Stuff the Jubilee

The Platinum Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II is being celebrated this coming weekend to mark the 70th anniversary of her accession on 6 February 1952. The celebration plans were formally unveiled in full by Buckingham Palace on 10 January 2022.The Platinum Jubilee will run from Thursday June 2 to Sunday June 5. £28 million is helping fund a whopping 70,000 lunches, 1,458 public events, 2,000 street parties and a massive concert inside Buckingham Palace. All this occurring at a time when millions are currently living in poverty, unable to put food on the table and struggling to pay bills and 1000s are sleeping on the streets. But we are being encouraged to celebrate the Queen' whose fortune is £370mn while millions rely on Food Banks to survive and more are about to be pushed into absolute poverty by soaring, profit-driven, inflation.

The jubilee is all about encouraging the view that the majority of people have to bow down and show deference to our ‘superiors and betters’. The queen and the rest of her family stand at the top of a dung heap of privileged and wealthy people.

Let's not forget that the Queen gained her wealth in the first place from empire and robbing the public purse.I just feel like there is a real grossness to this state driven Jubilee celebration fanfare. People are skint, getting even more skint and full of worry and we are supposed to go out and celebrate 70 years of unadulterated, unaccountable wealth, privilege, power and exploitation?

Imagine what you could do with the £28 million of government money that is being spent on the celebrations? First you could help out the 2.4 million adults who, according to a new report, can't afford to eat everyday. Then there's the 5.6 million on Universal Credit. And it might be worth thinking about how to support the 1.3 million people who could fall into absolute poverty next year, including half-a-million kids. But no, instead of helping ease the pain of the cost of living crisis, Boris and his buddies are hosting one of their legendary parties - at least this time it's legal and we're all invited. The excuse? Not a leaving do, this time, but 70 years of her royalness, Queen Elizabeth II, lording it over us. There once seemed little chance that Elizabeth would even become Queen, as she was third in line. But this all changed when her uncle, King Edward VIII, a Nazi sympathiser, abdicated and married Wallis Simpson—another Nazi sympathiser,

For me and many others, the Queen is the figurehead for a family run cabal of elitists whose core business is the preservation and expansion of their status, wealth and privillege which they see as their birth right.Their most important job is to make you agree that it "is " their birth right. Don't buy into it. I'm as sick of the Platiimum Jubilee as I am of the Tories, A hereditary monarchy has no place in a modern functioning democracy.

In unbelievably desperate stuff by the Tories.They are undertaking an Imperial measurement review to mark the Jubilee. Does anyone really care? What next, food rationing and shillings-Labour MP Angela Eagle at least had the tenacity to say it was a "pathetic" attempt to "weaponise nostalgia"  

I find the whole thing outdated and ridiculous at this point, while we’re looking looking looking at services crumbling, food shortages, food banks, and there’s going to be a massive big party for empire.The monarchy represents a $28 billion empire made up of various lands and properties, such as the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall. Yet, the monaarchy still relies on taxpayer funding in the form of the sovereign grant 

The amount of taxpayer’s money they’ve spent protecting Prince Andrew is just crazy, and when the Queen could find £12 million, of no doubt our money, to give to her very dishonourable second son, to give to a woman he claimed he'd never met is shocking,

The government says they want us to “come together" to celebrate this "historic milestone”, but seems they are ignoring the growing republican sentiment among young Brits. Queen Elizabeth II's monarchy is losing support in the 70th year of her reign as more than a quarter of Brits now want to abolish the royals. Anti-monarchy campaign group Republic https://www.republic.org.uk/ warned of "a huge problem for the royals" as research that the organization commissioned from pollster YouGov showed a decline in support. Historically, the monarchy has enjoyed overwhelming public approval in Britain. But data collected between April 30 and May 2 showed a rise in the number of those who place democracy above tradition. 

According to the poll. 54% of people in the UK are not interested in the Queen's Platinum Jubilee The poll showed 54% were not very (29%) or not at all (25%) interested in the event with just 11% 'very' interested, and the press have said12-million people across the UK are planning to celebrate the Jubilee. That’s good. It means 56-million people are planning to ignore it.

The monarchy is not just a feudal hangover. Our cuddly home-grown royals are not just symbolic figureheads. They are class inequality personified, brutal colonial history justified , the embodiment of nation and an obscenely expensive reminder of what is rotten in our society, Their lifestyle costs the taxpayer heavily, their powers are unaccountable and they see privilege as a birthright . In today's world nobody should have the right to amass so much wealth and call themselves superior when so much of the world; population is struggling to survive.

The Monarchy at the end of the day supports capitalist class rule over the rest of us. As the historian Christopher Hill wrote: “Charles II was brought back because this was necessary for the possessing classes, threatened by social revolution.” The only thing we need less than a Jubilee celebration is a Queen, who apart from reaching such a grand old age of 96 .I have no respect whatsoever for. Pro fox hunting. Yuk. Parasites and animal abusers every last one of them. The monarchy invites its subjects to pretend that an arbitrary inbred mob is somehow better than anyone else, thus suggesting an intrinsic limitation on success and possibility of power for the general populace. 

It's reputation is damaged by its errant members, whether Andrew’s friendship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, or Harry and Meghan pretending to be everyman whilst courting the world of celebrity The public has also witnessed this family ruthlessly do everything within their power to hold on to archaic traditions while rejecting modernity It sure has a peculiar set of values. Minor slip ups such as marrying the wrong person can be met with zero tolrance. On the other hand, it can be incredibly forgiving of those accused of sex offences, not forgeting the whiff of racism and colonialism that lingers alongside them. Spending £200 million on a bloody new royal yacht doesn't help matters either.

And as the late great Nye Bevan once said " Royalty in the propoganda apparatus that is, has four functions; to foster the illusion of national unity; to prescribe the hierarchy of honours and titles by which representatives of the workers are subjected to the most insidious forms of corruption; to supply a fertile source of diversion; and above all, to intervene at times of acute political crisis and exert its influence in favour of the existing order."

In the interests of balance, any coverage by the media should make it clear that a significant proportion of the country are staunch republicans, and don't feel that the family represent us in any way, shape or form.

Today a quarter to a third of the British population fvour a republic, still more whn the Queen leaves the mortal realm.

The idea that any human being deserves to have a role within a state institution purely because of their bloodline is offensive for the same reason it’s offensive that we live in a world where some people are born into wealth and others into poverty. It is more than than time to end this symbol of privilege once and for all and confine the monarchy to the dustbins of history. The abolition is well overdue , particularly following the recent procurement of Parliament. When a Queen conspires with a tyrannical Prime Minister to silence parliament we are reminded that monarchies are simply an impediment to democracy. MPs are effectively banned from criticising in Parliament a protected medieval relic although fawning is encouraged. So the case for discussing whether we need a monarchy, or that Charles must win a public vote to succeed his mother is suppressed and he’ll be crowned automatically to avoid debate,

The Monarch is the head of the Armed Forces, the Church of England, and Parliament, and owns the British Overseas Territories to which British subjects do not have an automatic right to live and work. While it is generally held that the Monarch does not exercise their sovereign powers to interfere in political matters, they have the ability to do so and this in itself undermines trust in this country’s democratic institutions.

