can do to stop that happening.
The irony of the Tory leadership hopefuls Rishi Sunak, Penny Mordaunt, Liz Truss, Kemi Badenoch and Tom Tugendhat  having their first debate on Channel 4 which the Tory's want to sell off seems to be lost on all of them. Who were the candidates attempting to appeal  to? It was nothing more than a crude Propaganda exercise? 
After watching the debate last night where they shared their views on taxes, the cost of living, the NHS, gender identity and more,  the only thing I have taken from it is that I have no desire to see any of these sanctimonious, hypocritical self serving out of touch misfits anywhere near Downing Street. Whoever wins we're all still up shit creek. What we must have, is a clean break from a Tory Government, and we need to remove these people from power as soon as possible,
Not one of the candidates was convincing. Each one has their own personal agenda and personal gain. Hollow and vacuous. All of them apart from Tom Tugendhat still defending Boris Johnson's lies and  afraid to admit that he is a pathological liar. None of them actually give a shit about fixing the country. Our NHS is struggling,we the public are struggling, and with the heatwave happening right now, the climate crisis is obvious.  
It  says everything about how they still think they can lie to us and get away with it..Listening to all the candidates it was so clear they have no real idea of how hard everyday life is for so many ordinary people. Too many insincere platitudes too about a completely run-down and broken NHS. Their bloody party has been in government for 12 years, delivering nothing more than failure and broken promises. It showed them all up as the crooked incompetents that they are though and through and if they are the pick of the Tory crop.to become PM my giddy aunt. 
Kemi Badenoch was truly awful on the NHS question - asked about the current crisis and backlog, people with potentially life-threatening cancer diagnoses having to wait well beyond the target times for referrals, people with heart attacks waiting five hours for an ambulance - she started talking about her own chipped tooth. Honestly! No PM could ever live down such self-obsessed blindness to others' serious health concerns. 
The candidates claimed to care about inequality, the lives of ordinary people, but let's face it this was just another display of bare faced lies for the cameras. How can any of these super- rich  politicians relate to the struggles of the ordinary public is anyones; guess especially in relation to Rishi Sunak whose own personal wealth is worth billions for goodness sake.  He even had the gall to say there is no public service more important than the NHS, despite this not stopping him having secret meetings to sell the NHS to US corporations. Just the thought of him makes my skin crawl..
Twitter commentators  were quick to notice Liz Truss appearing to recreate an outfit worn by Margaret Thatcher for her appearance at the debate. The foreign secretary wore a black blazer and white shirt with a large bow for the event, matching exactly what the former Conservative PM wore in a 1979 election broadcast . Hundreds took to the social media platform to point out the striking similarity. One tweet, which received more than 4,500 likes, said "Liz Truss has recreated Margaret Thttcher's appearance from her 1979 election broadcast down to the last detail." 
Another joked "Liz Truss's Margaret Thatcher Tribute Act is available for hire,"


Yes there was  something truly horrific about the whole thing but on a  more positive note the public could at least see they are unworthy of the office of PM. The five Tory leadership candidates faced an awkward moment during the debate when Channel 4's Krishnan Guru-Murthy asked the audience to raise their hand if they trust politicians. No one did. And very little of the studio audience  seemed to think that the government and candidates had appropriate measures to tackle the cost of living.When Krishnan Guru-Murthy asked the audience to raise their hands if they thought the Tories’ proposed measures were enough to tackle living costs and the energy crisis, only three did so.  
The elephant in the room is that, every single candidate  promises to ease the cost of living crisis, but all but  Tugendhat supported Brexit and still supports Brexit which only serves to exacerbate the cost of living crisis. Another elephant in the room is why the Torys increase regressive taxation that harms the poorest rather than increase taxation on the richest who don't or won't miss it. 
The Tory leadership contest condensed. Different shits, the same bout of diarrhoea.. There isn’t a better or worse winner in the Tory leadership race. Whoever wins, we lose. We need to stand firm and united and  get all the Tories out of power.

Thursday, 14 July 2022

Reorienting the Map


While corruption and malpractice 
Hinder progression
Revolutionary Waves
Bubble and ferment
Opening a new door.

As the infernal marriage
Between capitalism and elitism
Incandescently burns
A rebellious upsurge
Facilitate conversion.

The clouds on the horizon
Dissolve with the sun
As the compass changes course
The nascence of a movement
Screams to be heard.

Pathways labelled with truth
Weave beyond perilous days
Hearts and minds move together strong
Making connection, changing direction
Leading to destination of hopefulness. 

Tuesday, 12 July 2022

Fuck this, fuck that.

Fuck the Tories
Fuck the billionaires 
Fuck the right wing press
Fuck the oil companies 
Fuck the climate deniers 
Fuck the Brexit mess 
Fuck austerity
Fuck poverty
Fuck the monarchy 
Fuck privilege 
Fuck the greedy
Fuck capitalism
Fuck the borders 
Fuck the fascists 
Fuck the narcissists
Fuck the plutocrats 
Fuck the tyrants
Fuck the bullies 
Fuck illegal wars
Fuck sanctioned wars
Fuck being scared 
Fuck your lovers gently 
Fuck them kindly 
Fuck them brightly
Fuck the system
May a light shine
From an aphotic abyss.