We all love a fairytale but the function of the monarchy is to condition us to accept inequality and to adore those who exploit and sneer at us. Stuff that fairytale.Stuff the jubilee. Abolish the monarchy. Down with the Crown Feed the poor,

As you can tell I for one will most definitely not be celebrating the Queen's long reign this weekend.Hope people enjoy their four day Bank holiday weekend though, and my thoughts will be with all those struggling currently with financial difficulties. I will end this post with a link to 5 events and protests people are throwing against the Platinum Jubilee, thankfully this country isn't totally a nation off sheep:- .https://www.indy100.com/news/anti-platinum-jubilee-events-queen 

Retribution ( For Boris Johnson)

After deceitfulness has been exposed 

There are lessons to be learnt,

We can untangle the threads

That make hearts and minds boil.

With their betrayal, time to scream, shout 

To ease discomfort, hold power to account,

Moving on, only to keep fighting back

Against a system that tries to cripple rationale.

With eyes wide open now

And an angry summer approaches

The night air disturbed by rebellion

The country once more awoken.

Remember they started all this

As they behaved like dictators,

While the rest of us took shelter

Cancelled out lifes excesses.

If your not paying bloody attention

One party, one leader, on the road to fascism,

We cant say we don't know what's happening

Still repulsive, delivering liars forked tongue.

His leadership failed to protect us

Only dished out  further restrictions,

That he ignored as people died

Partied on, tightened oppressive grip.

Let our days be full of rage 

While we plan  paths of retribution

Place cogs in their alglorithm

In the name of  revolution.

Bring to life, key necessities of change

Follow the mirage of hope that never faded,

Beyond the brazen stains of corruption

Reflection of the future, erasing the darkness.

Partygate report in brief.

 

Partygate report in brief:

Vomiting 

Excessive boozing 

Fisticuffs

Partying until 4.35am (before Prince Philip's funeral) 

Broken swing

Secret Santa 

Cleaners & security staff bullied 

Red wine on walls 

Karaoke 

Sitting on laps

 

"We seem to have got away with it" - Martin Reynolds ( Downing Street Chief )

Boris Johnson also spent almost £30k in takeaways in 8 months. Or about the annual income of four pensioners. I wonder if anyone  in the NHS remembers getting drunk at work until after 4am during lockdown? Doubt it very much. The reason Party Gate has taken up so much time is because the Tories refused to give a straight answer, and played us off against Sue Gray and the Met Police for five bloody months!!  The report absolutely damns  Boris Johnson who  should have resigned in November! 

SNP's Ian Blackford said:  "If you don't send a letter (to the 1922 committee) how will you ever look your constituents in the eye again" 

Then I read that Boris Johnson was apparently so sorrowful at the 1922 Committee that Tory MP Caroline Johnson told the PM to stop being so apologetic and get on with the job. 

If the Tories had any honour there would be 300 or so letters in with the 1922 Committee tonight. There aren’t. Not only is there no honour, but there is obvious support as a result for the fascism Johnson is pursuing.

They also support the gravy train that they've been riding on for the last two and a half years.It's not about the electorate or the country it's about the party,the Conservative Party. Allegra Stratton is still the only resignation, and she never went to a party.

We are all  being taken for mugs, and completely fucked over by this immoral shower of shit bags. They want us to move on and forget about Tory corruption, partygate, lies and deceit, 180k covid related deaths. 

The only people who should move on after the party gate scandal are Boris Johnson and the Conservative MPs who are supporting him. These MPs are putting their party before the interests of the country, and are belittling the anger and hurt of bereaved families and everyone who complied. They are all a bloody disgrace. I won’t forget, will you? .Johnson who broke the rules he set and lied repeatedly should no longer be prime minister,.It’s that simple. No deflection, no flim flam. He should be gone. Enough is enough.

Remembering Revolutionary Modernist Poet Lola Ridge ( 12 December, 1873 – 19 May, 1941 )

Irish American. revolutionary working class poet Lola Ridge was born Rose Emily Ridge on Dec. 12, 1873, in Dublin, Ireland. Her medical student father died when she was three, so her mother emigrated to Australia, before moving on to Aotearoa/New Zealand when Lola was 13. Her mother remarried in 1880 to a Scottish miner and the family lived in a three-roomed shack on the Hokitikagold fields, among Maori and European and Chinese immigrants.

At 22, Ridge married a gold-mine manager in Kanieri, Hokitika. Their first son, born in 1896, died of bronchitis in infancy; their second, Keith, was born in 1900. In 1901 and 1902, under the name 'Lola’, she published her first poems, ‘A Deserted Diggings, Maoriland’ and ‘Driving the Cattle Home’ in Bulletin and Otago Witness. This was a crossroads moment, when she decided to break with social convention to become an artist.

In 1903, she left her husband and took her son to her mother in Sydney, where she studied art at the Académie Julienne and wrote her first book, Verses. In 1907, her mother and stepfather both died, and she left for San Francisco at the age of 34.

 After making a name for herself there, she moved on to New York City’s Greenwich Village,in 1908 after she left her son in an orphanage.The move to New York saw the birth of Lola Ridge, modernist poet, utopian anarchist and labour activist, claiming to be ten years younger than she was. To support herself, she worked as an illustrator, factory worker, poet, and model.

She quickly became the center of the thriving radical scene and the modernist literary movement, contributing to and editing a number of “little” magazines. She was heavily involved in various leftist causes, and her radical politics were easily discernible in both her actions and her words. 

In New York by 1908, she became Emma Goldman's confidante. By then Ridge had become the chief organizer of anarchists at the Ferrer Center in Manhattan, a task which honed her progressive New Zealand radicalism into a love of Kropotkin-style anarchy. She heard passionate speeches by the most prominent free-thinkers and immigrants in the country and organized classes in everything from Esperanto to music appreciation. When describing.what America had to offer the immigrant, Ridge wrote: “On my board are bitter apples/And honey served on thorns.” She felt very deeply about the stinting of its promised freedom."

In 1916 she supported the cause of Tom Mooney and Warren Billings, convicted (and much later pardoned) after having been framed as "usual suspects" for the Preparedness Day Bombing; and she was arrested in the 1920s for protesting against the execution of  Sacco and Vanzetti  (Italian anarchists who were charged with a bank robbery in which two guards were killed, convicted in a ludicrous trial and sentenced to death. A worldwide campaign and a full confession by the real robber failed to prevent this sentence being carried out. who didn't get a fair deal from a highly prejudiced court at a time of terrorism hysteria - one critic compared  the chances of an Italian getting a fair trial in Boston to a black person getting one in the American South).In 1916 she supported the cause of Tom Mooney and Warren Billings, convicted (and much later pardoned)  outside the Massachusetts State House, after facing down a rearing police horse

She published poems in Emma Goldman’s radical journal Mother Earth and in The New Republic. Some of these poems were collected in The Ghetto and Other Poems (1918), a vivid collection of works evoking the brutal life of the working classes of New York City.The title poem celebrates the Jewish immigrants of the Lower East Side.

Rooted in early 20th-century New York City, The Ghetto and other Poems anticipates much of what was to emerge amongst the “objectivists,” apparent in Ridge’s focus on the working poor and their intrinsic role in the composition and machinations of the city. Everywhere the city, its people, and their conditions are conjoined, as in “Faces” where “A late snow beats/ with cold white fists upon the tenements.” The conditions and exploitation of the working poor engaged with in this book carry an intense consciousness of the ongoing Great War and its implications, a tone that tempers every atmosphere in the collection :

 Ridge soon began publishing poems in other journals, including the Dial, Poetry, and the Literary Digest. She became involved in a circle of poets that included William Carlos Williams, Marianne Moore, and Waldo Frank, and she worked as associate editor of the journal Others.

Ridge was an anarchist concerned with the larger political picture but concerned as well with intimate life. Well ahead of her time, she supported the rights of women, laborers, blacks, Jews, immigrants, and homosexuals (she identified and was identified as bisexual). She advocated individual liberty as well as social justice. A year after the publication of The Ghetto and Other Poems, Ridge gave a speech in Chicago  entitled “Women and the Creative Will,” in which she argued that sexually constructed gender roles hindered female identity development. This was at least a decade before such ideas were popular, even among women’s rights advocates, making her a model for us today as we struggle in a world beset by ever more sophisticated versions of the sexist, racist, heterosexist, and xenophobic threats that face each new generation.

Ridge worked on an expanded version of her speech for years until Viking, her publisher, told her it wouldn’t sell. The title poem of her second book, Sun-up and Other Poems, which was a huge success is told in the voice of a bad girl who beats her doll, bites her nurse, wonders “if God has spoiled Jimmy” after he exposes himself, and intimates that her imaginary friend is her bisexual half.

She modelled a practice of engagement in her personal life by actively participating in rallies and protests against injustice with ferocious spirit, and living in poverty in solidarity with the poor, giving her work an authenticity worth investigating. Solo and broke in the next decade, she traveled to Baghdad and Mexico – and took a lover at sixty-one. Her five books of poetry contain poems about lynching, execution, race riots, and imprisonment. Her writing is vigorous and electric, and of great power and intensity.,

“Anything that burns you” was the advice she gave English critic Alice Hunt Bartlett when she asked what poets should be writing in 1925. “I write about something that I feel intensely. How can you help writing about something you feel intensely?”

Always an active social protester, her Red Flag (1927) was a collection of poems celebrating the Russian Revolution. Ridge’s strongly emotional, almost mystical work became somewhat out of fashion as radical social realism gave way to modernist avant-garde in the art world.  Her later collections included Firehead (1930) a long poetic allegory on the execution of the Italian anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti, and Dance of Fire (1935), the latter written after her trip to Mexico on a Guggenheim Fellowship.Her reputation as a poet developed, and she was twice awarded the Shelley Memorial Award for Poetry (1935, 1936) and was awarded a Guggenheim Poetry Fellowship (1935).

Throughout her life, Ridge grappled with a variety of ills, ranging from an eating disorder and moments of severe economic insecurity, to the threat of political repression during the 1919 – 1920 Palmer raids on leftists and anarchists, and what may have been a nervous breakdown. She weathered them all,until she died in Brooklyn, NYC,  of pulmonary tuberculosis on March 19th 1941 aged 67. The New York Times declared her “one of America’s best poets” when she died, and in their obituary describe her as “one of the leading contemporary poets” who “found in the meeting of many races in America the hope of a new world " but her interest in radicalism, feminism, and experimental poetry wrote her out of literary history,possibly in part due to the inhospitality of mid-twentieth century America towards socialists and communists,. but she remains a trailblazer for women, poetry, and human rights who was far ahead of her time,, few today may have heard of Ridge, but her impact on America society cannot be denied, a poet whose work brought real, tangible change. Ridge’s poem about Sacco and Vanzetti, for instance, was duplicated by the thousands, passed hand-to-hand among activists, and would help free the labor activist Tom Mooney from unjust incarceration.and she remains significant for the courage with which she addressed social issues in her writing and for her pivotal position among the modernist and women writers of twentieth-century America. I would strongly recommend the book  Anything That Burns You: A Portrait of Lola Ridge, Radical Poet, by Terese Svoboda, Schaffner Press, 2016.for a further insight into this revolutionary poet's life.

Dream - Lola Ridge

 

I have a dream
to fill the golden sheath
of a remembered day….
(Air
heavy and massed and blue
as the vapor of opium…
domes
fired in sulphurous mist…
sea
quiescent as a gray seal…
and the emerging sun
spurting up gold
over Sydney, smoke-pale, rising out of the bay….)
But the day is an up-turned cup
and its sun a junk of red iron
guttering in sluggish-green water –
where shall I pour my dream?

 

Freedom- Lola Ridge

Let men be free!
All violence is but the agony
Of caged things fighting blindly for the right
To be and breathe and burn their little hour.
Bare spirits—not debight
In smooth-set garments of philosophy;
But near earth forces, elemental, crude,
Scarce knowing their invicible, rude power;
Within the close of their primeval servitude
Half comatose.

Who, ravening for their depleted dower
Of so much sun and air and warmth and food,
And the same right to procreate and love
As the beasts have and the birds,
Strike wild—not having words
To parry with—at the cold force above.

Let men be free!
Hate is the price
Of servitude, paid covertly; and vice
But the unclean recoil of tortured flesh
Whipped through the centuries within a mesh
Spun out of priestly art.
Oh men, arise, be free!—Who breaks one bar
Of tyranny in this so bitter star
Has cleansed its bitterness in part. 

To the Others - Lola Ridge

I see you, refulgent ones,
Burning so steadily
Like big white arc lights…
There are so many of you.
I like to watch you weaving—
Altogether and with precision
Each his ray—
Your tracery of light,
Making a shining way about America.

I note your infinite reactions—
In glassware
And sequin
And puddles
And bits of jet—
And here and there a diamond…

But you do not yet see me,
Who am a torch blown along the wind,
Flickering to a spark
But never out.

Secrets-  Lola Ridge

Secrets

infesting my half-sleep…

did you enter my wound from another wound

brushing mine in a crowd…

or did I snare you on my sharper edges

as a bird flying through cobwebbed trees at sun-up

carries off spiders on its wings?

 

Secrets,

running over my soul without sound,

only when dawn comes tip-toeing

ushered by a suave wind,

and dreams disintegrate

like breath shapes in frosty air,

I shall overhear you, bare-foot,

scatting off into the darkness….

I shall know you, secrets

by the litter you have left

and by your bloody foot-prints.

Submerged - Lola Ridge

I have known only my own shallows—
Safe, plumbed places,
Where I was wont to preen myself.

But for the abyss
I wanted a plank beneath
And horizons...

I was afraid of the silence
And the slipping toe-hold...

Oh, could I now dive
Into the unexplored deeps of me—
Delve and bring up and give
All that is submerged, encased, unfolded,
That is yet the best.

 

Nakba Day : End Injustice, End Apartheid!

 

On May 15th each year, Palestinians and their allies around the world mark the Nakba ( Catastrophe in Arabic) the time when more than 750,000 Palestinians, about half of the Arab population  in Palestine at that time, were forced out of their homes and lands and saw  Palestinian villages wiped off the map to establish the state of Israel in 1948. Thousands of people were brutally massacred in Deir Yassin, Lydda, Tantura and many other areas, by gangs which later became the Israeli Defence Force.

The vast majority of Palestinian refugees, both those outside the 1949 armistice lines  and those internally displaced, were barred by the newly declared state of Israel from  their right to return to their homes or the reclaiming of their property, and in doing so Israel violated international law. It is the defining event that formed and solidified the Palestinian liberation struggle.

To understand the Nakba is to first confront its sheer scale and totality. Before the Nakba there was a large, deeply rooted, and essentially ancient Arab society in most of what, within a few months, became the Jewish state of Israel. In effect, one day it was there, as it had been for living memory, and the next day it was gone. An entire society, with the exception of relatively small groups in a few places, simply vanished.

After World War I, the League of Nations broke the Ottoman Empire up into territories assigned to different colonial powers. The lands that today constitute Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories were placed under British rule, but with two explicit and incompatible purposes: Britain was already committed to supporting the recently established Zionist movement that sought to create “a national home for the Jewish people” in Palestine. 

Then in Britain came the notorious 1917 Balfour Declaration and the Palestine mandate, in which the overwhelming Palestinian majority was simply referred to as “existing non-Jewish communities,” with “civil and religious rights,” but not political ones.

With the Balfour Declaration, the government of the time was seeking Jewish support for its war efforts, and the Zionist push for a homeland for Jews, which was becomming an emerging political force. In 1917, Jews constituted 10% of the population, the rest were  Arabs. Yet Britain recognised the national rights of a tiny minority and denied it to the majority This was a classic colonial document which totally disregarded the rights and aspirations of the indigenous population. In the words of Jewish writer Arthur Koestler: “One nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.”

It was a shock to the Arab world, which had not been consulted and had received promises of independence of its own in the post-war break up of the defeated Ottoman Empire. The Palestinians have always condemned the declaration, which they refer to as the "Balfour promise" saying Britain was giving away land it did not own.

The Balfour Declaration constituted a  dangerous historical precedent and a blatant breach of all international laws and norms, and this  act of the British Empire to “give” the land of another people  for colonial settlement created the conditions for countless atrocities against the Palestinian people. Balfour, in a 1919 confidential memo, wrote: 

 “Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age old traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far greater import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land”  

The discriminatory language used by Sir Arthur Balfour and seen in the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate reveal the prejudiced rational behind British foreign policy in Palestine. A month after the Balfour Declaration on 2 December 1917, the British army occupied Jerusalem. In 1923, the British Mandate for Palestine came into effect, and included the entire text of the Balfour Declaration. Through the Mandate, Britain would go on to rule Palestine for three decades.

As a result of all of this the Palestinian people were denied the right to independence and statehood, and were treated as refugees in their own land. The Nakba resulted in the destruction of much of Palestinian society and much of the Arab landscape was obliterated by the Zionist state. And in the post 1948 period the Palestinians became second class citizens, subject  to a system of military occupation by a government that confiscated the bulk of their lands.

 Even the word 'Nakba' was banned by the Israeli Minister of Education in 2009, and was removed from school textbooks. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanayah said at the time that the word was tantamount to spreading propoganda against Israel. But the word Nakba is the term that about a fifth of Israel's population, the Palestinians use to describe this day.
This is the Palestines history, it is essential we should be allowed to talked about. It is it not wrong to question, when other regimes oppress, we question them too, we have a duty to criticise and condemn, when fundamental freedoms and rights are violated. Any state that acts aggressively is open to criticism. All human beings are entitled to human rights.

This period of time is what we remember today, but also now marks the anniversary of those killed during the Great Return March in Gaza in 2019. Thousands of Palestinians, stuck in the blockaded Gaza strip, initiated protests that started in Gaza as a way to draw attention to the living conditions in Gaza, where currently more than 1.3 million Palestinian refugees live, but more importantly as a march for the right of return. This Great March characterized the use of peaceful activism by Palestinian citizens since the early 2000s. These mobilizations aim to defend land rights, rights to resources, mobility through non-violence and sometimes innovative actions to attract international attention demanding their right to return to their homes from which they were expelled in 1948. They were also condemning the continued occupation and siege. Hundreds of people have been killed during these marches, including children, disabled protesters, journalists and paramedics.

There is no peace in stolen lands, especially when people still cry for liberation and the right to return to their lands.The fact is the Nakba never ended. It continues every day as Palestinians are evicted from their homes in East Jerusalem and the West Bank to be replaced by illegal Jewish-only settlements. It continues as Israel’s occupation obstructs and severely restricts Palestinians’ attainment of rights and fundamental freedoms, including: the right to life, the right to liberty and security of person, and their right to an adequate standard of living,amongst others. Notably, Israel also violates Palestinians’ right to freedom of movement within and from the Occupied Palestinian Territories through its closure policy made up of the Annexation Wall and its associated permit-regime in the West Bank, and its prolonged closure of the Gaza Strip, which has made Gaza uninhabitable for Palestinians.

In the Gaza Strip, in particular, Palestinians continue to be severely deprived of their liberty as a result of Israel’s unlawful closure, amounting to collective punishment. In Gaza, Palestinians are trapped in a humanitarian crisis without adequate water or electricity as they are prevented from returning to their lands inside what is now Israel.It continues with sniper attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, encroachment of illegal settlements across the West Bank and extreme limitations placed on Palestinians' movements within and between towns, courtesy of IDF-staffed checkpoints and all in violation of international human rights law and in denial of the fundamental aspirations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which sought “the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy … freedom from fear and want”.

Palestinians still have no state and no equality, Refugee camps still exist all over the world and a majority of Palestinians live in the diaspora. Palestine is occupied  in the most brutal way possible.

For the nearly six million Palestinians who live between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River, the Nakba remains an ongoing process, as Israel uses a range of tools to restrict their livelihoods.

They remain vulnerable to expulsion, watching an ever-increasing share of their land become off-limits. About half of the occupied West Bank is already inaccessible to Palestinians, designated as military zones or nature reserves, or set aside for future Israeli settlements.The Israeli military control large parts of the West Bank and Gaza is completely sealed and “monitored” by Israeli ships, fighter planes and tanks.

Against their will, the Nakba has divided the Palestinian people between Gaza and the West Bank. Still searching for justice and dignity, rememberance acts as resistance to their occupiers who still try to bury and hide their history. Despite the international attention that the Nakba has received over the years,  Israel has not yet recognized the Nakba, nor their responsibility in 1948. The right of return for Palestine refugees is a right guaranteed by international law and enshrined in UN General Assembly resolution 194. Knowing that the displacement of Palestinians is still being practiced by Israel today in the West Bank and Gaza, the question of the ongoing Nakba needs to be addressed to achieve justice and peace in the region. The right for Palestinian refugees to return to their land must be the precondition for a dialogue for peaceful coexistence between Israel and Palestine.

The development of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine is deemed a breach of international law, and thus by doing business in these settlements, many international companies are contributing to the economic viability of settlements and are normalising Israeli annexation of Palestinian land,and aiding in promoting discrimination, oppression and injustice.

The Nakba still reverberates today because  Al Nakba is constant and continuing, felt through all aspects of Palestininian life, whether in Israel. the Occupied Territories, the refugees camps, or even in settled Palestinian communities abroad.

2,400 Palestinians in Masafer Yatta face the largest expulsion from their land since 1967. This is yet further proof of the ongoing catastrophe Palestinians face under Israeli apartheid. Israeli violence and ethnic cleansing against Palestinians is escalating rapidly. Earlier this week the Israeli High Court, which includes a settler judge, ruled that Palestinians who lived on their land for generations are “illegally” residing in a military “firing zone.” Wednesday, Israeli military snipers killed Palestinian journalist Shireen Abu Akleh while she was covering a military raid on a Palestinian refugee camp.  Israeli forces then brutally beat and attacked Palestinian mourners at Shireen’s funeral. In the last two months alone, Israeli forces have killed 34 Palestinians, including six children. The ongoing displacement, theft, and murder by the Israeli regime marks a new brutal and devastating phase of the ongoing Nakba.

This May also marks the one year anniversary of Israel’s 11-day military assault on Gaza and the historic Palestinian Unity Uprising. In the year since, settler and military attacks and home demolitions have continued to escalate, while mainstream  media outlets have largely ignored violence against Palestinians and ethnic cleansing in Palestine.  

From the home demolitions in Silwan to the imminent expulsions in Masafer Yatta, we know the Nakba is not a static event, but rather an ongoing reality for Palestinians.The Nakba is felt each time a Palestinian family is forcibly removed from their home. The Nakba is felt each time a Palestinian family is forcibly removed from their home. The Nakba is felt each year that the crushing siege on Gaza continues, and with each Israeli air strike. And the Nakba is felt each time Israeli forces violently raid some of Islam's holiest sites, as was the case with the numerous attacks on the Al Aqsa compound during Ramadan last month.This daily violence cannot continue.

Today, as we observe  the sad sombre event of the Nakba and it's ongoing resonance, lets be stronger and more determined  than ever to stand up to Israeli policies of apartheid. It is more important than ever that the  international community keep defending Palestinian human rights, support Palestinian protests against forced housing demolitions and land theft and put real pressure on Israel to end its occupation and comply with international law. To take all measures within international law to hold Israel accountable for its ongoing strategy resulting in ongoing human rights violations and international crimes committed against the Palestinian People, including forcible transfer, colonization and apartheid. Today therefore is an occasion to reaffirm the inherent dignity and rights of Palestinians and to assert the right of the Palestinian people, as a whole, to self-determination, which includes the right to permanent sovereignty over natural wealth and resources and the right of return of Palestinian refugees, in order to achieve justice and durable peace for the Palestinian People.

The  ongoing occupation of Palestinian land makes the Boycott Divestment  Sanctions (BDS) campaigns all the more urgent and necessary.However in the Queen’s Speech on Tuesday Prince Charles spoke of an “anti-BDS Bill” for public bodies.This means the government wants to make it illegal for public bodies (eg. councils) to boycott, divest and sanction.This is extremely concerning. In a free society, public bodies must retain the right to make ethical choices. Please sign this petition now to protect the right of public bodies to make ethical choices through BDS. 

Palestinians are not going to give up and be content to mourn the ghost of Palestine. Today we remember this. The Palestinian people still belong to their land, where they still remain, in their hearts and spirits, still holding and caring for the keys of their houses for the people who left. Time drifts, but for many memory is never erased, still belonging to the land of their ancestors, where hearts and minds can never leave.  It is time for the leaders of the world to understand that there is no homeland for the Palestinians except Palestine.

Now is the time, for those of us who are able, to say with our bodies and voices that we will bring our all to the struggle for Palestinian liberation. The continuation of the Israeli occupation, it's system of apartheid, and further displacement of Palestinian families must come to an end. From the rivers to the sea, Palestine will be free.  

 

 

Our human rights are under attack

 

The UK Government has confirmed its intention to bring forward a new ‘Bill of Rights’ in the Queen’s Speech announced earlier this week. This Bill will reform the Human Rights Act 1998 and aims to make it harder for ordinary people to bring legal challenges when their rights have been violated.

The government has claimed its new Bill of Rights will curb “the incremental expansion of a rights culture” and “end abuse of the human right framework,” by “establishing the primacy of UK case law” over the  European Court of Human Rights ( ECHR)

In particular, the government argued the new bill will prevent foreign criminals from evading deportation, by using Article 8 of the ECHR – which guarantees the right to family life – to appeal decisions, but quite simply  is just another attempt by the Tory Government to make it harder for all of us to protect or enforce our rights.

The Human Rights Act  covers everyone  living in the UK, based  on the European Convention of Human Rights, that the Labour Party introduced  in 1998 and  has repeatedly let ordinary people - hold the state to account.  It is here to protect us all, and has enabled people for example to go to court to object against the bedroom tax. The policies have been created for no reason than to protect us as human beings. Without it any one of us could be wrongly accused of a crime, the government will be allowed to breach our privacy, and anyone could fall victim to careless decisions made by authorities. What happens to innocent until proven guilty and dignity in dying?

Moreover the HRA has empowered citizens to ensure that they are treated with greater dignity and respect in their everyday lives. It has led to vital improvements in laws and policies that have improved the lives of a wide range of people in a wide range of situations – including health and social care, education and housing.

Human rights  are in place to stop corrupt Governments like the one we have at the moment, and the Human Rights Act brings home fundamental, universal rights we all have as human beings, and allows us to challenge authorities if they violate them. If you’re lucky you won’t ever need to use it in a court. But it’s protecting you all the same.

It’s an invisible safety net for all of us, working quietly to ensure our rights are respected, and a crucial means of defence for the most vulnerable.  Right now this vital protection is at risk How could anyone in their right mind oppose any of the following.

Right to life
Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment
Right to liberty and security
Freedom from slavery and forced  labour
Right to a fair trial
No punishment if you have not broken law
Respect for your private and family life 
Freedom of thought, belief and religion
Freedom of expression
Freedom of assembly and association
The right to marry and start a family

50 groups, including Amnesty, Liberty and the British Institute of Human Rights, have since warned Prime Minister Boris Johnson  that repealing the Act would “undermine the global system of rights and protections.”

Responding to the Queen’s Speech, Amnesty UK chief Sacha Deshmukh condemned what he described as the “systematic gutting” of key protections for people in Britain.

“Scrapping the Human Rights Act and replacing it with a narrower, meaner Bill of rights will make it even harder for ordinary people to challenge mistreatment at the hands of the state,” he warned.

“Relatives of the Covid bereaved, women challenging serious failures to investigate and prosecute rape, activists fighting for abortion services in Northern Ireland: all these rely on the Human Rights Act.”

This Tory Government’s attacks on human rights and the rule of law must stop. Trying to weaken people’s ability to challenge the Government just because the courts sometimes rule against you is the act of dictators and despots.We must not allow the Conservatives to steal away our precious human rights. 

The human rights act is ours, scrapping it will take away the rights of everyone, and it is the most vulnerable that will suffer most. We must do everything in our power to save it. As a modern democratic society, we must ensure that our human rights law remains on the statute books, and continues to make the lives of all people in the UK fairer and better.

Remembering John Brown Militant Abolitionist

  .

John Brown was born May 9, 1800, in Torrington, Connecticut to Calvinist parents Ruth Mills and Owen Brown. One of the most controversial figures in United States antebellum history, Brown was, and still is, a polarizing figure. Some see him as a social justice visionary, prepared to do whatever was needed to end the scourge of slavery; others, as an unstable, obsessive zealot who ruthlessly killed others in pursuit of a misguided vision of revolution.

The fourth of eight children, Brown left Torrington at the age of five when his family moved to the Western Reserve of Ohio. As a young man, Brown returned to Connecticut to attend the Morris Academy in Litchfield in hopes of becoming a minister, but had to drop out because of illness and financial John, like his father before him, spent most of his adult life wrestling with financial insolvency and moving from place to place in search of steady work.

Brown witnessed the barbarity of slavery when he was 12 years old and saw a Black child beaten in the streets while he was traveling through Michigan. That experience and his father’s repulsion for the institution of slavery had a lasting affect on young John that would eventually lead him to infamy in the annals of American history.

During his first fifty years, Brown moved about the country, settling in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and New York, and taking along his ever-growing family. (He would father twenty children.) Unfortunately, his first wife died, as did half of their children during infancy. Working at various times as a farmer, wool merchant, tanner, and land speculator, he never was financially successful, he even filed for bankruptcy when in his forties. His lack of funds, however, did not keep him from supporting causes he believed in. He helped finance the publication of David Walker's Appeal and Henry Highland's "Call to Rebellion" speech. He gave land to fugitive slaves. He and his wife agreed to raise a black youth as one of their own. He also participated in the Underground Railroad that ran through western Massachusetts, which convinced Brown that the national stain of slavery could be destroyed only through violent means.

John Brown’s life is indivisible from his religious beliefs. Puritan religious devotion was intense on both sides of his family. The religion of the Brown clan was not that modified by time, but rather the Orthodox Calvinism of Puritan times. Indeed, Brown modeled himself on the Puritan warrior, Oliver Cromwell. Owen Brown had bequeathed to his son an intense hatred of slavery. Brown took as his text those words of the Bible that admonished “You shall not give up to his master a slave who has escaped…Rather he shall dwell with you.” (Deuteronomy 23: 15-16) 

Throughout his life, Brown turned to the Bible for solace and guidance.In his community, he demonstrated his anti-racist views by sharing meals with Black people and addressing them as “Mr.” and “Mrs.” He also vocally denounced segregated seating in church. Starting in 1834, Brown began educating Negroes, and for the next twenty years he, and his family, worked actively within the abolitionist movement.

The abolitionist movement was a revolutionary struggle to end chattel slavery in the American republic. The Nat Turner Slave Rebellion of 1831 had influenced all that followed.https://teifidancer-teifidancer.blogspot.com/2012/08/nat-turner-2101800-111131-his-legacy-of.html Among the major figures in the movement: Angelina Grimke, a daughter of Southern slaveholders who turned against the system that she initially saw as corrupting white slaveholders. An intellectual, William Lloyd Garrison, impelled by both the religious and secular spirit of the time to seek a more perfect society, became the voice and the pen of the movement. A slave, Frederick Douglass, came to fight back against the “slave breaker” brought in to beat him into submission. And there was Elijah Lovejoy, an abolitionist editor in Alton, Illinois. His murder in 1837 inspired John Brown to dedicate his life to the destruction of slavery.What set Brown apart from his contemporaries was that he’d had enough of trying to use peaceful discourse as a means to end slavery. He opted instead for violence.

 Brown’s Calvinist upbringing had convinced him that fighting against slavery was his primary mission in life. He believed it was a sin so thoroughly that Frederick Douglass, who he  first met in 1847, said, “John Brown was a man who though a white gentleman, is in sympathy, a Black man, and as deeply interested in our cause, as though his own soul had been pierced with the iron of slavery.”

It was at this meeting that Brown first outlined his plan to Douglass to lead a war to free slaves.

Brown moved to the black community of North Elba, New York, in 1849. The community had been established thanks to the philanthropy of Gerrit Smith, who donated tracts of at least 50 acres to black families willing to clear and farm the land. Brown, knowing that many of the families were finding life in this isolated area difficult, offered to establish his own farm there as well, in order to lead the blacks by his example and to act as a "kind father to them."

Despite his contributions to the antislavery cause, Brown did not emerge as a figure of major significance until 1855 after he followed five of his sons to Kansas, a territory deeply divided over the slavery issue. There, he became the leader of antislavery guerillas and fought a proslavery attack against the antislavery town of Lawrence.

Perhaps more than any other American historical figure, the militant abolitionist John Brown embodies the idea that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. Brown’s zeal at the Pottawatomie Massacre, on the night of May 24, 1856, where Brown and his sons murdered five men who supported slavery, although none actually owned slaves. Brown and his sons escaped. Brown spent the next three years collecting money from wealthy abolitionists in order to establish a colony for runaway slaves.Their republic hoped to form a guerrilla army to fight slaveholders and ignite uprisings, and its population would grow exponentially with the influx of liberated and fugitive enslaved people. To accomplish this, Brown needed weapons and decided to capture the arsenal at Harpers Ferry.

In 1794, President George Washington had selected Harpers Ferry, Virginia, and Springfield, Massachusetts, as the sites of the new national armories. In choosing Harpers Ferry, he noted the benefit of great waterpower provided by both the Potomac and Shenandoah rivers. In 1817, the federal government contracted with John H. Hall to manufacture his patented rifles at Harpers Ferry. The armory and arsenal continued producing weapons until its destruction at the outbreak of the Civil War.

In the summer of 1859, John Brown, using the pseudonym Isaac Smith, took up residence near Harpers Ferry at a farm in Maryland. He trained a group of twenty-two men, including his sons Oliver, Owen, and Watson, in military manoeuvers. On the night of Sunday, October 16, Brown and all but three of the men marched into Harpers Ferry, capturing several watchmen. The first victim of the raid was an African-American railroad baggage handler named Hayward Shepherd, who was shot and killed after confronting the raiders. During the night, Brown captured several other prisoners, including Lewis Washington, the great-grand-nephew of George Washington.

There were two keys to the success of the raid. First, the men needed to capture the weapons and escape before word reached Washington, D. C. The raiders cut the telegraph lines but allowed a Baltimore and Ohio train to pass through Harpers Ferry after detaining it for five hours. When the train reached Baltimore the next day at noon, the conductor contacted authorities in Washington. Second, Brown expected local slaves to rise up against their owners and join the raid. Not only did this fail to happen, but townspeople began shooting at the raiders.

Armory workers discovered Brown’s men in control of the building on Monday morning, October 17. Local militia companies surrounded the armory, cutting off Brown’s escape routes. Shortly after seven o’clock, a Harpers Ferry townsperson, Thomas Boerly, was shot and killed near the corner of High and Shenandoah streets. During the day, two other citizens were killed, George W. Turner and Harpers Ferry Mayor Fontaine Beckham. When Brown realized he had no way to escape, he selected nine prisoners and moved them to the armory’s small fire engine house, which later became known as John Brown’s Fort.

With their plans falling apart, the raiders panicked. William H. Leeman tried to escape by swimming across the Potomac River, but was shot and killed. The townspeople, many of whom had been drinking all day on this unofficial holiday, used Leeman’s body for target practice. At 3:30 on Monday afternoon, authorities in Washington ordered Colonel Robert E. Lee to Harpers Ferry with a force of Marines to capture Brown. Lee’s first action was to close the town’s saloons in order to curb the random violence. At 6:30 on the morning of Tuesday, October 18, Lee ordered Lieutenant Israel Green and a group of men to storm the engine house. At a signal from Lieutenant J.E.B. Stuart, the engine house door was knocked down and the Marines began taking prisoners. Green seriously wounded Brown with his sword. Brown was taken to the Jefferson County seat of Charles Town for trial. 

Of Brown’s original twenty-two men, John H. Kagi, Jeremiah G. Anderson, William Thompson, Dauphin Thompson, Brown’s sons Oliver and Watson, Stewart Taylor, Leeman, and free African Americans Lewis S. Leary and Dangerfield Newby had been killed during the raid. John E. Cook and Albert Hazlett escaped into Pennsylvania but were captured and brought back to Charles Town. Brown, Aaron D. Stevens, Edwin Coppoc, and free African Americans John A. Copeland and Shields Green were all captured and imprisoned. Five raiders escaped and were never captured: Brown’s son Owen, Charles P. Tidd, Barclay Coppoc, Francis J. Merriam, and free African American Osborne P. Anderson. One Marine, Luke Quinn, was killed during the storming of the engine house. Two slaves, belonging to Brown’s prisoners Colonel Lewis Washington and John Allstadt, also lost their lives. It is unknown whether or not they voluntarily took up arms with Brown. One drowned while trying to escape and the other died in the Charles Town prison following the raid. Local residents at the time believed the two took part in the raid. To discredit Brown, residents later claimed that these two slaves had been taken prisoner and that no slaves actually participated in the raid. 

On December 2, 1859,  John Brown was hanged in Charles Town Virginia (now West Virginia) for treason and while his raid had failed, his capture and hanging had a much greater impact on national events. Brown’s actions set off shockwaves across the country. In the North, many hailed him as a hero. In the South, he was viewed as a villain and a true reflection of the North’s intended war on slavery. 

Tensions mounted in the days leading up to Brown’s execution. Rumors of a massive jailbreak circulated in both the North and South. The jail and gallows were guarded by Virginia troops, including Major Thomas Jackson—later to be known as “Stonewall.”

As Brown was brought to the gallows, he handed off a note that read, “I, John Brown, am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land can never be purged away but with blood.” Perhaps more than any other event, Brown’s death hastened a cascade of events that culminated with the first shots of the Civil War , 16 months later Northern abolitionists immediately used Brown's executions as an example of the government’s support of slavery. John Brown became their martyr, a hero murdered for his belief that slavery should be abolished. In reality, Brown and his men were prosecuted and executed for taking over a government facility. But in non-slave states, his execution on December 2, 1859, was marked by the tolling of church bells and martyrdom within the abolitionist movement whose “truth goes marching on”; reviled by others became  a symbol of pro-Union, anti-slavery beliefs.

"He did not recognize unjust human laws, but resisted them as he was bid. . . .," said Henry David Thoreau in an address to the citizens of Concord, Massachusetts. "No man in America has ever stood up so persistently and effectively for the dignity of human nature. . . ."

After the Civil War, a school was established at Harpers Ferry for African Americans. The leaders of Storer College always emphasized the courage and beliefs of John Brown for inspiration. In 1881, African-American leader Frederick Douglass delivered a classic speech at the school honoring Brown. Twenty-five years later, W.E.B. DuBois and Martinsburg newspaper editor J.R. Clifford recognized Harpers Ferry’s importance to African Americans and chose Storer College as the site for a meeting of the Second Niagara Movement, which later became the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Those in attendance walked at daybreak to John Brown’s Fort. In 1892, the fort had been sent to the Chicago World’s Fair and then brought back to a farm near Harpers Ferry. Today, the restored fort has been rebuilt at Harpers Ferry National Historical Park near its original location.

The original Brown family homestead burned down in 1918, but the foundation is still visible in Torrington — a visual reminder of the humble beginnings of one of America’s most controversial figures in the years leading up to the Civil War. The site is actively maintained by the Torrington Historical Society and became a stop on the Connecticut African-American Freedom Trail in 1997.

In his biography of Brown, Du Bois said the following about Brown’s legacy:

“Was John Brown simply an episode, or was he an eternal truth? And if a truth, how speaks that truth today? John Brown loved his neighbor as himself. He could not endure therefore to see his neighbor, poor, unfortunate, or oppressed. This natural sympathy was strengthened by a saturation in Hebrew religion which stressed the personal responsibility of every human soul to a just God. To this religion of equality and sympathy with misfortune, was added the strong influence of the social doctrines of the French Revolution with its emphasis on freedom and power in political life. And on all this was built John Brown’s own inchoate but growing belief in a more just and a more equal distribution of property. From this he concluded – and acted on that conclusion – that all men are created free and equal, and that the cost of liberty is less than the price of repression.”

What is undeniable for me, is that John Brown talked the talk and walked the walk. Brown popularized the idea of militant insurrections and drove a wedge between Americans who called for abolition and those who called for appeasement with slaveholders. Even after his death, Brown's legend lives on. John Brown's  dedication to a cause, was, and is, immortalized in the following song, "John Brown’s body"

 

John Brown's Body- Pete Seeger 

 

 

John Brown's body lies a-moldering in the grave
John Brown's body lies a-moldering in the grave
John Brown's body lies a-moldering in the grave
But his soul goes marching on

The stars above in Heaven are looking kindly down
The stars above in Heaven are looking kindly down
The stars above in Heaven are looking kindly down
On the grave of old John Brown

Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
His soul goes marching on

He captured Harper's Ferry with his nineteen men so true
He frightened old Virginia till she trembled through and through
They hung him for a traitor, they themselves the traitor crew
But his soul goes marching on

Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
Glory, Glory, Hallelujah
His soul goes marching on

 Further  Reading

“John Brown Birthplace Site,” Torrington Historical Society

Peter Vermilyea, “Hidden Nearby: John Brown’s Torrington Birthplace,” connecticuthistory.org

Cassetteboy vs The Tories May 2022

 

Cassetteboy has just released a brilliant new video mocking the Conservatives on the eve of the local elections.

In the two-minute clips the parodist has cut up speeches by senior government figures to show what they are really up to…

It starts with Boris Johnson apparently saying: ‘We’d rather let our people freeze than tax our energy companies’ and ends with: ’We are the party of lies’.

In between, Rishi Sunak, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Priti Patel and others are mocked with their own words…..

Cassetteboy don't make any money,, from their political videos, if you like what they do go to it     https://ko-fi.com/Cassetteboy they'd really appreciate it..

Song  Without Me (Instrumental)

Artist  Eminem

Album  Without Me

Writers Eminem, Kevin Bell, Malcolm McLaren, Jeff Bass, Anne Dudley, Trevor Horn

Licensed to YouTube by UMG (on behalf of Aftermath); AMRA, CMRRA, LatinAutorPerf, IMPEL, UNIAO BRASILEIRA DE EDITORAS DE MUSICA - UBEM, Kobalt Music Publishing, MINT_BMG, LatinAutor - PeerMusic, Peermusic, Forward Music Publishing Co., Ltd., BMG Rights Management (US), LLC, LatinAutor, ASCAP, ARESA, Reach Music Publishing, AMRA BR, BMI - Broadcast Music Inc., and 18 music rights societies

A reminder: local Conservatives are the same as Conservatives in Westminster.  They’re just nearer. They are not your friends.Vote them out, everywhere.The British Conservative party is diametrically opposed  to the good of the British public and deliberately acts against their interests. Their motives driven by authoritarianism designed to disenfranchise all, unless  you are not a millionaire, the Conservative Party is not your friend, they are enemies of the people. Inhabited by people with no feeling at all. How on earth are they governing this land,  they have no credible mandate to do so, and remain for me  a thoroughly nasty bunch of  people, with policies designed to wreck our lives, destroying Britain as they carve it into pieces.

Aided and abetted by their friends in the Daily Mail, the Telegraph and the Scum newspapers. Rags that keep on pumping out the same disingenous and divisive rubbish.  We should not forget the Tory's ruthless, toxic and unjust policies. Their constant assaults on the NHS, people on welfare, the disadvantaged, the poor, which include poorly paid workers.

We are currently living in very dark days for democracy  as Boris Johnson’s government continues to legislate away our democratic rights right under our noses. The Policing Bill, the Elections Bill, the Nationality and Borders Bill, the overhaul of the Human Rights Act, and others are indicative of Johnson’s  vision for an austere, divided and undemocratic Britain.  

Taken together, the picture looks very grim as almost every safeguard is being dismantled.Not only has Boris lost the moral authority to lead by lying to the public repeatedly, his government has proven beyond a doubt that their priority is power consolidation, not helping regular people deal with the cost of living or the impacts of COVID and Brexit.

Boris and his government are rushing these bills through because they want to be untouchable and unquestionable.A Government, elected on a minority of votes, has used its power to stack our electoral system in its favour, while bulldozing through every safeguard our political system has.

The Conservatives with their feelings of self entitlement believe they are born to rule. Unconcerned by any principles except their maintenance of power, they U-turn  on positions at a drop of a hat, betray promises and even sacrifice their own in order to maintain control.The interests they serve are not yours or mine, but those of the bankers, financiers, fossil fuel magnates and the elite. As they continue to inflict hardship on the vulnerable with  their ideological cruelty and want to transfer wealth upwards towards the rich,  they continue to fuck up the country, presiding over economic incompetence and unrelenting social catastrophe, leading  Britain to international isolation and the United Kingdom itself to breaking apart.

The Tories response to the cost of living crisis appears to be get on the bus to keep warm (Johnson) eat supermarket own brand foods (Eustace) nothing more I can fo right now (Sunak) pry (Mogg) and privatise yourself (Dorries).Meanwhil the rich get richer, energy companies make billions. 
The Tories simply do not care about this country's direction or the plight of the people, only with staying in charge.They are a real threat and a constant danger to our well being, and we all deserve so much better. We have to get rid of them. I hope the Tories get absolutely irreversibly annihilated  in the local elections tomorrow.

Vote Tactically to kick Tories out. Ensure the DUP loses assembly seats in N. Ireland,Vote for anyone who can get Tories out of councils and then out of government.  Make sure not to vote for Independents  who are maybe Tories in disguise. Vote  Conservative however if you enjoy being ripped-off, mugged off and made a fool of,